Who likes Hierarchy?

Who likes Hierarchy?

In everywhere inside our society is some kind of hierarchy, this is the thing, what we must confess. Every team has a leader, whose mission is to make a different kind of particles like people, who have different backgrounds working together. And the leader has a responsibility, that the team does the work, as well it can. If somebody has problems with that, this means discussion. Hierarchy means that the leader, or person who is acting as a leader has power and authority to the workers, and that thing is always one of the most difficult things in the world.

The position of the leader is to be the representer of the supreme leaders of the company, and if there is something wrong in the team, that thing causes divorcement. So leaders are giving orders and henchmen are following those orders. This is the way, as it works. But then we must remember, that if the team leader would not give orders, the fault for unsuccessful action is the leader. And that's why the team leader must not think to be a member of the team. The position of the leader is being outside of the team, and the role is like a coach in some ice-hockey match. And if the thing goes wrong the person, who is responsible for those things should be found.

So this is one version of hierarchy, but some people like to keep the hierarchical pyramids. In this model is three or four levels of leaders in the organization, and in this model, somebody would start to work as a middleman. This person just looks at the order from the Email and then resends that thing to henchmen. That kind of person ever does anything and they just resend the emails. And this is the thing, what we must remember when we are thinking hierarchy.

What is the person's position in hierarchy?

Another person would carry responsibility, and that actor would just say, that other people have given orders. They couldn't do anything in the cases, where chemicals are delivered to nature. There is always somebody else, who has responsibility with that kind of thing, and the email has been sent, that there corrosion in the tube. But that kind of person is always against reforms. Their benefit is that the traditional way to make things is continuing in their environment.

At last, I must say something about hierarchy in social life. When somebody wants to replace the working democratic system with hierarchy, you should ask, what is that person's position in this system? Here we must remember, that all life is not spent on the work. We have also free time, where we are facing another kind of thing.

Sometimes people are thinking that democracy is always the best thing because the vote cannot be sold or buy. But when we are thinking about sports clubs, what is acting as trusts, we must ask, "how many times the chairman of those trusts have been selected, because that person can get a sale from the gynḿansiums".  Think about this, when you are reading this kind of thing.

The tools of effective leadership

The tools of effective leadership

Artificial intelligence is an effective tool for monitoring the work of the workgroup. The problem with leadership is that the leader must get proper and unfiltered information, what is going on in the workplace, and the most important thing is to realize, that persons who are spending their working time other things than working are causing payments for the company. But the problem is that those people can please the leaders, and they have excellent skills to blame other people for the wasted time.

They might say, that all of their time is reserved for giving advises to other workers, or they must fix the errors, what other people have made. And they also are very good to call other people to grill parties, which makes them sometimes very popular. There is, of course, a couple of persons, who would not get a call to those parties, but who cares. That would keep this kind of person popular.

The problem is that those people are not giving incomes for the company, and the thing is that they would break the entire community. Sometimes those people are well in their job but in that case, we should ask, why they are doing the jobs, what are ordered to other people, if the primary job of the person is something else than the advisor?

But the thing, what artificial intelligence can do is look for a thing, that person does with the computer during the working time. And if in the case is in some software coding corporation, the artificial intelligence would follow, how many marks would each programmer write. and also follow the error level of each worker. That thing tells about willing and ability to make the job.

The data that artificial intelligence would give is sometimes a little bit embarrassing. That can tell that the director of the company would look at pornographic videos in the working time, even if the same person has been denied every kind of extra media from the computers of the company. The thing how we could describe artificial intelligence, in that case, would be the system that gives neutral and real information for supporting the decision.

One of the things that are in a vital role in the cases, when people make right and effective decisions is to get the right information. If the information that is given is wrong or polarized, the decision is always wrong. The thing is that when people are made something wrong, they would want to hide this kind of thing, or they don't dare to say if somebody has given the wrong advice. That kind of thing is the most important to understand, that if we would want to make the right decisions, we must get every information, what we can get.