The "Grand Unified Theory" or GUT and the idea of how GUT influences to theoretical material research?

The "Grand Unified Theory" or GUT and the idea of how GUT influences to theoretical material research?

This theory is one of the most interesting and mysterious parts of science. The thing that is making that thing so interesting is that it would connect all existing theories of the natural forces under one theory.

So it will combinate the Gravity, electric force, with weak and strong nuclear forces, but the thing is that nobody has ever created the formula, what would combinate those forces, and the mathematicians and physicians from Albert Einstein to Stephen Hawking have tried to create the formula, what would connect all theories under one theory.

The thing, that makes this theory remarkable, is that it would give answers to the things, what are connecting material and energy to the time and gravity. The thing is that the key to creating that theory is gravity. If we could explain the form and direction of gravity, we would be a step closer to "the Grand Unified Theory" (1) or "Theory of Everything" (TOE) (2) or simply GUT. I know that those theories are often mentioned being different, but in fact, some people think that TOE needs GUT for being created, and that's why they should be handled as one theory.

So I have written about gravity many times, and the thing is that things should not be. Gravity would cause movement, which turns to impact energy or heat when the particle hits to another. That energy is a form of the electric force. If we would shoot the particle to the nucleus of the atom, that would cause the nuclear fission, if the nucleus is heavy enough. That particle must just pass the electron layers, and this is why the only suitable particle for that job, and sometimes the theorists have created the idea, that this thing, what is called fission is the form of impact energy.

And when the nucleus or nucleoid would face its anti version, it would blow the quarks away from each other causing the annihilation. So is annihilation some kind of lightning? Does that thing cause, that the electric force, what keeps particles in the same form would somehow nullify? This kind of thing would cause theory, that all forces are the same force, and that would have the active and passive energy form.

But the thing is that gravity would turn the particle moving objects or it can move objects together. And then the impact would release energy, what is coming from the movement. But the thing, what makes "Grand Unified Theory" so interesting is that it would answer the thing, could we somehow connect antimatter to the material without turning both particles to energy.

What if we can create material, where are only electrons? This kind of research is pure theory, and maybe we cannot ever connect antiparticle to particle, but we can always think the possibilities, what that kind of possibility gives to mankind.

In this theoretical material would be only electrons or protons, ad the problem is in handling the annihilation. What if we are thinking about the case that we could connect anti-protons to protons? That would help us to create the proton or electron networks, what is the most incredible material, what people can imagine. But the problem is that the electrons and protons would fly away because of the magnetic pulling effect. If we could create layers, where is only an example of electrons, we could create the ultimate material.

So those particles need the glue particle between them, and the suitable version would be the anti-particle of the same particle. If we would put positrons between electrons, that would help to create the ultimate layer. But the problem is annihilation. If those particles would touch together they would turn energy. The thing is that if we could use electrons and protons in those theoretical materials handling those particles would be easier than handling neutrons.

In theory, we can connect neutrons by putting the southern pole to the northern pole of neutrons together. That would create an extremely strong layer, but neutrons are harder to produce than electrons and protons. And this makes those particles easier to handle, but first, we must handle antimatter and annihilation.

(1)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_Unified_Theory

(2)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory_of_everything

Is time an illusion?

Is time an illusion?

1. What is the form of time?

Sometimes physics and other people are asked the definition of the time, and sometimes they got an answer, that time is a form of energy. The idea is that when the particles are forming, the protons start to rotate, and this rotation is called "spin".

This rotation would lose the energy or forces, which keeps the particle of atoms together, and also the spin would cause that at the last the quarks, what are forming protons and neutrons are released. This thing has been proven, when the particles protons and neutrons are broken. This is the physics explanation for the thing, what is called time.

2. The energy is stable in the Universe

Sometimes people think that if we would target the electromagnetic radiation to atoms, we would make them exist forever. That thing is possible for a small group of atoms.  But the thing is that the energy is not forming, it's transferring from the place to another. There is a stable mass of energy in the Universe, and the energy is only changing its form.

It can be in the form of material, radiation or particles like electrons and quarks. And it can turn to another form. But if we want to make our universe live forever, we must open a wormhole to another dimension, what brings energy from outside. This kind of things might be the problem of the civilizations, what lives in the distant future.

3. What is the physical time?

The end of the time would be the situation, where the energy of the atoms will end. The atoms get energy for keeping the electrons on their trajectories from the outer source, and if that radiation emission would not exist, the atoms would start to break, because the rotation of electrons and the spin of those particles causes that the atom would finally break. And at least the spin of quarks is ending, which means that even the particles of the atoms would not exist.

Or actually, they exist, because there is the law in nature, what denies that material cannot vanish. It can turn to energy, and when we are thinking about the situation, that the final star and black hole is broken, those particles would exist in the form of energy. The level of the energy is so low, that it is almost invisible, but the energy exists. But if we are thinking about the time, we must find some other explanation for the thing, what makes us older.

4. Are telomeres the reason, that we are believing the time

Telomeres are small parts of the chromosomes, and they are getting shorter in each time when the cell is dividing. Those things would cause the aging process of the living organisms, and that might cause the illusion of the time. But there is a thing, what makes time very interesting phenomenon.

There is one idea, what would make the species of the distant future save the universe when the material ends. That thing is open the wormhole to some other dimension for bringing the energy from outside to this dimension, and that might save the universe.

We cannot live without time, and we can meter that thing by using a clock. So there would be the idea, that the time is the virtual force, which means that we can meter that thing, but it does not exist. And that has brought the idea, that the time is only decreasing the energy level in the Universe.

. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ME3sjezuckE