What is typical?

Is the Shelby cobra GT.350 the most typical car in the world? Or was that car the most common car in the world or even in the USA when it first time rolled out from the factory in 1965? That legendary car is back in production again. But the image portrays the 1965 model. The car is classic, but are those classics very often today?

Media is the place where the extraordinary is turning regular things. Typical news and articles are handling superlatives or something very extraordinary things. Things like the fastest aircraft, tallest buildings, and tallest trees fill all articles. When we are looking at media, we might think that regular people are misters or they are some kind of president. We might think that a regular Russian is Vladimir Putin. When we look at war movies we might think, that all U.S. soldiers are fighter pilots or some SEAL team members. 

We might think that a regular person in the western world is some kind of millionaire. If we look at car magazines we might think that all people are driving muscle cars. We might think that Shelby GT.350 is the most common car in the world. That car is over 50 years old. And maybe somebody put there the electric engine series. But otherwise, those cars are mainly in a museum or some movies. 

Is SR-71 a typical aircraft? That aircraft is well-known. But is it a typical U.S. aircraft, even in the military sector? 

So what is typical?

How good a question. The universe where we live is the only known universe in the third dimension. Because we don't know other universes, the universe where we are living is typical for us. Same way if we only see skyscrapers and we ever go out from an area where are skyscrapers we might think that skyscraper is the typical house where people are living. 

If we see only people who are similar to us, we might think that we are typical people. The thing is that we might think very extraordinary things very ordinary. When we are reading about things like scientific writing we might think that typical researchers are working with a Large Hadron accelerator in CERN. And typical physicists are working with some kind of Higgs boson research. 

Almost all published scientific stories about particles are connected with the Large Hadron collider and Higgs boson. But we can say that those things are not typical. They are the most high-energy particle and the most high-energy tools in physics. But the fact is that those superlatives are far away from the typical scientific tools. 

Same way if we think about the SR-71 "Blackbird" and the stories that are published about the fastest aircraft in the world we might think that the typical recon plane is some kind of SR-71. The fact is that the most unusual airplane in the world is not the SR-71 that is retired. 

Superlatives are fascinating things. They are always interesting. We might find the tallest tree in the world from the Guinness book of records or Wikipedia. 

That tree is Coastal redwood in California. But regular trees are a little bit shorter. But what if we spend our entire life in the forest where are only coastal redwoods? We might think that coastal redwoods are typical trees on our planet. 

So extraordinary fills most of the articles in the world. And that means we are facing one thing. Most of the articles and facts that are searched and written handle very extraordinary things. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_tallest_trees

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_SR-71_Blackbird

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sequoia_sempervirens

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shelby_Mustang

https://fromplatoscavetoreality.blogspot.com/

A positive personality defends people against fake news.

"Wuerzburg psychologists have studied what makes people more susceptible to fake news. Credit: Jan Philipp Rudloff / University of Wuerzburg" (ScitechDaily/Psychologists: Dark Personality Traits Make People Susceptible To Fake News)

People with dark and negative personalities believe fake news more often than positive personalities. This is the thing, that psychologists found when they research what kind of personalities are the most vulnerable to fake news. Or is it that, those dark personalities just don't react to fake news? 

There is a possibility that dark personalities don't just react to lies that they see. So they don't mention if they see fake news. And the reason for that is maybe in their traumatic past. 

Maybe those dark personalities are afraid to tell if they see things like fake news. The reason for that is negative personalities afraid that if they are giving some negative feedback or simply saying that they don't believe something those people are closed away from their society. 

The thing is that many negative personalities are advancing when the person gets negative feedback. So that thing causes social apathy where the person would not ever react to lies and fake news. 

When all answers or attention that person gets is negative. That causes a situation where the person will not even want to tell about fake news or participate in discussions. The person will not even want to tell if they see lies or fake news.

So those people do not necessarily believe things that they see. They might not tell that they see lies in some text or video. Negative feedback about their attempt to get attention causes negative people don't even care to say anything if they see lies. 

The reason for that is maybe that people with dark personalities are lonely. They spend more time on the net. They have fewer discussion partners than positive people. 

And then another thing is that fake news is more often negative. So negative people are following negative news. And the reason for that is that people are searching for support for their way to see things. 

