Skip to main content

Miniaturized TR3B "Astra" and the use of advanced biotechnology in space systems.

Miniaturized TR3B "Astra" and the use of advanced biotechnology in space systems.

Image I


A couple of interesting pictures that are connected with this text are portraying the mysterious "Black Triangle-UFO" and the diatom, and this is a really interesting thing, that those forms are looking like similar. So what this might mean? Is this only coincidence, that some diatom and the triangle-shaped aerial vehicle have the same form?

That might be a coincidence, but if we want to write a little bit longer text, we might take another point of view for that thing. And that thing is connected with the words that "UFOs are not living and they are not dead". So what that thing might mean? Does that thing some connections with the diatoms, what are living almost everywhere?

Sometimes this kind of structure is planned to use in the extremely small-size RPVs, where inside it is the chamber, where is created the overpressure by using the small-sized pump, and then the ventilation of the jet pipes would control the flow of the air. The energy to that system would get from the high-energy radio-transmitters. So this system would operate like full-sized TR-3B "Astra" but it is far smaller. But what kind of things could diatoms do, if they would be genetically engineered, and the silicone would be replaced by titanium atoms.

Image II


When we are thinking about the thing, what is called "advanced organic technology or advanced biotechnology, there could be possible to make the structures of even the spacecraft by using the genetically engineered diatoms. That means that this kind of genetically controlled particle can have similar structures with diatoms, which have two layers of cells. The outer layer is silicone, and the inner layer is the normal cells.

In theory, the same kind of structure can contain cells, where the outer layer would be titanium or pure carbon or rather saying carbon fullerene. That means that the artificial cells can be covered by fullerene, what is produced in the small factories, and the artificial diatoms can in theory form the spacecraft. But if we are thinking sharply, that kind of system would need extremely advanced nano- and biological technology.

But this kind of thing is fascinating, because if we would have the ability to create diatoms, what has the group of atoms, what we want at the outer layer, we could even grow the spaceships in the flowerbed. And that kind of system would allow creating structures, which can fix themselves. But for making that thing successful, the creation of the DNA of those diatoms must be very sharply controlled. But maybe by using nanorobots and artificial intelligence, we might create this kind of system, what are half organic half non-organic.

Image I

https://www.micropia.nl/en/discover/microbiology/diatom/

Image II

https://media.moddb.com/images/groups/1/5/4418/tr3b_astra3.jpg

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When robots are laughing and crying.

When robots are laughing and crying.  Does the AI have feelings?  Does the AI have feelings? Or can it be emphatic? The fact is this program code that controls the AI determines if it can give empathic reactions. The problem with the human nervous system is that we don't make a difference in the writing of empathic letters or telling empathic stories human or AI. Our nervous system is not adapted to AI yet. And that's why we cannot separate text written by AI from text that made by humans.  What does somebody make with AI that can emulate feelings? The fact is that the cyborgs are useful tools for infiltration operations. The human-size robots can have WLAN/6G connections with the central computers. Or they can form a neural network that shares information between all group members. The robots can also act as walking neural network-based supercomputers. That can make complicated solutions.  In those networks, each member shares information and their data-handling capacity all o

Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization

    Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization The Earth 2.0 or officially Kepler-452b is locating extreme log distance from Earth(1).    A new Earth-type planet has been found near the star, which is similar to our own Sun. The journey to that planet would take 1400 years, even if the spacecraft will reach the speed of the light. The planet has been found in the year 2008, but the confirmation of the existence of that planet has been taken time, but in 2015 the confirmation has been got, and Earth 2.0 has turned true.  The mass of that planet is 1,9 times Earth and the temperature is excellent if we are thinking about liquid water, but the journey to that planet will take so long, that we cannot ever go in there by using regular rockets and technology. The thing is that this kind of planets are the most interesting if we are looking for the lifeforms, which are similar to us, and the problem with that kind of things is that the communicatio

Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission

  Image I Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission 1) Tunguska UFO-theory  Tunguska meteorite is the mystery, that has been solved once, but then the case has been open again because Lake Cheko was not suitable for an impact crater. That lake has been introducing as an impact crater of the Tunguska meteorite. But the problem is that the shape of that lake is like a swimming pool. And that means it cannot form by a meteorite. So the mystery remains.  Meteorites can launch the natural nuclear fission if they hit the uranium ore, and transfer the impact energy to that ore. And is the thing that the famous "Tunguska" meteorite caused that kind of effect? There is also a theory that some "UFO" explode in that area, but the thing is that it is only theory, but interesting topics for some TV-series.  So I will begin this text by handling that theory, which is one of the incredible and outstanding theories in the world. Officially there is no physical evidence of