The alternative information is forming alternative reality

The alternative information is forming alternative reality

The alternative reality is one of the most incredible and at the same time dangerous things, what researchers, who are working with information theories have ever invented. This thing is distorting information because human beings are looking for company, what have similar opinions, what themselves have.

That means that the information, that people get can be from many sources, but it strongly polarized. That means that a great number of people can use the same sources, what can be faked, and that thing would cause the mass-effect on the Internet.

When we are looking at the perfect assistants for the information warriors or "trolls", what is the modern version of the world "propagandist", we might think one person. The people who could transform the faked information true in the mind of people could be the person, who is working in a trusted newspaper or news agency.

If a journalist, who is working in the qualified would believe the faked information, that thing would get the effect, what makes it trusted. And this is the thing, what we must realize. "Because that information seems real" is the comment, what might be used in the case, where the story in some national broadcast network is proven fake.

This is a really dangerous thing in modern information. We have lots of information, but we cannot say is it true or fake. When we are thinking about social media, we are facing the thing that we can get more information than ever before, and there is, of course, many people, who are acting for some kind of ideological organization.

And more interesting thing is that we cannot say, what is the ideology? Does a person even self notice, when the opinions what that individual would write or tell are ideologically polarized? If we are taught from childhood, that some ideology is bad, we believe that this thing is self-evidence. That means that ideology turns to more than politics.

This is a dangerous thing. When we are thinking about ourselves as social animals or creatures, we must realize that the willing to find the group, what has the same opinions, what we have is created to protect the group. But there is the risk, that we would be members of the small but very noisy and radical group. And that means that we might be surrounded by people. who have the same opinions, what we have.

That effect would be like blowing oxygen to flames, and that thing would exacerbate our opinions, what happens to every member of those groups. When we are hearing only polarized opinions, where every criticism is filtered away, that means that we are getting only information, which is supporting our own opinions. And we will transmit those opinions to our descendants, who might start to think that our ideology is "more than normal politics".

Diversity in working life part II

Diversity in working life part II

Many people think that diversity is just some physiological or psychological thing. The thing is that diversity can be that somebody has different kinds of education than somebody else in the workplace. That kind of thing can also cause challenges in the relationship with the working group.

So, diversity in working life can mean many more things than just ethnic or linguistic differences or be in some kind of sexual minority. That doesn't mean also handicap or illness, and we always forget one thing, which might make us different than others.

That he might be the different educational backgrounds in the working environment. Those things are almost every time we have forgotten to mention in the cases when we are talking about diversity. So when we are thinking about isolation and problems also nontypical training in working place can cause problems.

And sometimes some people are asking "why workplace would not be homogeneous. Does that mean why every person would not have the same education as leaders and directors? The thing is that controlling that kind of working society would be easy, but then we can ask one question: are every side of things noticed and research by every side by using the analytic methods?

So should somebody sometimes notice things like legal aspects of some decision? And should somebody advice leaders of the company in the technical questions? The thing is that the leadership of big companies is not an easy thing. And if things like copyrights and licenses are forgotten, that thing would cause very big losses and if the bought land area, what is meant for holiday or hotel use would be polluted there would be financial losses in this kind of case.

The purpose of hiring highly trained specialists for a company means that they will bring their knowledge and skills in the use of leaders of companies. Their mission is to support the leaders of the company and give advice on important questions. That means that those highly trained and highly paid people's mission is not to sit and be nobody in the company. Their mission is to give advises in the questions, where is needed some special skills, and one of them is the code of laws.

And in the big International environment, there are many special sectors, which have their own special trained people. In those cases, nobody handles all areas of business, legal and political fields. If the firm exports to the wrong country that can cause very bad problems with the authorities. If there are some limits in exporting products to that country those rules must be followed.

Children and attitudes

Children and attitudes

There is one really interesting thing about the behavior of children. People who are interesting in those things, and are advising parents, how they should grow their children are many times full of tattoos. Those people are thinking that they are really good advisors, to tell other people, how they should keep their children in strength.

Children are a very good indicator, what kind of attitudes parents have. If some person, who is under ten years is starting to wear gang clothes and play some soldier, at the home the situation is that parents are accepting and supporting that kind on advantage. In that kind of cases, parents are responsible for the advantage, what has been taken to that situation. Children are telling at schools and other places, what kind of attitudes their parents have, by using a very nasty method.

If some pupil is telling at school, that this inmate wants to be a gangster or some other pupil is telling that the aim of that person is being the member of a motorcycle gang, that thing is very interesting because in those cases somebody has told, that this kind of aims is acceptable. But when we are looking at those things a little bit closer, we are facing the delusion that some MC-gangs are controlling the society. In some publications of writings, what those persons have given in many places is stories about "the army of motorcycle men". In fact in many of that so-called "vest gangs" is militaristic strength. There might be an absolute dress code, that the person who has a certain rank in the group has the right to keep certain clothes.

