Skip to main content

Problems with pocket-size mobile command systems

Problems with pocket-size mobile command systems

The hero of our time "man in the suit"

When we are thinking about the modern version of the national hero, we might think the man, who wears a black suit and slips. This man has replaced generals and other uniform users in the hardcore national security situations. This modern hero just takes the mobile telephone from the pocket, if the national security is in danger, and then this hero activates the mobile software, and after that this cell phone turns to command equipment.

The tablets are actually the same with mobile telephones, and that means that also pocket-size versions of the same mobile tools, what are used in the tablets. This means that the cell-phones can be used in the same role with those tablets, and this allows the operators to just sit on the bar, and use the same battle-control equipment what the men are using in the field, but this makes that person stealth, and that makes them bad targets to the enemy military.

By using this tool the head of the national security would order military forces, and if the threat would not surrender immediately that man or woman would take the cell phone from the pocket, and use the secret sign or by using voice and face recognition. After that 100 combat drones would immediately attack to that position. This is the vision of the future of the command systems.

Every command tool can miniaturize as the pocket size.

The mobile telephone can be used to command military systems as well as some laptop computer. And the laptops are similar things, with the table model computers, but they are portable. That means that those systems can be used in the moving vehicles, and the personnel, what uses this kind of tools can make their command center anywhere they want.

This is the modern version of mobile command platform, but today the mobile telephones can be used in any bar, and those command tools would load to those pocket-size systems. This makes the command systems even more flexible than they have been. Those mobile tools can communicate with supercomputers by using encrypting telecommunication networks, which makes very hard to locate those people from the streets.

And mobile tools are making everything very flexible. In some scenarios, the agents would take some drones inside some house. Those very small drones would have a small gun as Derringer installed under them. Then that small quadcopter would communicate with command center by using satellite communication, which allows that the system can be controlled from some command center, or the hitman can stand in the line, and just takes the mobile telephone from the pocket. This system allows controlling those drones from the other side of Earth by sitting in the toilet. This is the thing, what the pocket size multi-mission tool is in use.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When robots are laughing and crying.

When robots are laughing and crying.  Does the AI have feelings?  Does the AI have feelings? Or can it be emphatic? The fact is this program code that controls the AI determines if it can give empathic reactions. The problem with the human nervous system is that we don't make a difference in the writing of empathic letters or telling empathic stories human or AI. Our nervous system is not adapted to AI yet. And that's why we cannot separate text written by AI from text that made by humans.  What does somebody make with AI that can emulate feelings? The fact is that the cyborgs are useful tools for infiltration operations. The human-size robots can have WLAN/6G connections with the central computers. Or they can form a neural network that shares information between all group members. The robots can also act as walking neural network-based supercomputers. That can make complicated solutions.  In those networks, each member shares information and their data-handling capacity all o

Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization

    Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization The Earth 2.0 or officially Kepler-452b is locating extreme log distance from Earth(1).    A new Earth-type planet has been found near the star, which is similar to our own Sun. The journey to that planet would take 1400 years, even if the spacecraft will reach the speed of the light. The planet has been found in the year 2008, but the confirmation of the existence of that planet has been taken time, but in 2015 the confirmation has been got, and Earth 2.0 has turned true.  The mass of that planet is 1,9 times Earth and the temperature is excellent if we are thinking about liquid water, but the journey to that planet will take so long, that we cannot ever go in there by using regular rockets and technology. The thing is that this kind of planets are the most interesting if we are looking for the lifeforms, which are similar to us, and the problem with that kind of things is that the communicatio

Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission

  Image I Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission 1) Tunguska UFO-theory  Tunguska meteorite is the mystery, that has been solved once, but then the case has been open again because Lake Cheko was not suitable for an impact crater. That lake has been introducing as an impact crater of the Tunguska meteorite. But the problem is that the shape of that lake is like a swimming pool. And that means it cannot form by a meteorite. So the mystery remains.  Meteorites can launch the natural nuclear fission if they hit the uranium ore, and transfer the impact energy to that ore. And is the thing that the famous "Tunguska" meteorite caused that kind of effect? There is also a theory that some "UFO" explode in that area, but the thing is that it is only theory, but interesting topics for some TV-series.  So I will begin this text by handling that theory, which is one of the incredible and outstanding theories in the world. Officially there is no physical evidence of