Fake news is offering lonely people the possibility to spend more time with things that are not true. But those things offer information that nobody knows first and better. 

When we think of negative personality, we must ask why people became negative. Maybe that thing explains why negative people believe lies more often than positive people. 

Or do they? Maybe the thing is that negative personalities are not saying so often if they see fake news or somebody tells lies in some discussion forum. The reason for that is that those people are afraid that they are closed away from that social network. 

https://scitechdaily.com/psychologists-dark-personality-traits-make-people-susceptible-to-fake-news/

https://artificialintelligenceandindividuals.blogspot.com/

The use of AI requires data security.

 The use of AI requires data security.

In the beginning, I must say that modern malicious software is searching data. It opens back gates to the system. And then that sends data to the third party. Another thing is that in most security scenarios the destructive viruses are used to open roads to the data breakers. Those people can try to slip non-secured components into the system. 

This component can send the entire data to the attacker's system. It is not the same does the computer virus infects the server or the workstation. If the computer shuts down sometimes. That clears the virus from the RAM. Servers are vulnerable because if RAM-virus infects them it would not be removed from RAM-memory until the next boot. Servers are also involving most of the data. 

That is stored in the system. So that means if the spy tool is infecting the server. That requires that the operators must change passwords and other access keys to the system. Computer viruses are always advancing and hackers are always finding new weak points of the system. They might take things like routers of the system to target. And double the entire data flow of the system. Then they can route the other data flow to their servers. 

If we are thinking of the form of the AI. That is "only" a database where is stored the solutions for a certain type of problem. Or actually, those databases involve information that the system uses to respond to a certain type of data. The data that travels in the system activates a certain database. And then the AI can solve problems. 

Machine learning means that the computer can automatically grow the data mass. And make connections between databases. The automatically learning machines can also call "open systems". The "closed" or "fixed systems" require that the operators are involving the solution. And the fixed system doesn't grow the data mass or connections between databases without operators. 

Anyway, without those databases the AI is helpless. If the computer viruses hit those databases. The system would turn useless. This means that also the AI requires virus scanners against data viruses. The data viruses are normally detected when they attempt to write themselves to hard disks. 

But there are also RAM viruses that are remaining in RAM. Those viruses are hard to detect. The virus doesn't write its code to hard disks. So the virus scanners are not able to see that thing. 

This is why they are called Stealth-viruses. But also the regular computer viruses require to download their code to the RAM-memory of the computer. Regular computer viruses are normally acting always the same way. They are involving virus code. 

The virus writers normally pack that malicious code in the form of EXE or COM-file that is only renamed for looking like an innocent file. 

The next type of virus is easy to deny. The write protection of Autoexec was enough. And the new operating systems didn't include that file. so making this kind of virus was suitable only in Windows 9X.

Then the program that is some kind of macro as an example the BAT file just replaces the last line in the "Autoexec.Bat"  by the command line that renames the virus file ("virus" to Virus.exe). Replacement of autoexec.bat happened by simply deleting Autoexec and replacing it with the macro that is renamed to Autoexec.Bat. And then it will activate the virus at the next boot session. Or sometimes there was only a command what deletes the system files. 

Modern virus scanners are scanning also the code what the files involved. And if there is some kind of virus code. The firewall and anti-virus program sends the information of that virus to the network control. And that might close even the internet connection of the systems. Also denying the echoing commands and auto-driving programs can protect computers against viruses. 

But computer viruses still exist. Modern malicious code is meant to steal information. They are more complicated than some viruses of the '90s. Those new viruses are also destroying only things like databases. And they can cause more damages than some virus that destroys the entire data system. If only the databases are destroyed. And the system is not used very often. That thing can cause a "nasty surprise" for people who should use the system. 

https://nexthop.ca/it-news/common-types-of-computer-viruses/

https://www.pandasecurity.com/en/mediacenter/security/4-steps-avoid-viruses/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AUTOEXEC.BAT

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_virus

Image: https://www.pandasecurity.com/en/mediacenter/security/4-steps-avoid-viruses/

How does the Internet effects history writing, from the point of view of 50 years in the future?

When a historian writes a book we must ask should that book please the audience? If research brings something new but uncomfortable things about the well-known person, should that thing keep secret? Or should that thing tell to the whole world? Even if that thing is breaking the myth or legend the historian should uncover those things. But there are always people who are not accepting something. 

