Skip to main content

Short writing about lasers

Short writing about lasers

What would you do with a laser, what is thinner than a single hair, but has the power of two megawatts? The new thing in lasers is nanotechnology. The laser ray forms in the tube, what is filled with medium, and the light, what comes from sides will make that ray in that tube, what is called as the laser element.

When we are thinking about the use of nanotubes, we could create an extremely small diameter transparent tube, which is filled with a medium like carbon monoxide, and both sides of this thing would put the laser-mirrors, one is fully mirror, and in other mirror is the small hole for creation of the laser ray. That would make possible to make kilometers long lasers, which would have the same diameter as hair.

Those systems must just surround by light sources, and they would make possible to create powerful energy ray to a very small point. Of course, that element can be made by using the red glass, which makes it the rubidium laser. Those ultrathin elements would put in the reel, and when the laser is needed the laser element, what is surrounded by the smallest possible LED lights, and then the system would create extreme powerful ray, what would be targeted to the very small area.

When we are thinking about carbon monoxide lasers and HO (Hydrogen Oxygen) or simpler saying water lasers, those systems would give their burst in two wavelengths. If we would make simple diamond glass, which means the crystal form of carbon or artificial diamond the laser would give only one wavelength of the light.

That thing could increase the power of the laser, and the thing is that normally laser needs the medium, where the light would scatter to both ends of the laser tube. That thing puts the laser light jump between mirrors, and when more light would be brought to the laser ray, it's energy would rise. But what if we would not use medium, and we would simply light the mirrors by using askew lights?

Would it increase the power of the system? Let's say that it would cause the formation of a very powerful light if we would make the light ray jump from mirror to another through a vacuum. In this case, the light would be targeted straight to mirrors, and then it would increase it's power the same way as it travels in the medium. The power of the laser ray would turn very high because the laser element would not be heated the same way,  how the tube, what is filled with medium would be heathen.

The temperature is the problem with the lasers. And if the element would overheating it would break laser. But if the light travels in a vacuum, there is no resistant and the temperature would turn lower than with normal lasers. Another version is to make the laser extremely long, where the big size would help to cool the lasers, and also the flowing water, what will flow around laser would keep the temperature low. In aircraft, the flowing air would handle the cooling. of the laser.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When robots are laughing and crying.

When robots are laughing and crying.  Does the AI have feelings?  Does the AI have feelings? Or can it be emphatic? The fact is this program code that controls the AI determines if it can give empathic reactions. The problem with the human nervous system is that we don't make a difference in the writing of empathic letters or telling empathic stories human or AI. Our nervous system is not adapted to AI yet. And that's why we cannot separate text written by AI from text that made by humans.  What does somebody make with AI that can emulate feelings? The fact is that the cyborgs are useful tools for infiltration operations. The human-size robots can have WLAN/6G connections with the central computers. Or they can form a neural network that shares information between all group members. The robots can also act as walking neural network-based supercomputers. That can make complicated solutions.  In those networks, each member shares information and their data-handling capacity all o

Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization

    Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization The Earth 2.0 or officially Kepler-452b is locating extreme log distance from Earth(1).    A new Earth-type planet has been found near the star, which is similar to our own Sun. The journey to that planet would take 1400 years, even if the spacecraft will reach the speed of the light. The planet has been found in the year 2008, but the confirmation of the existence of that planet has been taken time, but in 2015 the confirmation has been got, and Earth 2.0 has turned true.  The mass of that planet is 1,9 times Earth and the temperature is excellent if we are thinking about liquid water, but the journey to that planet will take so long, that we cannot ever go in there by using regular rockets and technology. The thing is that this kind of planets are the most interesting if we are looking for the lifeforms, which are similar to us, and the problem with that kind of things is that the communicatio

Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission

  Image I Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission 1) Tunguska UFO-theory  Tunguska meteorite is the mystery, that has been solved once, but then the case has been open again because Lake Cheko was not suitable for an impact crater. That lake has been introducing as an impact crater of the Tunguska meteorite. But the problem is that the shape of that lake is like a swimming pool. And that means it cannot form by a meteorite. So the mystery remains.  Meteorites can launch the natural nuclear fission if they hit the uranium ore, and transfer the impact energy to that ore. And is the thing that the famous "Tunguska" meteorite caused that kind of effect? There is also a theory that some "UFO" explode in that area, but the thing is that it is only theory, but interesting topics for some TV-series.  So I will begin this text by handling that theory, which is one of the incredible and outstanding theories in the world. Officially there is no physical evidence of