Skip to main content

Architecture and whirls




Architecture and whirls

Fractals are useful tools when the whirls that are forming in the rivers and flowing water are calculating. The thing is that the fractals are repeating form, what is repeating after time to time is opening the new way for engineering. When we are thinking that the computer must create a model, what kind of whirls the propellers of the ship are creating it can use the fractal for that kind of calculation.

Also, fractals are useful tools, when architects are calculating the form of the houses, and another thing, what is important in this kind of calculations is the position of the buildings. If we want to make the city, what is comfortable we are facing things, that in the summer, the wind should blow, but in winter the same thing is very rough and freezing. The wind would decrease the temperature, and that means that the city of tomorrow would have some kind of system, which decreases temperature also on the streets.

If we would allow air flowing through the walls by installing vertical tubes in the walls of the houses, that will decrease the temperature on the streets. In this case, the air would be pulled through the street layer. This will decrease the temperature during summer, and also stabilize the difference of temperature between the layers, and that will obtain the wind.

One very interesting version of this idea is to put the ventilation tubes in the walls of the houses. The capillary effect would pull the air through the building and at the same time, the hot air would be sucked away if the ventilation hatches are at the street layer. The thing is that the air would be more comfortable if the heat would conduct away in the hot weather.

The problematic thing is not winding. The whirling wind causes problems. And another version that causes problems is the choppy wind. That type of wind is forming because the wind would be dammed behind some layer and after pulling to the wall while that air would erupting as the choppy, what can whirl, and at the first the wind would be more powerful, than it would otherwise be. In theory, this kind of whirling wind can have the same force as the tornado. But there are no reports of the forming the tornado in the city area.

If the rising air pylon would be limited, the wind would be controlled. In the summertime, the wind would make the air more comfortable, but it raises the dust, which causes problems. The thing that causes the wind is the warm air, which pulls the air through it. So if we would put the tubes in the walls of the houses, and then pull the air through them, that would decrease temperature.

That would limit the difference of temperature layers because of the difference in temperatures causes the rise of air pylon. And another thing that causes problems is the whirling gas, which is rising the dust and garbage from the ground. So if the whirls can be limited the air would be cleaner.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When robots are laughing and crying.

When robots are laughing and crying.  Does the AI have feelings?  Does the AI have feelings? Or can it be emphatic? The fact is this program code that controls the AI determines if it can give empathic reactions. The problem with the human nervous system is that we don't make a difference in the writing of empathic letters or telling empathic stories human or AI. Our nervous system is not adapted to AI yet. And that's why we cannot separate text written by AI from text that made by humans.  What does somebody make with AI that can emulate feelings? The fact is that the cyborgs are useful tools for infiltration operations. The human-size robots can have WLAN/6G connections with the central computers. Or they can form a neural network that shares information between all group members. The robots can also act as walking neural network-based supercomputers. That can make complicated solutions.  In those networks, each member shares information and their data-handling capacity all o

Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization

    Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization The Earth 2.0 or officially Kepler-452b is locating extreme log distance from Earth(1).    A new Earth-type planet has been found near the star, which is similar to our own Sun. The journey to that planet would take 1400 years, even if the spacecraft will reach the speed of the light. The planet has been found in the year 2008, but the confirmation of the existence of that planet has been taken time, but in 2015 the confirmation has been got, and Earth 2.0 has turned true.  The mass of that planet is 1,9 times Earth and the temperature is excellent if we are thinking about liquid water, but the journey to that planet will take so long, that we cannot ever go in there by using regular rockets and technology. The thing is that this kind of planets are the most interesting if we are looking for the lifeforms, which are similar to us, and the problem with that kind of things is that the communicatio

Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission

  Image I Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission 1) Tunguska UFO-theory  Tunguska meteorite is the mystery, that has been solved once, but then the case has been open again because Lake Cheko was not suitable for an impact crater. That lake has been introducing as an impact crater of the Tunguska meteorite. But the problem is that the shape of that lake is like a swimming pool. And that means it cannot form by a meteorite. So the mystery remains.  Meteorites can launch the natural nuclear fission if they hit the uranium ore, and transfer the impact energy to that ore. And is the thing that the famous "Tunguska" meteorite caused that kind of effect? There is also a theory that some "UFO" explode in that area, but the thing is that it is only theory, but interesting topics for some TV-series.  So I will begin this text by handling that theory, which is one of the incredible and outstanding theories in the world. Officially there is no physical evidence of