Should the researcher tell only things that people want to hear? Or should they uncover also other things? Those things are sometimes hidden from a great audience because they are uncomfortable. And what would you think about the cases like some respected statesman changing the land area of the homeland to the half-liter whiskey bottle? Should people know about that kind of thing? That thing is an example and not basing the real case. In some cases, the people who were the close comrades of some great person are covering the myths very sharply. 

And if something is against the public image of some person that thing causes anger. The criticism is a nice thing. But it doesn't mean that the researcher should lynch. Because the text that this person would not please somebody. If some text causes a violent reaction that means it has mean. Meanless texts don't bring cat-size letters on the front page of the newspapers. 

What historians will write about us 50 years later? What kind of sources do they use? Today researchers are researching the people. Those who lived about 50 years ago use their diaries as the source. When we are thinking about things like Facebook and other social media. Things what those people wrote on social media meant to publish. In social media, people want to introduce themselves from the best point of view. 

And that's why some people say that social media is not a trustworthy source about the things how people are handling things and how people think about something. But is diary or old fashion paper writing the objective port to the mind of people? The thing is that diaries are always the window to thoughts about people. 

But still, there is one thing, that we must remember. The writings that are written in diaries are the things that people want to read later. So diaries are also offering a window to the mind of the person. But when a person writes things like diaries there is still the opinion of how the writer wants to handle things. When we are writing diaries there is always the possibility that the diary is not introducing all truth. 

X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X

Should researchers write only things that the audience wants to read? Or should they also write about things that might be uncomfortable for somebody? 

The meanless looking things can be great things of the private life of the person whose biography is written. And should that kind of thing also bring in the front of the eyes of the readers? 

X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X

The person who writes the diaries might remember that some other person can read it. So there might be only things, what the writer of diary wants to handle. But how trustworthy diary is anyway? The thing is that there are many types of diaries. And some diaries meant for supporting the decisions. 

The project diaries are meant to tell the project team what is done in the project. But when we are thinking about personal diaries, which are not meant for a public audience, we must remember that they might involve things that are not nice to read. 

So should the historian remove things like the drinking problem from the research which object is the person who died a couple of tens of years ago? This is a good question. The fact is that the heirloom of the person might not want to handle that kind of thing in public. 

But when we are thinking about the things like the statesmen or very public people. That kind of thing affects the decisions. When we are thinking of some people as idols or national heroes, we want to see them as the "pure boys". We don't want to hear things like alcoholism because it breaks the myth in front of our eyes.

That is one problematic thing in the research of history we always offend somebody's emotions. There is always somebody who doesn't like that personal life of some respected person hides tragedies. And that thing is problematic. If the historian writes only things that are supporting the myths that means the research is meanless. 

The purpose of research is to bring new points of the way to those topics. If the researcher just repeats the mantras that are told before. Or refer to some other texts that thing would not bring new things in the topics. Those texts and tales can be very nice to read.

But they are not research. The writer can make some research for the book. But we must remember that they are not meant for study books. Maybe there are some historical characters. But they are novels or fiction. Those books are sold in the bookstore. Some of them are found in Christmas gifts. But their place is on the fiction shelf. 

https://thebrightchronicle.blogspot.com

Kaspar Hauser the most well-known orphan in history

Kaspar Hauser the most well-known orphan in history

Kaspar Hauser (1812-1833) was one of the most mysterious cases in the history of Europe. He came from nowhere to Nuremberg at the age of 16. When we are looking at the sources, the birthday has sometimes claimed to be 28 or maybe 30 April or 29 September 1812 and where those days have been found is not mentioned. I have written many times about this boy, who came from nowhere and faced his fate at the age of 21 by the hand of an assassin, whoever captured. The mysterious case began, when the young boy walked to the military barrack and gave the letter, what is claimed to write by his mother. There is a couple of source after this text, and you might check those persons names from those links. 

He could only say the words "I want to become an officer like my father" and then the word "horse", what he. repeated twice, or this is how that thing has been documented. There are many documents on the internet, and that's why I don't start to write about the story, what you can read from the net, but here I must ask one question, what is seen by the face of that boy.

The question is Kaspar Hauser one member of the family of Napoleon Bonaparte?

