Who can we trust?
Trust is the thing, what must earn. The problem with trust is to find out, who we can trust? If we would think that we can speak freely everything, what we want, we can go straight to a nightmare. But if we would be too suspicious, we might harm our own business and other things. And this is the major problem in earning trust. We must find the actors, who we should not trust.
When we have located that kind of persons, we must find ourselves in front of the other kind of problem. Or a couple of problems, if we are sharp. The first one is, who will believe us, and the second one is that is there some person hiding behind some drug user, who would select and give that data to the operator, who works under our eyes. If we kick that cleaner or ICT-supporter away, that would cause, that this person will be replaced by somebody, who we cannot predict.
The induction problem would be, what we can do next when we have located that kind of actor? If we are facing people, who will break the rules garishly, that would mean that this person might have support in that kind of things. And the thing is that the person, who we think as the leaker of information would be somebody else, and the person who we see in front of us only channels, what real traitor is using.
When we are facing the case, that some person is leaking information, we must make an analyze, what kind of data that person has given. And then we must think, does that person have access to that kind of data? In some cases, when the medical information is leaked from hospitals, I would ask, what cleaner would do with the data what is containing the information of the patient's medical records?
So is there some actor behind that person? The type of data, what is delivered will uncover many things, and one of them if the data contains only information of the psychiatrical reports what are meant for highly-trained specialists, that tells that somebody who has education has chosen those files for that actor. People who have not trained would not deliver only the data, what affects courtrooms, and if the delivered data contains only things, what are effective, that tells that they are chosen by the person who is not cleaner.
But then we might think another thing, what is ever mentioned in this kind of cases. How that leaker would think to survive in that kind of situation? There is something, what that person thinks as an effective way to keep the victim's mouth shut. And something confesses people that there would not be consequences. So do they know somebody inside the family of the target?
When we are facing the leaker, we might kick that person away from the firm right away. But we might also follow that person because something caused, that the person has given those files to the unauthorized actors, and the question is, why that person allows doing that thing? Why didn't that person contacted police or lawyer, if somebody blackmails this inmate? And if we would kick that leaker away, there would be somebody else, who might be more dangerous than some cleaner.
Trust is the thing, what must earn. The problem with trust is to find out, who we can trust? If we would think that we can speak freely everything, what we want, we can go straight to a nightmare. But if we would be too suspicious, we might harm our own business and other things. And this is the major problem in earning trust. We must find the actors, who we should not trust.
When we have located that kind of persons, we must find ourselves in front of the other kind of problem. Or a couple of problems, if we are sharp. The first one is, who will believe us, and the second one is that is there some person hiding behind some drug user, who would select and give that data to the operator, who works under our eyes. If we kick that cleaner or ICT-supporter away, that would cause, that this person will be replaced by somebody, who we cannot predict.
The induction problem would be, what we can do next when we have located that kind of actor? If we are facing people, who will break the rules garishly, that would mean that this person might have support in that kind of things. And the thing is that the person, who we think as the leaker of information would be somebody else, and the person who we see in front of us only channels, what real traitor is using.
When we are facing the case, that some person is leaking information, we must make an analyze, what kind of data that person has given. And then we must think, does that person have access to that kind of data? In some cases, when the medical information is leaked from hospitals, I would ask, what cleaner would do with the data what is containing the information of the patient's medical records?
So is there some actor behind that person? The type of data, what is delivered will uncover many things, and one of them if the data contains only information of the psychiatrical reports what are meant for highly-trained specialists, that tells that somebody who has education has chosen those files for that actor. People who have not trained would not deliver only the data, what affects courtrooms, and if the delivered data contains only things, what are effective, that tells that they are chosen by the person who is not cleaner.
But then we might think another thing, what is ever mentioned in this kind of cases. How that leaker would think to survive in that kind of situation? There is something, what that person thinks as an effective way to keep the victim's mouth shut. And something confesses people that there would not be consequences. So do they know somebody inside the family of the target?
When we are facing the leaker, we might kick that person away from the firm right away. But we might also follow that person because something caused, that the person has given those files to the unauthorized actors, and the question is, why that person allows doing that thing? Why didn't that person contacted police or lawyer, if somebody blackmails this inmate? And if we would kick that leaker away, there would be somebody else, who might be more dangerous than some cleaner.
Comments
Post a Comment