Is the reason for autism that there are "too many" certain type neurons in the human brain?

The math neurons are causing a question: is autism an anomaly about neuron groups that control certain skills. If the neuron group that is controlling mathematics skills is too dominating. That means there are fewer neurons for handling some other skills.

The discoveries like math cells in human brains are leading neurologists to track the origin of autism. The savant autism and math-cells are causing an idea that maybe autism is the disorder. In the relation in cell groups in human brains. The specialized neuron group is controlling every single skill that person has. That means there are "math neurons", "language neurons", "musical neurons", etc.

 And if there are "too many" neurons that are controlling some skill. That means there are fewer neurons that are controlling some other skill. Even if we have 300 billion neurons in the human brain every single neuron is responsible in its area. And every single neuron has the area where it's best. So that means autism can be an anomaly in the relations of the neurons that control certain skills. 

There is made new research about autism. And one sad thing that is seen. Is that sometimes undiagnosed autism is the thing. That is driven a person to suicide. This thing is reasonable because autism causes problems with social relationships. The need to be social is the thing that causes sad things. And I certainly hope that nobody must die because society wants them to be "normal". 

Modern society benefits good social skills, and that means a person, who has autism must always force and drive themselves to social contacts. Being different than others causes. Other people would start to show them with thumps. And being different means fear of being closed out from social relationships. 

Why people would not get autism diagnoses? The problem is that autism is the diagnosis that is stamped as "mental". This means that autism causes thoughts that this diagnosis has caused that person would kick out of school. 

Autism is a problem with social communication. And that means the autistic person must use more energy in social relationships than the so-called "normal" person. The problem is that society is benefiting so-called "normal" people who are social. And if there is some kind of anomalies in behavior. That means the person is "weird". And especially at a young age, that kind of thing is a catastrophe. 

This means that person would need more energy for creating social relationships. And that thing will bring extra pressure in the life. If the person must always concentrate on behavior and force being social. That thing can drive that person to self-destruction. And that thing is sad to read. 

So is autism the anomaly in the relations of the specific neurons that are controlling certain skills? 

Autism is one of the things that are not researched very well. Things like savant where the person has extraordinary skills in the very thin sector are causing the question, why some person can make the computer program or play some composition. But they cannot make things like cooking potatoes. There is no certain skill that savant autists have. 

Savant-autists might be extraordinarily talented music players. Or they might be extraordinarily talented mathematicians. That thing means that there is might be too many neurons. Those are needed for controlling some special skills. Researchers found so-called math cells in human brains. So there must be "music cells" and "language cells" and "computer programmer cells". 

The new findings like the math-cells in the human brain are causing theories that maybe autism is the disorder in the specialization of neurons. When we are looking at savant-autistic people we sometimes see extraordinary mathematical skills. And that thing means. That there is a possibility. That too many math cell is in their neural structure. So that means autism would be the disorder in the specialization process of the neurons. 

https://scitechdaily.com/high-rate-of-possible-undiagnosed-autism-discovered-in-people-who-died-by-suicide/

https://scitechdaily.com/specific-math-neurons-identified-in-the-brain/

https://scitechdaily.com/new-clues-to-autism-mystery-different-risk-genes-with-same-effects-on-brain-development/

https://scitechdaily.com/treatment-in-early-life-prevents-autism-symptoms-from-developing-in-mice/

 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autism

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Savant_syndrome 

https://thoughtandmachines.blogspot.com/

Why people should be poor?

Why people should be poor?

Why people should be poor?

"Keep them poor" is one very good motto for people, who want society, where people cannot advance by their own work. But why somebody wants to make the class-society, where the only couple of people would have real rights and the rest of people would be very poor?

 In that kind of societies, the thing is that this set would separate the high-class people from the ordinary people, and if so-called regular people would be poor, they would not have time to get education and rise in the hierarchy. If the people would be working all day in the heavy physical working, they would not know about better things, because they spend all day in the workplace, and then get home as tired, that they would not able to get an education.

Every people makes mistakes

In this model, the ruling class is hiding behind the mask of perfection, and that kind of things are seen in the way, how some people are sharing articles about persons like computer specialists. The computer workers or specialists like micro support people and programmers are people, who are working in the area, where is not many layers between the leaders and workers, and there might be not henchmen, who can be blamed if the work is not done well.


And that would make possible that the henchmen would see, that the boss is not a perfect man or woman. Those people would uncover only the regular members of Homo Sapiens species, who can make mistakes, and that removes the image of perfection. The reason why some people are fighting against things like artificial intelligence and social media is, the same in both cases.

All writings are not propaganda

The artificial intelligence would eliminate the method where some person can get the benefit because the handler of the information would not have time to read some things in the files. One of the things might be how many speeding tickets would some person get, and the second thing is that how many of the other drivers would get speeding ticket in the same size crossing of the speed limit in the same police district.

That would tell if somebody is a little bit "more equal" than others. Also, artificial intelligence would control equipment and that would give people more free time for hanging in the social media, and the social media can uncover that there is something wrong with the workplaces or attitudes of the bosses or other people, who would be hiding behind the image of perfection. But the major problem in social media is not that there are people, who are hanging in there all day.

Social media is a very effective tool for disinformation and propaganda. That thing is an effective tool for making contact with youngsters and giving them hardcore propaganda, but there is another point of view of that thing. There is also justified protests on the Internet, and that kind of things are really problematic for the police and military forces. If the protesters would just march across the city, would the situation handle by riot police and denying to publish the images of the protests.

Things always have two sides, and sometimes there is no right side

Of course, some provocation can break a couple of windows, what justifies the use of force to scatter the demonstration, what is defined as the riots, and breaking the property would give legislation and justification for using the violence against rioters. The social media would give another image of the demonstrators, and maybe we are wanted to see those things in some other point of view.

That means that there might be two very undemocratic parts against together, and this is the thing, what we have seen in Arab nations. There were dictators, who were replaced by new dictators after the Arab spring, who are continuing the same politics against their own people, and that thing means that the same way continues, but the faces in the official wall paintings are changed.

Things like social media would uncover things, like some very famous people would not have opinions at all. The thing, what makes social media very interesting thing, and that makes it problematic for the people, is that it is a very good environment to share information. Those solutions and environment are really easy to use, and they can be a very good tool for telling things, but there is a one really bad thing, In social media would be uncovering things that some very nice and cool person cannot talk about anything else than some clothes.