The hoax information and the dangers of it

The hoax information and the dangers of it

The false-flag information attacks

The false-flag information operations are one of the most sophisticated tools in the hands of trollers. The false-flag attack in social media would be done by using faked social media accounts, or by stealing the well-known user's account, and then start to deliver the deep fake images and films. That means that the faked commercials can deliver on social media, and the customers would come to some shop, and ask for sales, which have not existed.

The most dangerous effect in cyber warfare is that using deep faked information, which is connected with false-flag operations in social media. During those operations, the hackers can use that thing as the platform's phishing operations. And even the nuclear weapons officials would try to get in the trap and give the access codes to the nuclear storages. This is one of the scariest visions that have been introduced in the media.

False-flag attacks can be made by using captured social media accounts, which belonged to some media houses. That thing would make those attacks more effective than they would otherwise be, and in the hands of the wrong people, those things are creepy. If we are believing that some actor is trusted, the captured account can make very big damages, because the trusted actor would not deliver faked information. And that would cause the thing that somebody would even start the nuclear war by using that kind of method.

So the worst of the fears is that the faked information can cause nuclear warfare. This theoretical scenario begins with the idea that some support systems of nuclear weapons would be hacked. In this case, somebody would get the codes for access to the nuclear weapon message and communication systems. 

When we are thinking that the military place like Cheyenne Mountain or Gora Yamantau would be hacked and in those screens, what is used to commanding the nuclear weapons would be caught by hackers, who would deliver the hoax information of the incoming nuclear strike, that thing can cause war in theory. The problem is that if the nuclear weapon operators would notice the attack, they have only a couple of minute time to react.

And there is no time for making double-checks by using What's App and asking about the situation on the ground. So what if somebody hacks the communication line of the nuclear command?

In this kind of visions the persons, who are serving the third country, what is in war, and then those people would hack some missile control computer. After that, they would deliver the hoax information that some missiles have been shot from their enemy territory, which could cause that the personnel of that base would estimate the situation that they should open fire with nuclear weapons.

Image:

https://listverse.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/wikipedia-is-fake-news.jpeg

The statue, what would destroy the entire building

The statue, what would destroy the entire building

Have you seen the statues, what have a metallic bow on their hand? The mission of those statues had been something else than just innocent. If the person stood near them and played some instrument or even spoke, those statues caused resonance, what could break bones, if on the bow or arrow was put the bite of bone.

So when we are thinking about the situation in some ancient temples, we must realize, that those buildings were very impressive. There was probably some kind of organ pipe, and when capillary effect pulls the ait through those tubes, that caused beautiful or at least impressive sound effects. And if the gifts were not pleased those people, they just brought something like bone or the bite of local concrete to the place, and that thing would cause damages to the structures.

When we are thinking about the test, what Nikola Tesla made, and the small resonance machine almost destroyed the entire house, the dangers of that kind of phenomenon came to publicity. The small loudspeaker caused the effect, where the entire building felt like shaking, and that almost caused the collapse.

Those statues will give an effect as the bow of the witch because the pain, in that case, will be very incredible. These kinds of things are normally not spoken in schools.

If that kind statue would be made by using the same concrete or steel, what is used in the steel structure of that house, the entire house can be destroyed. The thing that destroys the houses is called resonance. A most devastating version of that phenomenon is the cases, where the steel structure in the concrete would start to oscillate. That drops concrete immediately out from the walls, and this thing destroys houses during the earthquake.

Sometimes LRAD-systems have tested to create the sound, which would break the concrete. The resonance would also make aluminum, what is used in aircraft softer, and that causes risk on air. The acoustic systems would be used in the "silent sabotage". The tests of those acoustic weapons are made secrecy, but there have been plans to use acoustic systems also for normal demolition operations for making structures softer, that the needed number of explosives is smaller. There are problems with those acoustic systems, that they would cause problems with the natural animals.

When we are thinking the birds like parrots, what are imitating sounds, there is a very small possibility that those birds would learn to imitate the sounds and frequencies, what are used in those tests. That kind of case would be extremely extraordinary, and in fact, there is not mentioned any official cases, that some parrot would learn the voice, what would break the houses.

Who can we trust?

Who can we trust?

Trust is the thing, what must earn. The problem with trust is to find out, who we can trust? If we would think that we can speak freely everything, what we want, we can go straight to a nightmare. But if we would be too suspicious, we might harm our own business and other things. And this is the major problem in earning trust. We must find the actors, who we should not trust.

