Skip to main content

What if people have a basic income?

What if people have a basic income?

What if the basic income would concern only the wealthy states like Japanese or some other industrial state citizens?

The wealthiest people in the world own 720 billion dollars, and most of the people would not have money to buy the clothes. So there have been talking that the wealthiest people would give money to those poor people. And that is the question, what is always on the lips of some people.

But there are also politicians, who have given permissions of basic income what concerns only the people, who have the nationality of some western country. In that thing that money would not go to Africa or Asia or Latin America. It would be reserved only to the people, who have the nationality of the European, North American or the wealthy Asian States like Japan, Korean and Singapore citizens. In this case, that money would not help any person outside those countries. What would you think about that?

It's true that this idea would be absurd in the mind of many people because they are afraid that the money to that thing would be taken from taxes, or that income would transfer straight to the prices. But if that thing would not raise prices or taxes, the idea would be very good. There is still one problem, and that is that basic income would cause social problems, if the person, who has problems with alcohol or drugs would get that money.

The money must get from somewhere


The idea of this writing have been got from the film, what is below this text, and that is a very interesting thing. Sometimes politicians and philosophers have been introduced an idea of the basic income every people on this planet, or at least their own country. In the first sign, that would seem a very nice idea, and this is the thing, what many people are thinking when they are talking about this kind of permissions.

But there is one big threat to this kind of thing, and that is connected to economics. That thing is that the money for that project must be taken from someplace, and that might mean that the prices of the entire state would rise the same way, what the basic income would be, and that means that if the basic income would be 500 euros per month, that means that the prices can rise 500 euros. And this makes basic income a very complicated thing.

The money for that thing must take from someplace, and that money is away from some other things, which are also important. In fact, there are people who think that social security is the synonym for the basic income, and they say, that the money, what people can get from social security is the basic income. And here is a thing, what we might think very seriously, because if the idea of basic income would not raise the prices that is a very useful thing, to keep society peaceful.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y81BlyTUwNg

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When robots are laughing and crying.

When robots are laughing and crying.  Does the AI have feelings?  Does the AI have feelings? Or can it be emphatic? The fact is this program code that controls the AI determines if it can give empathic reactions. The problem with the human nervous system is that we don't make a difference in the writing of empathic letters or telling empathic stories human or AI. Our nervous system is not adapted to AI yet. And that's why we cannot separate text written by AI from text that made by humans.  What does somebody make with AI that can emulate feelings? The fact is that the cyborgs are useful tools for infiltration operations. The human-size robots can have WLAN/6G connections with the central computers. Or they can form a neural network that shares information between all group members. The robots can also act as walking neural network-based supercomputers. That can make complicated solutions.  In those networks, each member shares information and their data-handling capacity all o

Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization

    Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization The Earth 2.0 or officially Kepler-452b is locating extreme log distance from Earth(1).    A new Earth-type planet has been found near the star, which is similar to our own Sun. The journey to that planet would take 1400 years, even if the spacecraft will reach the speed of the light. The planet has been found in the year 2008, but the confirmation of the existence of that planet has been taken time, but in 2015 the confirmation has been got, and Earth 2.0 has turned true.  The mass of that planet is 1,9 times Earth and the temperature is excellent if we are thinking about liquid water, but the journey to that planet will take so long, that we cannot ever go in there by using regular rockets and technology. The thing is that this kind of planets are the most interesting if we are looking for the lifeforms, which are similar to us, and the problem with that kind of things is that the communicatio

Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission

  Image I Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission 1) Tunguska UFO-theory  Tunguska meteorite is the mystery, that has been solved once, but then the case has been open again because Lake Cheko was not suitable for an impact crater. That lake has been introducing as an impact crater of the Tunguska meteorite. But the problem is that the shape of that lake is like a swimming pool. And that means it cannot form by a meteorite. So the mystery remains.  Meteorites can launch the natural nuclear fission if they hit the uranium ore, and transfer the impact energy to that ore. And is the thing that the famous "Tunguska" meteorite caused that kind of effect? There is also a theory that some "UFO" explode in that area, but the thing is that it is only theory, but interesting topics for some TV-series.  So I will begin this text by handling that theory, which is one of the incredible and outstanding theories in the world. Officially there is no physical evidence of