Skip to main content

Problems with pocket-size mobile command systems

Problems with pocket-size mobile command systems

The hero of our time "man in the suit"

When we are thinking about the modern version of the national hero, we might think the man, who wears a black suit and slips. This man has replaced generals and other uniform users in the hardcore national security situations. This modern hero just takes the mobile telephone from the pocket, if the national security is in danger, and then this hero activates the mobile software, and after that this cell phone turns to command equipment.

The tablets are actually the same with mobile telephones, and that means that also pocket-size versions of the same mobile tools, what are used in the tablets. This means that the cell-phones can be used in the same role with those tablets, and this allows the operators to just sit on the bar, and use the same battle-control equipment what the men are using in the field, but this makes that person stealth, and that makes them bad targets to the enemy military.

By using this tool the head of the national security would order military forces, and if the threat would not surrender immediately that man or woman would take the cell phone from the pocket, and use the secret sign or by using voice and face recognition. After that 100 combat drones would immediately attack to that position. This is the vision of the future of the command systems.

Every command tool can miniaturize as the pocket size.

The mobile telephone can be used to command military systems as well as some laptop computer. And the laptops are similar things, with the table model computers, but they are portable. That means that those systems can be used in the moving vehicles, and the personnel, what uses this kind of tools can make their command center anywhere they want.

This is the modern version of mobile command platform, but today the mobile telephones can be used in any bar, and those command tools would load to those pocket-size systems. This makes the command systems even more flexible than they have been. Those mobile tools can communicate with supercomputers by using encrypting telecommunication networks, which makes very hard to locate those people from the streets.

And mobile tools are making everything very flexible. In some scenarios, the agents would take some drones inside some house. Those very small drones would have a small gun as Derringer installed under them. Then that small quadcopter would communicate with command center by using satellite communication, which allows that the system can be controlled from some command center, or the hitman can stand in the line, and just takes the mobile telephone from the pocket. This system allows controlling those drones from the other side of Earth by sitting in the toilet. This is the thing, what the pocket size multi-mission tool is in use.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Could this be the thing, that some people don't want you to know about zombies?

Could this be the thing, that some people don't want you to know about zombies? The simplest way to control zombies, which are made by using tetrodotoxin, which is called "zombie poison" is to use the automatic dispenser, which is normally used in diabetes treatment. In this case, the dispenser would be loaded by using tetrodotoxin. If the level of this poison is right, the person would be totally under the control of other people. And if the system cannot detect this poison there is a possibility to make the laboratory experiment when the staff will follow the decrease of the tetrodotoxin, and then the system can use a simple clock, which will inject poison to the body of a victim after a certain time. This would be an effective tool in the hands of military and counter-terror operators. Those zombies can be captured enemy operators, who will send back, and then they just kill their ex-partners. By using genetically engineered bacteria could be possible to create t...

Terrifying visions of genetic engineering.

 Terrifying visions of genetic engineering.  The modern Hounds of Baskerville ABW:s (Advanced biological weapons are the modern Hounds of Baskerville. The term ABV means the animal which is genetically engineered. And which is controlled by using some interactive electronic systems. There is a possibility to connect the action camera to dogs collars. And transmit commands to that animal by using electronic systems. Spoken words can use to the commands.  Or they can be a series of sounds that are stored in the sound files. When the operator activates a certain file that sound means a certain command to the animals. There is the possibility to automatize some commands by connecting the system to the image recognition tool. When the action camera sees something that is stored in the memory of the computer. That system sends the coded order to the animal.  Nanotechnology and genetic engineering are the most lethal combination in the world. The ABW:s (Advanced Biological ...

The story of (Northrop?) TR3A "Black Manta"

    Image I The story of (Northrop?) TR3A "Black Manta" Sometimes there have been discussions that the mysterious TR3A "Black Manta" was a study project for the B-2 bomber.  That means that TR3A was used as the flying mockup for testing the aerodynamic and control solutions for the B-2 "Spirit" bomber. The thing that supports this thing is that the manufacturer of both planes is Northrop corporation.  Along with "Aurora" was flying one other mysterious aircraft, TR3A "Black Manta". The system is described as the "Stealth VTOL" (Vertical Take-Off and Landing) aircraft. Unless the mysterious TR3B, the Northrop TR3A is the conventional VTOL-aircraft, what is using regular jet engines, but what has the stealth-body.  Image II The thing is that the stealth-reconnaissance aircraft, which uses a similar technology with the Northrop B-2 bomber would be an interesting part of the weapon arsenal. There is a possibility that the TR3A was...