Who likes Hierarchy?
In everywhere inside our society is some kind of hierarchy, this is the thing, what we must confess. Every team has a leader, whose mission is to make a different kind of particles like people, who have different backgrounds working together. And the leader has a responsibility, that the team does the work, as well it can. If somebody has problems with that, this means discussion. Hierarchy means that the leader, or person who is acting as a leader has power and authority to the workers, and that thing is always one of the most difficult things in the world.
The position of the leader is to be the representer of the supreme leaders of the company, and if there is something wrong in the team, that thing causes divorcement. So leaders are giving orders and henchmen are following those orders. This is the way, as it works. But then we must remember, that if the team leader would not give orders, the fault for unsuccessful action is the leader. And that's why the team leader must not think to be a member of the team. The position of the leader is being outside of the team, and the role is like a coach in some ice-hockey match. And if the thing goes wrong the person, who is responsible for those things should be found.
So this is one version of hierarchy, but some people like to keep the hierarchical pyramids. In this model is three or four levels of leaders in the organization, and in this model, somebody would start to work as a middleman. This person just looks at the order from the Email and then resends that thing to henchmen. That kind of person ever does anything and they just resend the emails. And this is the thing, what we must remember when we are thinking hierarchy.
What is the person's position in hierarchy?
Another person would carry responsibility, and that actor would just say, that other people have given orders. They couldn't do anything in the cases, where chemicals are delivered to nature. There is always somebody else, who has responsibility with that kind of thing, and the email has been sent, that there corrosion in the tube. But that kind of person is always against reforms. Their benefit is that the traditional way to make things is continuing in their environment.
At last, I must say something about hierarchy in social life. When somebody wants to replace the working democratic system with hierarchy, you should ask, what is that person's position in this system? Here we must remember, that all life is not spent on the work. We have also free time, where we are facing another kind of thing.
Sometimes people are thinking that democracy is always the best thing because the vote cannot be sold or buy. But when we are thinking about sports clubs, what is acting as trusts, we must ask, "how many times the chairman of those trusts have been selected, because that person can get a sale from the gynḿansiums". Think about this, when you are reading this kind of thing.
In everywhere inside our society is some kind of hierarchy, this is the thing, what we must confess. Every team has a leader, whose mission is to make a different kind of particles like people, who have different backgrounds working together. And the leader has a responsibility, that the team does the work, as well it can. If somebody has problems with that, this means discussion. Hierarchy means that the leader, or person who is acting as a leader has power and authority to the workers, and that thing is always one of the most difficult things in the world.
The position of the leader is to be the representer of the supreme leaders of the company, and if there is something wrong in the team, that thing causes divorcement. So leaders are giving orders and henchmen are following those orders. This is the way, as it works. But then we must remember, that if the team leader would not give orders, the fault for unsuccessful action is the leader. And that's why the team leader must not think to be a member of the team. The position of the leader is being outside of the team, and the role is like a coach in some ice-hockey match. And if the thing goes wrong the person, who is responsible for those things should be found.
So this is one version of hierarchy, but some people like to keep the hierarchical pyramids. In this model is three or four levels of leaders in the organization, and in this model, somebody would start to work as a middleman. This person just looks at the order from the Email and then resends that thing to henchmen. That kind of person ever does anything and they just resend the emails. And this is the thing, what we must remember when we are thinking hierarchy.
What is the person's position in hierarchy?
Another person would carry responsibility, and that actor would just say, that other people have given orders. They couldn't do anything in the cases, where chemicals are delivered to nature. There is always somebody else, who has responsibility with that kind of thing, and the email has been sent, that there corrosion in the tube. But that kind of person is always against reforms. Their benefit is that the traditional way to make things is continuing in their environment.
At last, I must say something about hierarchy in social life. When somebody wants to replace the working democratic system with hierarchy, you should ask, what is that person's position in this system? Here we must remember, that all life is not spent on the work. We have also free time, where we are facing another kind of thing.
Sometimes people are thinking that democracy is always the best thing because the vote cannot be sold or buy. But when we are thinking about sports clubs, what is acting as trusts, we must ask, "how many times the chairman of those trusts have been selected, because that person can get a sale from the gynḿansiums". Think about this, when you are reading this kind of thing.
Comments
Post a Comment