When we have located that kind of persons, we must find ourselves in front of the other kind of problem. Or a couple of problems, if we are sharp. The first one is, who will believe us, and the second one is that is there some person hiding behind some drug user, who would select and give that data to the operator, who works under our eyes. If we kick that cleaner or ICT-supporter away, that would cause, that this person will be replaced by somebody, who we cannot predict.

The induction problem would be, what we can do next when we have located that kind of actor? If we are facing people, who will break the rules garishly, that would mean that this person might have support in that kind of things. And the thing is that the person, who we think as the leaker of information would be somebody else, and the person who we see in front of us only channels, what real traitor is using.

When we are facing the case, that some person is leaking information, we must make an analyze, what kind of data that person has given. And then we must think, does that person have access to that kind of data? In some cases, when the medical information is leaked from hospitals, I would ask, what cleaner would do with the data what is containing the information of the patient's medical records?

So is there some actor behind that person? The type of data, what is delivered will uncover many things, and one of them if the data contains only information of the psychiatrical reports what are meant for highly-trained specialists, that tells that somebody who has education has chosen those files for that actor. People who have not trained would not deliver only the data, what affects courtrooms, and if the delivered data contains only things, what are effective, that tells that they are chosen by the person who is not cleaner.

But then we might think another thing, what is ever mentioned in this kind of cases. How that leaker would think to survive in that kind of situation? There is something, what that person thinks as an effective way to keep the victim's mouth shut. And something confesses people that there would not be consequences. So do they know somebody inside the family of the target?

When we are facing the leaker, we might kick that person away from the firm right away. But we might also follow that person because something caused, that the person has given those files to the unauthorized actors, and the question is, why that person allows doing that thing? Why didn't that person contacted police or lawyer, if somebody blackmails this inmate? And if we would kick that leaker away, there would be somebody else, who might be more dangerous than some cleaner.

Writing about the Plato's Academy and why philosophy turned danger for the rulers

When Emperor Justinian I closed the academy in year 529, that thing ended that era of antique. The reason for that thing was that Philosophy claimed to be dangerous for the people, and the purpose of Justinian was to support Christianity. The thing, what made Philosophy dangerous is that thing taught the skepticism. That meant that the philosopher must think carefully about every side of the things, and be suspicious about the things, even they would come from the authorities.

The thing is that suspicious attitude eliminated the blind loyalty for authorities, and that means that people would not think the Emperor as the messenger, who is ruled with the mandate, what is given by the God. The thing is that the academy was actually the small corner of the park, was probably saved philosophers sometimes earlier, and the thing was that the academy was the men who worked in there.

The infrastructure was not necessary, and only thing, what was needed were the men and their texts. And when we are thinking about things, what caused that Justinian made the decision to shut down the academy, we might find one thing, what can be over the top in this case. The thing was that Justinian was unable to tolerate critics. This is a strange phenomenon in many people.

They are requesting that every other person must tolerate criticism, but they self are so sensitive about this kind of things. They don't tolerate any excuses about their decisions. And we know that the thing called smugness. Sometimes leaders are unable to tolerate anything, what is against their will, and Justinian was one of them. He ruled in the name of God, and nobody allows to excuse that thing. When we are thinking about things like Chess, those games have been reserved for the rulers, that they could practice their tactics.

But the thing was that if the henchman would win the leader, that might be catastrophic. The leaders must be above other people, and if Henchmen would win the leader, the self-esteem of that person would be damaged. This might be the reason, why this game is prohibited in Islamic law. Real Muslim lives for serving God, and and the leader is the incarnation of the thing, what is invisible for normal people.

The Chess-game would cause the thoughts about the person would turn away from the serving the god, and that thing caused that the Chess was prohibited in the Sharia.  And the thing is that there was a similar situation in the time of Justinian. The leaders were created to think, and the henchmen were made to serve the leader, or actually, they served the god whose spacer the leader of the gang was.

Every thought, what came in the mind of Justinian meant to follow. And if somebody would excuse those orders, would that cause the situation, that the god was angry, because Justinian was the representer of the god in the middle of people. And every thought, what came in his mind was given by God. And that caused problems with philosophers. They sometimes suspected that thing, and that caused the situation, where Justinian closed the academy because he couldn't tolerate those things,