When climate changes, we can just sit and wait or do something with that kind of things
The thing, what Greta Thurnberg has brought in the front of the eyes of public media is that children are not responsible about things, what adults are done. The climate chancing is a very big and bad problem for the people around the world. We can sit and wait for it. Or we can start to create technology and change our lifestyle which might decrease the level of carbon dioxide production. The decision is ours, and what road we would choose would affect the next generations.
But there is one more thing, what this young woman has also raised in front of the eyes of people, and that is why adults must not think children when they are making decisions? There are many things, which we have left to next generations and that thing is the price, what our children must face.
The thing is that we could wait that temperature would rise a couple of degrees, and probably easier to start the decrease the level of carbon dioxide production. And here we must remember that even if we would stop the production of carbon dioxide right away, the decreasing temperature would take even generations because the problem is so huge.
When we are thinking about people, who are guilty of climate changing, we must notice that the people who are the age of 16 are not those people. We know that we adults have power, and that might be a legal action to force those youngsters and children away from streets. But that action would not remove the climate chancing. And are those youngsters responsible for things and decisions that are made in some cabinets?
If a person doesn't have the legal right to deny the wrong decisions, we must notice that this person has no responsibility for that kind of things. But the people who live after us might ask, why people burned so much fossil fuel? Why did the climate let warmed? The thing is that I'm not responsible for things, which were made in the 1960s. And the rising temperature is not a very good thing at all.
But even if we would let the temperature rise, we can face very big and bad problems. Of course, we can wait a couple of years and think that the warming climate is the problem of the next generations. We can, of course, think that it would be easier to blame each other about things than do something. But what would be the price of that advantage?
The threat of war is increasing
When rains would be heavier, and the water is covering the farms, the vegetables would die, because their roots would not get air anymore. That will take all harvest, and also the size of deserts are growing. And the thing is the water would pollute when bacteria would get in the groundwater. This kind of things is causing refugee problems because there is not enough space for people. And nuclear weapons decrease the level of the full-scale military force against neighbors.
So need to clean water would cause that more and more carbon dioxide would get in the air, which will accelerate the raising of temperature. And the extremely hot summers are causing terrible situations in big cities like Mumbai, and the problems would become more serious because many country people are moving in that kind of cities.
Those people, who cannot even read are offering good targets for political far-wing movements. This is rising the threat of war. And because many people are moving to other lands, and if there are problems, the leaders of the nation will want to defend them. The rising threat of war would make more nations to get nuclear weapons because they are offering a strong defense.
And who cares, what the presidents, who are leaders of the nuclear powers are saying? That kind of advantage is very alarming, and the rising temperature would cause humanitarian catastrophes and increase the threat of war because people cannot live in their homes anymore.
The thing, what Greta Thurnberg has brought in the front of the eyes of public media is that children are not responsible about things, what adults are done. The climate chancing is a very big and bad problem for the people around the world. We can sit and wait for it. Or we can start to create technology and change our lifestyle which might decrease the level of carbon dioxide production. The decision is ours, and what road we would choose would affect the next generations.
But there is one more thing, what this young woman has also raised in front of the eyes of people, and that is why adults must not think children when they are making decisions? There are many things, which we have left to next generations and that thing is the price, what our children must face.
The thing is that we could wait that temperature would rise a couple of degrees, and probably easier to start the decrease the level of carbon dioxide production. And here we must remember that even if we would stop the production of carbon dioxide right away, the decreasing temperature would take even generations because the problem is so huge.
When we are thinking about people, who are guilty of climate changing, we must notice that the people who are the age of 16 are not those people. We know that we adults have power, and that might be a legal action to force those youngsters and children away from streets. But that action would not remove the climate chancing. And are those youngsters responsible for things and decisions that are made in some cabinets?
If a person doesn't have the legal right to deny the wrong decisions, we must notice that this person has no responsibility for that kind of things. But the people who live after us might ask, why people burned so much fossil fuel? Why did the climate let warmed? The thing is that I'm not responsible for things, which were made in the 1960s. And the rising temperature is not a very good thing at all.
But even if we would let the temperature rise, we can face very big and bad problems. Of course, we can wait a couple of years and think that the warming climate is the problem of the next generations. We can, of course, think that it would be easier to blame each other about things than do something. But what would be the price of that advantage?
The threat of war is increasing
When rains would be heavier, and the water is covering the farms, the vegetables would die, because their roots would not get air anymore. That will take all harvest, and also the size of deserts are growing. And the thing is the water would pollute when bacteria would get in the groundwater. This kind of things is causing refugee problems because there is not enough space for people. And nuclear weapons decrease the level of the full-scale military force against neighbors.
So need to clean water would cause that more and more carbon dioxide would get in the air, which will accelerate the raising of temperature. And the extremely hot summers are causing terrible situations in big cities like Mumbai, and the problems would become more serious because many country people are moving in that kind of cities.
Those people, who cannot even read are offering good targets for political far-wing movements. This is rising the threat of war. And because many people are moving to other lands, and if there are problems, the leaders of the nation will want to defend them. The rising threat of war would make more nations to get nuclear weapons because they are offering a strong defense.
And who cares, what the presidents, who are leaders of the nuclear powers are saying? That kind of advantage is very alarming, and the rising temperature would cause humanitarian catastrophes and increase the threat of war because people cannot live in their homes anymore.
Comments
Post a Comment