Diversity in working life part III (When a different kind of person has superior to us)

Diversity in working life part III (When a different kind of person has superior to us)

One example of the cases, where the majority is not right is when the boss of the company has a different opinion than henchmen because the boss is superior or otherways saying, in a different and this case higher position than others. This is the thing in the position of the boss or leaders and directors. They are giving rules, and other people must follow those orders. If that thing doesn't please, the henchman can start to ask for a new job.

When we are talking about the diversity of working life, we always forget one golden thing in that thing. What if that different person is our superior? What would we do in this case? So even if we would sometimes in our younghood selected workplace, where we can be with similar people, what we are, we might face the situation that the company has been sold and the new owner would come from the Saudi-Arabia.

In that case, we can, of course, change our working place, and say the reason for that is we want to be with similar people, what we are. In that case, we might have a  big problem with the attitudes, if the policy in the company has been that the benefit of the majority has always been first. In that case, the problem is that we cannot kick owners out of the company, and if they would put some controller for us, we cannot kick that person out of the office.

The thing is that in some cases the new owners would use the observer, who would meet new workers and explore ways, what might cause adjusting for the behaves and tradition in some companies. The thing is that in those cases the henchmen must just follow the rules, what the new bosses would give, or they can find a new job.

But when we are facing minorities or different kinds of people in working life, we must ask, why those people give challenges? If somebody talks a little bit slower than others, there might be the reason, that person is the translator, whose home language is a little bit different than other people's language.

And that case would cause things, that we must speak a little bit slower or listen a little bit longer when that person will find the correct words. But those cases would not be problems. This is one version of diversity. So if we think that we can just follow the will of the majority, we must realize, that business life is not democracy.

Owners of companies are giving rules, how people should act in the workplace. And in modern life, we must realize that ownership of the company can change all the time. If the owners would be foreigners or the foreign company has brought our workplace, we can do only one thing. Follow the rules and start to flex, or we can start to make new job applications. The bosses would give orders and others must follow those rules. This is the way in modern working life.

How to recognize the psychopath in the interview?

How to recognize the psychopath in the interview?

How to recognize the psychopath in the interview, is a very important question. This question has one answer, and that is not "there is nothing, how to recognize psychopaths because they are so clever, and handsome people". In the first sight, the psychopath might seem like the normal person, and that person might feel really nice. But then the image would change when the interview continues. The thing, how the psychopath would answer the questions is the thing, what will uncover that nature. The answers, what psychopaths are giving are actually very clever, and they can give impressing  CV:s and examples of the work, what those people have been done.

But then the focus in those works is actually, that the person would "only" lead the teams, and they would ever make anything self. And the attitude in the speech of the psychopaths is making the profit in the company is enough, and there is no matter about the way how the money is made. When we are thinking the nature of the psychopaths they have not social conscience and the thing in the social situations is that the psychopath would always be in the side of the power.

That person opinion is that teasing in the workplace is tolerated if the boss allows mental violence against the weaker person. And the very good signal about psychopathy is that the opinion of that person changes every time when the boss or majority of the team would allow cheating and teasing. The main character of the personal behavior and social skills of a psychopath is that they are always want to be in the side of the power.

The way, how psychopath manipulates people is a very nice and impressive combination of the flattering and pointing the weaker people from the team. And one of the most influential way to manipulate people is to inform the bosses about the things, what is happening in the team. In those cases, the person would tell many things, what might be true at first sight, but while telling that thing the person would tell things by making that inmates own role in the successes larger than it really is.

That makes the situation more complicated than we can ever imagine. The thing in this kind of case is, that the person can really be a good worker, and that person can also be made mainly the project. The thing is that the psychopath would also play the victim in the cases of teasing, and try to involve the support groups of those people, who have been victims of that thing.

And the psychopaths can also be good actors, but in the cases, where people are talked about the bothering and another kind of things in the workplace or private life, that person, who has no social conscience would sometimes say, that the boss or workplace should punish the victim. The thing is not like that. The teasers must get the punishment, not the person, who is targeted to that action, what can break the mind of that person.