Skip to main content

This is what people don't want you to know about ultra-fast aircraft




This is what people don't want you to know about ultra-fast aircraft

When we are thinking about the aircraft like MiG-25 (1) and MiG-31(2), which are the extreme fast interceptors, we might think that those aircraft are somehow harmless. The thing is that the ultimate fast speed would allow them to fly to the outer atmosphere, and they are capable to destroy the low-orbiting satellites. But there are also rumors, that in some of those aircraft robot versions would be installed the nuclear bombs, and they would be used as the cruise missiles, what can return to the base if they are no need to use. 

And sometimes we might wonder, why they are mentioned in the list of the gunships?

Many people believe that effective attack aircraft would need a sophisticated weapon system for being dangerous, but this is not true if we would want to sweep away the entire enemy army. So have you ever heard the term "sonic boom"? The term means the conical pressure wall, which is forming if the aircraft is moving faster than sound. This means that when the aircraft would cross the sound barrier the air would not have time to go away from the front of the plane. That causes effect, where the air molecules are pushed away from the surface of the aircraft with the speed, which increases Mach 1. 

The thing is that the pressure wall would travel faster than the speed of sound, and that turns the air to the wall, which is called "shock wave". This term is taken from the explosives. The pressure impact of explosives causes the pressure wall, which travels in the air by the burning speed of the explosive. A nuclear weapon creates a pressure effect by increasing the temperature very fast at the point, where the explosion happens, and the expanding gas is the thing, that is called a shock wave. 

The thing is that if the aircraft, what travels by speed Mach 3, would fly very low, the pressure wall would be hard as steel, and that thing would cause terrible damages in the area, where that thing affects. But what if we would install loudspeakers to the nose of MIG-31 or MiG-25, which are the Mach 3 interceptors? That thing would cause the movement of the air molecules would get the speed of aircraft behind them, and this means that the pressure wall would travel 4000 kilometers per hour to the target. This is the reason, why the aircraft cannon is effective. 

 If the speed of the ammunition of the cannon in a stable position is 1000 kilometers per hour, would the aircraft cannon, what uses the same ammunition would be installed in the aircraft, what is flying 1500 km/h, the speed of ammunition will be 2500 km/h. This makes the aircraft cannons more effective than the similar cannons, which is installed on a stable platform. And if the aircraft is flying speed of Mach 3 it can make the ballistic jump, which makes it capable to destroy low orbiting satellites. 

(1)

(2)

Image:

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When robots are laughing and crying.

When robots are laughing and crying.  Does the AI have feelings?  Does the AI have feelings? Or can it be emphatic? The fact is this program code that controls the AI determines if it can give empathic reactions. The problem with the human nervous system is that we don't make a difference in the writing of empathic letters or telling empathic stories human or AI. Our nervous system is not adapted to AI yet. And that's why we cannot separate text written by AI from text that made by humans.  What does somebody make with AI that can emulate feelings? The fact is that the cyborgs are useful tools for infiltration operations. The human-size robots can have WLAN/6G connections with the central computers. Or they can form a neural network that shares information between all group members. The robots can also act as walking neural network-based supercomputers. That can make complicated solutions.  In those networks, each member shares information and their data-handling capacity all o

Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization

    Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization The Earth 2.0 or officially Kepler-452b is locating extreme log distance from Earth(1).    A new Earth-type planet has been found near the star, which is similar to our own Sun. The journey to that planet would take 1400 years, even if the spacecraft will reach the speed of the light. The planet has been found in the year 2008, but the confirmation of the existence of that planet has been taken time, but in 2015 the confirmation has been got, and Earth 2.0 has turned true.  The mass of that planet is 1,9 times Earth and the temperature is excellent if we are thinking about liquid water, but the journey to that planet will take so long, that we cannot ever go in there by using regular rockets and technology. The thing is that this kind of planets are the most interesting if we are looking for the lifeforms, which are similar to us, and the problem with that kind of things is that the communicatio

Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission

  Image I Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission 1) Tunguska UFO-theory  Tunguska meteorite is the mystery, that has been solved once, but then the case has been open again because Lake Cheko was not suitable for an impact crater. That lake has been introducing as an impact crater of the Tunguska meteorite. But the problem is that the shape of that lake is like a swimming pool. And that means it cannot form by a meteorite. So the mystery remains.  Meteorites can launch the natural nuclear fission if they hit the uranium ore, and transfer the impact energy to that ore. And is the thing that the famous "Tunguska" meteorite caused that kind of effect? There is also a theory that some "UFO" explode in that area, but the thing is that it is only theory, but interesting topics for some TV-series.  So I will begin this text by handling that theory, which is one of the incredible and outstanding theories in the world. Officially there is no physical evidence of