It is suspected that Kaspar Hauser lived in one single room in the early years of his life. That boy was mentally normal, which means that there was some kind of very important reason, why he was kept in the locked room. But there are a couple of remarkable things that people who have investigated this case have been noticed and the first one was that Kaspar had very soft feet. And the second one was that he walked like a drunk, which meant that he might have a problem with direction instinct, or he was drunk but the alcohol can be given him with injection straight to the blood. Was this injection mean lethal or was it given to confess the guards, that the boy was dead? And if that thing is true, some of the people, who were near him might be that person who took him near Nurenberg.

That thing is causing suspicious that somebody might have tried to kill that boy on that day when he arrived in the city of Nuremberg 26th April 1828. Maybe the murderer has given too little alcohol, and Kaspar survived in that attempt. Maybe the killer has given alcohol and then left the unconscious boy to die. The thing, that makes this case so interesting is that nobody seems to see, where that boy came. The soft feet gave a very weak hint about the conditions, where he was kept. The thing is that he was kept on the soft floor, and in the room, what was tall enough that Kaspar could stand.

 And because he could walk, somebody had given him a model that he could learn that skill. Or in some bad jokes is claimed that Kaspar Hauser has been in the space station, because of zero gravity conditions are making balance very bad. And that kind of thing will explain the teetering walk. And maybe that thing would offer a very good topic for some novel, where Kaspar Hauser has been trapped in Solar Warden. But let's continue more seriously. When we are thinking about the end of that boy, we must realize that after the first strike, where he got the scar on his forehead, that thing might be made also by the woman. 

The weapon was the meat knife, what looked like an ax, and that would mean that killer acted in panic. That means that this person might think that Kaspar could recognize the attacker. And when the attacks were made, that boy must be taken to another city and protected better. The second attack that was faithful lets many questions open. The injuries, what that boy got were not killed immediately. So is it possible that those attacks were made for setting up that person dead, and maybe somebody changed the identity of that young man?

Lord Stanhope had that kind of relationship that this kind of thing can be done. And did Stanhope knew something, what other people didn't know? He was a very high-rank member of the British government, and that means that this kind of person would not walk anywhere without a good reason. 

And that tells that the killer has not skills to make that thing. There is a theory that Kaspar was a member of some royal family. If that thing was fake, the people who were behind that kind of case were behind those attacks they might not want to kill that boy. The acted murder attempts would make the story more effective and convincing but then the attacker just made a mistake. The question is how much Kaspar knew about the stories, that he was a member of some royal family? But those violate actions make his story famous.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kaspar_Hauser

https://www.edubloxtutor.com/kaspar-hauser/

Upper Image:

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/32/Hauser_Kreul.jpg

Downer Image:

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/2f/Kaspar_hauser.jpg/250px-Kaspar_hauser.jpg

The Jersey Devil

The Jersey Devil

Is this devil the fictional tale, hybrid animal or the recon drone of aliens?

This tale is very fascinating. And the origin of the tale would be the key to solve that mystery. Is the "Jersey Devil" only the tale? Or is it some hybridization of animals like Horse and Narwhal, what some person has tried to create, for creating the "Unicorn". Or in some theories that thing might be the recond drone of humanoids. 

Is the original tale from the Jersey Island at British channel or New Jersey from the opposite side of Atlantic? When I 'm thinking about this particular story, I have sometimes thought, that is it possible that the name for that story and monster are caused because the storytellers were the settlers from the Jersey Island, and moved for some reason to America. But this might be a too simple explanation for that thing, what has earned a story in the Readers Digest.

One of the most extraordinary monster tales is the tale of "Jersey devil", the creature, what looked like some kind of combination with the horse, bat, and some kind of beast. The thing that makes this tale very interesting and different is that the origin of that story might be at Jersey Island, which is part of the Channel Islands near the coast of France. The thing, why I think that the origin of that monster is in Europe, is that it is called the monster of Jersey.  

The thing that this tale is connected to New Jersey is really interesting because there is lots of distance between Jersey island and New Jersey what are the opposite side of the Atlantic Ocean. And dropping the word "New" is remarkable. So maybe this tale has been told first at Jersey, but then it transformed to handle the case, what is happened in New Jersey and what is, I hope fiction. 

Did the tale transform, because of the tellers' afraid something?

