Skip to main content

Why dark energy and dark material are interesting?

Why dark energy and dark material are interesting?

Are dark energy and dark material the same thing?

The dark energy is one of the mysterious things in the Universe. And sometimes the creation of dark energy is explained that the spin of quarks is causing the thing, what is known as dark energy. The free quarks would be the dark material in this very interesting theory, which could explain part of the dark energy and dark material.

Sometimes we are thinking that the dark energy and dark material are the same things, and this means that we should call those things "Dark stuff" or ether. But we don't know are those things the same thing, and that's why we must say that those things are dark matter and dark energy, and they are one of the most interesting and fascinating things, what are seen in the Universe.

Is dark material free quark, what spin forms dark energy?

There are two theories about the form of dark material and dark energy, another is that thing is forming by the particles, what is something like free quarks or some other thing, and second theory is that thing is free to wave kind of movement in the thing, what we are calling Universe. And that means that the dark energy is like some kind of radio waves, but that thing is too quiet to notice by using radiotelescopes.

So could the dark energy be only the very low energic radiowaves? And then if we are thinking that the dark energy is so-called free wave movement in the Universe, the next question is, what is causing that wave movement, or what moves in that wave movement. And the thing, why the form of the dark energy and dark material is interesting is that is it possible that there is a small particle in the Universe, what is in the border between energy and material?

Could there be some kind of particle that works as a "gate" between energy and material?

And if we could find that thing, we must realize, that this hypothetical particle could be the thing, which helps us to turn the energy to the material. That kind of thing is a fascinating thing, and we know that there is theoretically possible to turn the energy into the material because we can turn the material to energy. But how we can do that thing? That is the thing, what is the problem with the mirror-effect, what could revolutionize everything. The thing is that we haven't made any single of these kinds of successful tests.

If the dark energy would be some kind of very low energic radio waves, that thing means that the dark energy would not affect the small particles at all. That means that even the largest stars would not affect by the dark energy, because of their energy production would cover that effect. But the extremely large entireties like the intergalactic molecule clouds the dark energy would affect. Those molecule clouds are extremely thin, and those forms are extremely stable.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When robots are laughing and crying.

When robots are laughing and crying.  Does the AI have feelings?  Does the AI have feelings? Or can it be emphatic? The fact is this program code that controls the AI determines if it can give empathic reactions. The problem with the human nervous system is that we don't make a difference in the writing of empathic letters or telling empathic stories human or AI. Our nervous system is not adapted to AI yet. And that's why we cannot separate text written by AI from text that made by humans.  What does somebody make with AI that can emulate feelings? The fact is that the cyborgs are useful tools for infiltration operations. The human-size robots can have WLAN/6G connections with the central computers. Or they can form a neural network that shares information between all group members. The robots can also act as walking neural network-based supercomputers. That can make complicated solutions.  In those networks, each member shares information and their data-handling capacity all o

Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization

    Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization The Earth 2.0 or officially Kepler-452b is locating extreme log distance from Earth(1).    A new Earth-type planet has been found near the star, which is similar to our own Sun. The journey to that planet would take 1400 years, even if the spacecraft will reach the speed of the light. The planet has been found in the year 2008, but the confirmation of the existence of that planet has been taken time, but in 2015 the confirmation has been got, and Earth 2.0 has turned true.  The mass of that planet is 1,9 times Earth and the temperature is excellent if we are thinking about liquid water, but the journey to that planet will take so long, that we cannot ever go in there by using regular rockets and technology. The thing is that this kind of planets are the most interesting if we are looking for the lifeforms, which are similar to us, and the problem with that kind of things is that the communicatio

Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission

  Image I Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission 1) Tunguska UFO-theory  Tunguska meteorite is the mystery, that has been solved once, but then the case has been open again because Lake Cheko was not suitable for an impact crater. That lake has been introducing as an impact crater of the Tunguska meteorite. But the problem is that the shape of that lake is like a swimming pool. And that means it cannot form by a meteorite. So the mystery remains.  Meteorites can launch the natural nuclear fission if they hit the uranium ore, and transfer the impact energy to that ore. And is the thing that the famous "Tunguska" meteorite caused that kind of effect? There is also a theory that some "UFO" explode in that area, but the thing is that it is only theory, but interesting topics for some TV-series.  So I will begin this text by handling that theory, which is one of the incredible and outstanding theories in the world. Officially there is no physical evidence of