Skip to main content

Science is like fantasy

Science is like fantasy

Picture I


Have you ever thought about how fantastic science can really be? Or what actually means theoretical science? There are no limits in the world when people are thinking about things like "what if", and after that would come the two kilometers long text, and the thing is that actually nobody even knows, what is written after the worlds "what if". Let me tell you about a little example of this thing, and that is really the well-known image of Enrico Fermi or Albert Einstein, who are standing ahead of their blackboards, and there is something, what looks like the mathematical formula on that screen or blackboard.

Who knows about the meaning of that calculation or formula? On top of the text is an image of the blackboard of Albert Einstein, and if we would have time, we could simply use Google to search those terms from the Internet. And at first, we could start the most common letter, what seems like P or D, and ask Google, what means P or D in the physics, the reason, why we would like to use word "physics" in Google is that Einstein was physic.

So maybe those letters are meant for the physics formula, and the results we might see from the Wikipedia, where is a list of common physics notations. In that homepage would be told that the big P means pressure (Pascal) or momentum, at opposite order big D is the electric displacement field also called the electric flux density, and if we would want to be careful, we could check those terms from some book of mathematical and physics formulas. That means that if somebody has been vandalized that Wikipedia page, would that cause horrifying thing in the formulas of the physics.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_common_physics_notations

The problem with the homepages of physics is that the data, what is stored on them might be changed. And why somebody wants to mess the sensitive scientist's calculations. That thing is that nuclear weapons projects would need very sharp calculations if there would be missing something, the result could be very really exploding. And one of the things what might go wrong is if the rotating speed of the centrifuge is too high, that would cause the explosion in the laboratory.

When people handle the radioactive material, they must realize, that is the energy level of the radioactive material is rising, would that decrease the critical mass. And if the weight of the radioactive material would go above this mass, would the result be the nuclear explosion. When we are thinking about the situation, that somebody would not know about it, we might face the situation, that the nuclear laboratory would vanish in the flash, what turns everything in those areas to vapor.

Picture I
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/89/Einstein_blackboard.jpg/1200px-Einstein_blackboard.jpg

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When robots are laughing and crying.

When robots are laughing and crying.  Does the AI have feelings?  Does the AI have feelings? Or can it be emphatic? The fact is this program code that controls the AI determines if it can give empathic reactions. The problem with the human nervous system is that we don't make a difference in the writing of empathic letters or telling empathic stories human or AI. Our nervous system is not adapted to AI yet. And that's why we cannot separate text written by AI from text that made by humans.  What does somebody make with AI that can emulate feelings? The fact is that the cyborgs are useful tools for infiltration operations. The human-size robots can have WLAN/6G connections with the central computers. Or they can form a neural network that shares information between all group members. The robots can also act as walking neural network-based supercomputers. That can make complicated solutions.  In those networks, each member shares information and their data-handling capacity all o

Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization

    Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization The Earth 2.0 or officially Kepler-452b is locating extreme log distance from Earth(1).    A new Earth-type planet has been found near the star, which is similar to our own Sun. The journey to that planet would take 1400 years, even if the spacecraft will reach the speed of the light. The planet has been found in the year 2008, but the confirmation of the existence of that planet has been taken time, but in 2015 the confirmation has been got, and Earth 2.0 has turned true.  The mass of that planet is 1,9 times Earth and the temperature is excellent if we are thinking about liquid water, but the journey to that planet will take so long, that we cannot ever go in there by using regular rockets and technology. The thing is that this kind of planets are the most interesting if we are looking for the lifeforms, which are similar to us, and the problem with that kind of things is that the communicatio

Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission

  Image I Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission 1) Tunguska UFO-theory  Tunguska meteorite is the mystery, that has been solved once, but then the case has been open again because Lake Cheko was not suitable for an impact crater. That lake has been introducing as an impact crater of the Tunguska meteorite. But the problem is that the shape of that lake is like a swimming pool. And that means it cannot form by a meteorite. So the mystery remains.  Meteorites can launch the natural nuclear fission if they hit the uranium ore, and transfer the impact energy to that ore. And is the thing that the famous "Tunguska" meteorite caused that kind of effect? There is also a theory that some "UFO" explode in that area, but the thing is that it is only theory, but interesting topics for some TV-series.  So I will begin this text by handling that theory, which is one of the incredible and outstanding theories in the world. Officially there is no physical evidence of