The mystery of that tale is that it has been changed, and the thing is that was it changed because of the tellers of that story afraid authorities and the death penalty for witchcraft. Or is there something else, what those people afraid? 

So the thing is that there might be the very dark background of this tale, and that is it possible that the "Jersey Devil" was some kind of hybridization? Is the person, who created that hypothetical creature tried to create the Unicorn? The thing is that there is the strange claiming that the Unicorn was the hybridization of the Narwhal and Horse. But as I wrote this kind of theory are the only hypothesis, but is it possible that somebody has got success in that attempt. 

The thing that makes this particular tale very interesting is that it has got the place in Readers Digest. And there is something, what somebody wanted to hide. And of course, one explanation of the Jersey Devil is that it is the recon drone of humanoids. The secret remains, and the mystery is still fascinating to many people in the world. 

(1)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jersey_Devil

A couple of films about this topic:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C33HiCDlwGg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BRx0P3AS_1Y

Image 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jersey_Devil#/media/File:Jersey_Devil_Philadelphia_Post_1909.jpg

Cosmos, biology and strange tales about giants

Cosmos, biology and strange tales about giants

What somebody doesn't want us to know about giants (1)?

In the image, what is connected to this text is two rocks in Roque Nublo area Gran Canaria, and the tale tells that those rocks are remaining of two giants, who were stoned in that area. This is not the only tale about this kind of thing. Giants were quite popular characters in the Medieval tales. Also, Titans (2) were giants, and the origin of those stories is in Antique Greece. Sometimes there is claiming or theories that the Titans were the silicone-based lifeforms (3). 

And if we are thinking about those giants, they might have space suits, what were hot inside. But this is only a hypothesis or theory. The only thing, that can say is true is that somebody has told many stories of those mysterious creatures. But why those stories have been told is a mystery.

This tale is, of course, one of the most well-known stories about giants, and those stories are many times feeling hoaxes or just the tales, what are told because of fun. But sometimes we must realize, that there is something incredible and mysterious about this kind of story, what is fascinating and the imaginational. 

The stories of giants are the origin of the thing, what is called as cosmology and research of life in the universe.

When we are thinking about SETI-program, we must understand that searching the extraterrestrial lifeforms from the universe is a hopeless mission, if we have not the model, what kind of lifeforms can be existed. The thing is that those lifeforms must not be similar to what we are. 

The alien might not be a vegetable or animal. The alien could have the skin, what has the ability for photosynthesis

And the second thing is that they must not have the ability to live on earth. That means that even if we cannot do something, those aliens could do some other things, and the idea is that if those species would be formed on some planet they are fully adapted to the conditions of that planet. 

So the thing is that those aliens might have skin, which would have the ability for photosynthesis, and that means that the "green men" might be true. If those aliens would have skin, what makes them able to create chlorophyll for photosynthesis in their skins, that means that those aliens would not even have to get oxygen for life. In those cases, the skin of the alien creates the necessary oxygen for that hypothetical species.

What about protective suits, where could grow the cells for creating oxygen and nutrient in those suits?

But then we must realize that the purple-molecule can also act as the photosynthetic element. That means that if the alien would have that molecule in the skin cells, the alien would be red. But there is a possibility that the extraterrestrials have a biomechanical protective suit. In that very advanced suit would be transparent tubes, where could grow the cells, which can create the oxygen and nutrient for an astronaut. 

The thing is that those aliens might have protective suits, where are cells, what is giving life support. In those protective suits, the photosynthetic cells would be in the tubes, where they would get nutrients, and those biomechanical suits might have the ability to grow the same cells for nutrients for the astronauts. 

The silicon-based life forms (4)

In the end, we must say that there is a possibility that some lifeforms could be silicone base. That means that those creatures will turn to mountain crystal if silicone would touch with water, and that means those creatures would be stoned on Earth. 

That kind of hypothetical lifeform would need extremely high temperatures and a totally dry area. This means that this kind of creature would need the spacesuit, where its extremely high temperature. So those creatures would need near 200 degrees celsius for operating. And if the suit will be broken, that creature will turn to mountain crystal. 

