Problems with social media and hate writers

Problems with social media and hate writers

https://kimmonesittely.blogspot.com/p/problems-with-social-media-and-hate.html

Would Lenin be so popular, if he would use modern social media?

In the beginning, I would ask you one question, "would Lenin be so liked and popular, if that man would use modern social media?". What if people would recognize him as the imperial official?. In modern social media operates many hate writer and agitator, and if Lenin would use that thing, somebody would recognize him as the imperial official. Actually, there were people, who recognize this man, but that thing was not published in the bolsheviks media.

Would somebody follow that man in that case? Hate writers are an interesting part of social media. Many of those people are writing colorful texts, which makes them interesting and that means that especially youngsters are following those persons. That means that the hate writers are actually very nice guys at the first, and then they are starting to agitate against some minorities. When we are thinking about arguments, what those people use is always individual rights, and of course, they are representing the "advanced forces".

Many people want to be members of advanced forces.

The thing what makes them "advanced" is that they uphold things like abort, and then that thing makes them very democratic and advanced persons. Many of those people are forgotten the communist era of the Soviet Union, where the "advanced politics" allowed women to make aborts and the second thing what those "advanced forces" gave was atheism. There was a one really bad thing about abortions, and that was that the women were forced to take them if they got pregnant from some high-rank government officials.

But then we are facing some things, which are really interesting parts of the discussions of the abort. And that thing is that there have been many modern people, who want to deny the E-pills from the underage women, but at the same time they are supporting abortion. Sometimes I have wondered, why the underage women would not be implanted with the E-capsules, what denies the pregnancy, and also stabilizes the hormone level, what makes life easier, because the feelings of young women would be more stable.

Sometimes abortion rights are misused in some countries

That is one way to misuse the abortion right. In many countries, the law of abortion is really problematic, because there are many religious groups, who are against abortion but at the same time, they want to deny the E-pills, what would deny the unwanted pregnancy with very effective way. And there is one argument about this thing, there are some cases, where the court system must take a part of the question, have the parents got right to get an abortion for their daughter because that woman is underage.

There are many ways to make abortion, and one of them is the so-called abortion pill, and there are many discussions, is it allowed to give abortion pills to teenager, who got pregnant. If the person wanted to visit in the churches that meant the blacklisting, and sending to forest work to Sibir. This is a very good thing to show, how to tolerate many of those "advanced forces" have been. When we are thinking about things like "Arab spring", we must realize, that those people promised many things for people, and now they are using the same touch for their own political opposition.

But there are two things, which are problematic in the Arab nations the women's rights and children's rights. But the last one has been problematic also in Western society. There is always been an attitude that the children are the property of the adults, who must not hear in the legislation processes. And in that case, the political movements should remember, that in Finland the 15 years old people are right to use their votes in the next elections, and political parties are really interesting also those people because they would bring votes to the parties.

Radical is promising many things

They are promising  many good things for people, but when they were taken control of their government, the thing was that the people had the right to say, what they want to say if that thing is supporting their own opinion, and of course, those people were very wise, and everybody who wrote and talked against the wise men were some kind of maniacs, whose role was to send to the forest work or uranium mines, for the working therapy. Here I must say, that if we would meet Lenin in Switzerland when he was the refugee, we might like that man and many Bolshevists could be really nice men and women, but when the got the power, the situation was that there was a new emperor in Russia. This is one way to see things.

When somebody would write something in social media, there is always a danger that the writer would be some kind of radical, who would agitate the hate against some other people. But when we think this kind of people in the context of the Russian revolution in 1917, we might ask one question, and that is "would Lenin be so popular if he would use modern social media"?. "What if somebody would recognize that man as the imperial civil servant?". This means that social media would uncover some secrets, what those hate writers don't want other people to know. And one thing is that we might say, that there are many theories in the "what if" front, and as I wrote at the beginning, what if Lenin and Hitler would use social media, would they be so popular, as they were?