As an example, black leather clothes are reserved for the bosses, and actually, those clothes are the mark of the position in the group. The worst insult, what person can make in those societies is to skip own leader and ask straight from the person, who is above own boss. In some gangs, the person, who is two-level below other members would not even get an answer, if that inmate asks the toilet or something like that.

This kind of thoughts is very interesting. Some of those persons are looking the public persons, who have visited in the "clubhouse" or headquarters of the motorcycle gangs. They are introducing wild visions, that in someday the real controller of the state is some kind of MC-gang, and in some other stories, the MC-gangs have the position as the official law enforcement.

Some people are writing about this kind of things, and if we would see the entirety of those people social community, they would have only bikers in their social environment. In those cases, those people might not even know others than some gang-members. And in those cases, that kind of things are very well seen in writings, what the journalist makes.

About difference and society

About difference and society


We have all heard the stories about hate between the families. And sometimes I have thought that is the hate between two groups of people coming from the era of cavemen. And in this case, we must think the situation, that some caveman has slept during the guarding, and that was caused the hate between that individual and another group. And of course, the friends of that person would be non-tolerated in the group of the cavemen, which lived about 10 000 years ago. And is it possible that the hate between the families is coming from that group?

Of course, the individual, who slept in the guard has also prosecuted the other guards, that they were not waking him up, and that caused the fight between the families because those individuals forced their wives and children in their side.  The human eye is an interesting organ because it turns to the target, what is different than others. The real and perfect way to write this thing is that the brains are separating the different things from the information, what our eyes bring to brains and those different things come to our knowledge easier than the things that are similar with others.

A reason for that ability is that that is a good way to separate leaders of the groups, and maybe that ability was forming when the caveman fought with Australopithecus apes and won them. Or at least, we are the species, what remains in life and Australopithecus send to history. The different looking persons were easier to mark at the other side, and then the group could attack them easier than the entire group, and the leaders were good targets for the bribes because they were leaders and easy to separate from the other group.

That is is one of the reasons, why everybody must look at the similar than others in the army or uniformed organization. Another is that the persons who look like similar would be easier to replace. The individual would stay in memory and cause problems because the other person cannot look like exactly that person. This would cause the leader can adhere to that person, this is why every low-rank military men must look exactly similar to the person next to him. That makes easier to sacrifice those men because they were part of the mass. And the team leaders have marked for their position. The ability to find the leader of the group is a very important thing when the own team prepares to fight. If the leader of the opponent is neutralized, they might go to panic or disorder, and that makes easier to cause fear on the other side.

The thing, what made somebody the leader of the group of cavemen is that individual knew the places, where that group could make the camp, and where to find the water. In that time the cavemen really lived in caves, and in the cold and long winters, they closed the entrance of the cave by using sand and stones. If there were allowed to find water in the cave, that villain could stay in that cave all long winter and wait for the spring. The leader of the team knew those caves, and that's why all group wanted to please that person.

And maybe the tradition of the headmen of the state is coming from that period. There is an interesting thought, what came in my mind, and if the tradition of the leadership is coming from the era of the cavemen, is it possible that the hate between the groups of people is coming also from that era. The thing is that would the reason for making murder coming from that far away from history.

The thing is that if the fear is in the heart of the leaders of the group, the opponent would not attack so easily. Maybe the way to make somebody the leader of the group has been so attractive, that even today we must have leaders of the nation to make decides how we must act. And of course, those leaders attract other leaders, what would follow the rulers. Sometimes is asked, why we must have rulers? But the way to act in the international or national environment is that somebody must become the leader of the nation, or there would be anarchy in the state.

When we are thinking about a democratic way to make orders, we must face one thing. Defending the scientific text is not a democratic thing. The thing what makes some things science is the cause of the simultaneous repeating happenings, what can be used for making theories, and theories must be proven true or false. The idea is not voting or organizing election campaigns are suitable for selection of the parliamentarians, but they are not a suitable way to defend the scientific text.

The thing in the scientific text must be proven, and in fact, we cannot be sure were the cavemen fought against Australopithecus. Or did those opponents have real leaders of the group, but the Cro-Magnon-cavemen had leaders. Or actually, we are those Cro-Magnon-people, who are learned to write and make other things, what are giving us the advantage and superior for the Australopithecus. But we can be sure that we somehow avoid contacting with different looking people than we are.

And maybe this kind of behavior is coming from the cavemen era. In that time different looking people meant that they were members of the competition team, and that means that they could be dangerous for the team, that knows the position of the source. Those palaces were wanted in the prehistoric period, and if the inner circle has leaked the location of that place would another group conquer that place. And if own team is weaker or the water is ended, the source would be gone forever.