Is this image of Andromeda galaxy or Epsilon Eridani?

Is this image of Andromeda galaxy or Epsilon Eridani?

There is claiming that the galaxy, what is above this text is too yellow being the Andromada Galaxy. So is it the image of the Epsilon Eridani, what it mistakenly named as the Andromeda galaxy? There is a possibility, that there is happened some kind of mistake, when people have given names for the objects, what are seen in the images. That thing would not a very big mistake, and maybe this image is Andromeda Galaxy.

One interesting detail of this image of the galaxy is that we don't know is this image portraying the Andromeda galaxy or is it the star, what is surrounding by the dust and ice. That means that the image of the young star might look like a galaxy. Those things are really interesting, and there is a possibility, that even the people, who are working for the government make mistakes.

Epsilon Eridani is a young star, what is surrounding by dust and ice, which means that the measurement of the brightness of that star is difficult. This means that Epsilon Eridani might be a little bit brighter than we have thought.

And the thing is that there is a possibility, that the young star would travel inside the cosmic molecule nebula, which means that the star can be younger than it's planets. This is one thing, that has been forgotten to mention when we are talking about the stars and their brightness. Epsilon Eridani was another object, where were send the "Ozma message", but astronomers have thought that the star is too young for advanced civilizations.

When we are thinking about the images, what has been taken from the universe, we are facing one very interesting detail, and that is what we have is that we have given names for the objects by giving the value, how well they are visible in Europe. And that means that things like Magellan's cloud are not very well known outside the society of the Astronomers.

Comments

When robots are laughing and crying.

When robots are laughing and crying. Does the AI have feelings? Does the AI have feelings? Or can it be emphatic? The fact is this program code that controls the AI determines if it can give empathic reactions. The problem with the human nervous system is that we don't make a difference in the writing of empathic letters or telling empathic stories human or AI. Our nervous system is not adapted to AI yet. And that's why we cannot separate text written by AI from text that made by humans. What does somebody make with AI that can emulate feelings? The fact is that the cyborgs are useful tools for infiltration operations. The human-size robots can have WLAN/6G connections with the central computers. Or they can form a neural network that shares information between all group members. The robots can also act as walking neural network-based supercomputers. That can make complicated solutions. In those networks, each member shares information and their data-handling capacity all o

Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization

Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization The Earth 2.0 or officially Kepler-452b is locating extreme log distance from Earth(1). A new Earth-type planet has been found near the star, which is similar to our own Sun. The journey to that planet would take 1400 years, even if the spacecraft will reach the speed of the light. The planet has been found in the year 2008, but the confirmation of the existence of that planet has been taken time, but in 2015 the confirmation has been got, and Earth 2.0 has turned true. The mass of that planet is 1,9 times Earth and the temperature is excellent if we are thinking about liquid water, but the journey to that planet will take so long, that we cannot ever go in there by using regular rockets and technology. The thing is that this kind of planets are the most interesting if we are looking for the lifeforms, which are similar to us, and the problem with that kind of things is that the communicatio

Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission

Image I Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission 1) Tunguska UFO-theory Tunguska meteorite is the mystery, that has been solved once, but then the case has been open again because Lake Cheko was not suitable for an impact crater. That lake has been introducing as an impact crater of the Tunguska meteorite. But the problem is that the shape of that lake is like a swimming pool. And that means it cannot form by a meteorite. So the mystery remains. Meteorites can launch the natural nuclear fission if they hit the uranium ore, and transfer the impact energy to that ore. And is the thing that the famous "Tunguska" meteorite caused that kind of effect? There is also a theory that some "UFO" explode in that area, but the thing is that it is only theory, but interesting topics for some TV-series. So I will begin this text by handling that theory, which is one of the incredible and outstanding theories in the world. Officially there is no physical evidence of

The networked Internet connects the world under one umbrella.

Search This Blog