(1)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vjq3qKH-nQg

(2)

https://www.greekmythology.com/Titans/titans.html

(3)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4GmGO__75NY

(4)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypothetical_types_of_biochemistry

Image:

https://travel.usnews.com/Canary_Islands/Things_To_Do/Roque_Nublo_Gran_Canaria_63072/

What was the purpose of Ancient Egypt?

Image I

What was the purpose of Ancient Egypt?

One of the greatest mysteries in history is the lost of Ancient Egypt. Where went the civilization what existed over 2000 years if we want to calculate pre-dynastic periods for that civilization, what is well known about its mummies, treasuries, and pyramids. The question is, why that civilization lost? I know that this thing seems a little bit crazy, but sometimes I have thought that the Egyptian dynasties were some kind of project, what was establish by Pharaohs Scorpion(1) and Narmer(2), or something, that supported the power of those people. The first Pharaoh who is mentioned is Ka(3), who claimed to be the ruler of the predynastic period

Those Pharaos were the first rulers of Egypt, and Scorpion was the man, who conquered Thebes, and Narmer was the man, who united upper and downed Egypt under one leader. So we might think that those men were establishers of Egypt. Maybe the idea for establishing Egypt was given by Ka. But we don't know is that the real person, or some kind of myth, what was told to serve the first Pharaos, that there was somebody before them. 

So when those persons began the project, were they meant that the project was someday ended, and the existing of Ancient Egypt was finally ended, when Julius Caesar conquered that land and made that area the province for the Roman empire. But if Ancient Egypt meant to be ended someday, we must ask the purpose of that thing? Was Egypt meant to serve only one person, and the high priests of their gods? 

Or was it something bigger than we ever have thought? 

Was the mission of the Egyptian kingdom just protect adapting something to the Earth? And what was that "something"? The thing is that we don't know, but was there something hiding in those palaces and temples, what couldn't walk with normal people, but what was powerful? 

And was that thing connected to the gods of Ancient Egypt? Was there some kind of intelligence in those palaces, who didn't want to show the faces? Was that intelligence so powerful and sharp, that those Pharaos wanted to listen to that thing, what was hiding behind the back of Pharaoh? 

When we are thinking about the religion of Ancient Egyptians, there was something, that is not seen anywhere else. When Egyptian Pharaos rise to power, they started to build Pyramids for their graves. And then those crypts were filled by gold, what was meant for the gift to priests, who supported the Pharaoh and his power. This thing was a really interesting point of view when we are thinking about the rulers of Egypt. 

Akhenaten (Amenhotep IV) (4) and his strange family. Was he some kind of body switch? 

The price of those very expensive funerals was really big, and the thing is that the Pharaoh Akhnaten changed the religion to monotheistic, and he started to obey the astral and spiritual god. So the religion that Akhenaten had was a little bit similar, with the ancient Hebrews, and the thing is that the power of Pharaoh has culminated in Akhenaten. There is claiming that the word "Amen" is from the name "Amenhotep IV", what Akhenaten used before he changed the religion. 

Sometimes I have thought, could that man be so-called body switch? That means that the original Pharoah could be murdered and changed to another person. Or was he advised by some aliens? That is one good question. In the image, what I have connected to this text, the Akhenaten is portrayed with his family, and those children seem somehow very advanced. So are those children the answer to the myth of Ancient Egypt and why Akhenaten acted as he acted? 

So what was the reason, why Akhenaten decided that the only allowed god was Aton? The thing is that when Pharaoh was grown in palaces and temples the priests gave that man the mission. There were plans and objectives, what Pharaoh should do during the period in power. The idea for changing the religion and the capital from Thebes to Akhetaten or Amarna(6), what was created by Akhenaten must be brought by some high-rank priests. 

That would explain, why Akhenaten was allowed to make those things. When he died his name removed from the list of Kings, but the legend remains. He cut the religious tradition, and that caused the collapse of Egypt many centuries later. But there was something, that protected that man, who maybe is one of the most mystic creatures in history. 

The man who began the revolution, and then he could not root the changes and reforms of the religion in that country. So who protected him? Were some high-priests behind him, or were the mystic children what are claimed as hybrids something to do with that protection?

(1)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scorpion_II

(2)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Narmer

(3)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ka_(pharaoh)

(4)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Akhenaten

(5)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amarna

Image I

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stela_of_Akhenaten_and_his_family#/media/File:GD-EG-Caire-Mus%C3%A9e066.JPG