What literature tells about society?
Litterature or so-called official writings is a very good tool for deciding the attitudes in society. If some publishings are prohibited or censored, that means that something is embarrassing about those texts or writings. There are two ways to make censorship. Another is the official censorship, which is made by authorities, and the other way is that the publishers just refuse the co-operation with writers, whose texts are not pleasing them or the people, who are behind those firms.
But the opposite or mirror-version of the censorship is the books and writings, what are marketed by strong volume. Strong or high-level marketing is telling that somebody, who has money wants that everybody should read those texts. And if the government shares some texts to its officials or quests, that means that in those texts is the agenda, what the government wants to represent for everybody.
That text might be the book, what is written by the leader of the state, what means that the book is offering the window to the mind of national leader, and how the top man wants to see things. And how that person arguments things like how that person became the candidate for the elections, and other cases that would bring the light to decision for staying in power over a couple of elections.
Those things are important when other governments are planning the strategies for that nation and the policy for other nations. If the writer has a strong influence on the internal politics of that nation the profile of that person is very important.
The literature, what is brought to markets by so-called official publishers is the window to the society. And the reason for that is that the writers who are selected by publishers are so-called leading persons in the cultural society and those people want always to be people, who have attitudes and opinions about many things like the environment and social problems. That kind of persons is really good examples, what the people think about some things.
If the books are telling stories about heroism and other important things like wars, that thing tells about growing national spirit. But when we are thinking about cases, where books are telling some kind of wild west hero or old-timer social influential person, that thing would tell that those publications have been changed for some reasons. When we are analyzing the attitudes of the person they are forming in the younghood.
The way how teachers are explaining things are forming the way, how people see things, and of course, people are always against war. When we are looking at things like movements against the Vietnam war, we must realize that there is a couple of things what we must remember. There is a small difference if people are against war, or if people are against the war or campaigns what are made by the USA, and other wars have no mean. This kind of things might be seen, how people are writing about things, what have been happened in the past.
The thing is that the writers, whose texts are published are representing people, who are being young at a certain time, and that means that their attitudes are forming in the certain time in the past. That's why literature is a good window in the things, what government wants people to see. Politicians must know what people are thinking about things like oversees relationships because this kind of things is becoming more and more important.
The published text is showing somehow the attitudes about people, who are leading the cultural things. And culture is one of the best ways to influence to so-called normal people opinions. When we are thinking about the text, it can transfer feelings, what the living picture cannot transmit. By using text the feelings can transmit precisely. And when we are thinking the text itself, we must remember that the text itself is independent of the platform, where it is published. That's why we should separate Gutenberg from the text what is published.
Litterature or so-called official writings is a very good tool for deciding the attitudes in society. If some publishings are prohibited or censored, that means that something is embarrassing about those texts or writings. There are two ways to make censorship. Another is the official censorship, which is made by authorities, and the other way is that the publishers just refuse the co-operation with writers, whose texts are not pleasing them or the people, who are behind those firms.
But the opposite or mirror-version of the censorship is the books and writings, what are marketed by strong volume. Strong or high-level marketing is telling that somebody, who has money wants that everybody should read those texts. And if the government shares some texts to its officials or quests, that means that in those texts is the agenda, what the government wants to represent for everybody.
That text might be the book, what is written by the leader of the state, what means that the book is offering the window to the mind of national leader, and how the top man wants to see things. And how that person arguments things like how that person became the candidate for the elections, and other cases that would bring the light to decision for staying in power over a couple of elections.
Those things are important when other governments are planning the strategies for that nation and the policy for other nations. If the writer has a strong influence on the internal politics of that nation the profile of that person is very important.
The literature, what is brought to markets by so-called official publishers is the window to the society. And the reason for that is that the writers who are selected by publishers are so-called leading persons in the cultural society and those people want always to be people, who have attitudes and opinions about many things like the environment and social problems. That kind of persons is really good examples, what the people think about some things.
If the books are telling stories about heroism and other important things like wars, that thing tells about growing national spirit. But when we are thinking about cases, where books are telling some kind of wild west hero or old-timer social influential person, that thing would tell that those publications have been changed for some reasons. When we are analyzing the attitudes of the person they are forming in the younghood.
The way how teachers are explaining things are forming the way, how people see things, and of course, people are always against war. When we are looking at things like movements against the Vietnam war, we must realize that there is a couple of things what we must remember. There is a small difference if people are against war, or if people are against the war or campaigns what are made by the USA, and other wars have no mean. This kind of things might be seen, how people are writing about things, what have been happened in the past.
The thing is that the writers, whose texts are published are representing people, who are being young at a certain time, and that means that their attitudes are forming in the certain time in the past. That's why literature is a good window in the things, what government wants people to see. Politicians must know what people are thinking about things like oversees relationships because this kind of things is becoming more and more important.
The published text is showing somehow the attitudes about people, who are leading the cultural things. And culture is one of the best ways to influence to so-called normal people opinions. When we are thinking about the text, it can transfer feelings, what the living picture cannot transmit. By using text the feelings can transmit precisely. And when we are thinking the text itself, we must remember that the text itself is independent of the platform, where it is published. That's why we should separate Gutenberg from the text what is published.
Comments
Post a Comment