About the crisis of cosmology
The article of this text could also be "are we looking at the ball too close? That means that if we would see a ball-shaped universe too close, it seems like a straight layer. So is universe the giant bubble with many other bubbles, what has formed in the big bangs? Or is universe the single straight layer, what is endless. When we are thinking about the giant megastructures, we might think that universes are balls, what is on the straight layer. In multiverse theory single universe would be the ball, but what is outside the universe? Is there the straight layer, where is multiple universes in endless form? Or what is in the space outside the universe?
The universe seems closed, which means that there is a limit to that thing. And then we should think, what means the closed universe? That means that the Universe would be like a ball, and the galaxies would be on that layer. But then we might see that structure sharp, which means that the question is, what is outside of this ball. Is there the other universe, and how far would that another universe be?
Then we are thinking that the universe is like a bubble, what would expand faster than it should, we are facing things, that there is too much energy in that structure. Something inside the bubble pushes the bubble by using a bigger force than we have calculated. Or there is something outside the universe, what will pull it to it, and would that other thing be another universe?
Or it could be the group of galaxies or molecules, what is the size of the universe. But then we must think of the idea that the universe would be the layer. That thing would seem very easy because there would be stars and galaxies forever, and then somebody asks, what means forever at this time? When we are facing the cosmological paradoxes, we always want to try to put them in the simple model. There are many theories, that seem simple at first sight, but then they would become more complicated.
And one of those things in the form of the universe. That means, that if we are thinking about Big Bang theory, the shape of the ball seems more natural than straight 2D-layer, and this thing has made cosmologists claim that the size of the universe is so big, that when we are observing it, we would see the layer. And the argument for that is that we are looking at that thing too close. Same way as the Earth seems to be a straight layer, the universe would act the same way when we are looking at it.
But then we should describe the "universe". Is it area, where the material exists in the form, what we know. And that kind of thing is a really interesting way to think. The problem with cosmology is that when theory goes to the conflict into observation, some people want to transform the observation to fit the theory. That kind of thing is really interesting when we are thinking about cosmology as science, and the new equipment would bring new data for scientists, who must sometimes adjust their formulas.
https://tekniikanmaailma.fi/uusi-tutkimus-synnytti-kosmologisen-kriisin-maailmankaikkeus-saattaa-sittenkin-olla-kaareva-ja-aarellinen/
The article of this text could also be "are we looking at the ball too close? That means that if we would see a ball-shaped universe too close, it seems like a straight layer. So is universe the giant bubble with many other bubbles, what has formed in the big bangs? Or is universe the single straight layer, what is endless. When we are thinking about the giant megastructures, we might think that universes are balls, what is on the straight layer. In multiverse theory single universe would be the ball, but what is outside the universe? Is there the straight layer, where is multiple universes in endless form? Or what is in the space outside the universe?
The universe seems closed, which means that there is a limit to that thing. And then we should think, what means the closed universe? That means that the Universe would be like a ball, and the galaxies would be on that layer. But then we might see that structure sharp, which means that the question is, what is outside of this ball. Is there the other universe, and how far would that another universe be?
Then we are thinking that the universe is like a bubble, what would expand faster than it should, we are facing things, that there is too much energy in that structure. Something inside the bubble pushes the bubble by using a bigger force than we have calculated. Or there is something outside the universe, what will pull it to it, and would that other thing be another universe?
Or it could be the group of galaxies or molecules, what is the size of the universe. But then we must think of the idea that the universe would be the layer. That thing would seem very easy because there would be stars and galaxies forever, and then somebody asks, what means forever at this time? When we are facing the cosmological paradoxes, we always want to try to put them in the simple model. There are many theories, that seem simple at first sight, but then they would become more complicated.
And one of those things in the form of the universe. That means, that if we are thinking about Big Bang theory, the shape of the ball seems more natural than straight 2D-layer, and this thing has made cosmologists claim that the size of the universe is so big, that when we are observing it, we would see the layer. And the argument for that is that we are looking at that thing too close. Same way as the Earth seems to be a straight layer, the universe would act the same way when we are looking at it.
But then we should describe the "universe". Is it area, where the material exists in the form, what we know. And that kind of thing is a really interesting way to think. The problem with cosmology is that when theory goes to the conflict into observation, some people want to transform the observation to fit the theory. That kind of thing is really interesting when we are thinking about cosmology as science, and the new equipment would bring new data for scientists, who must sometimes adjust their formulas.
https://tekniikanmaailma.fi/uusi-tutkimus-synnytti-kosmologisen-kriisin-maailmankaikkeus-saattaa-sittenkin-olla-kaareva-ja-aarellinen/
Comments
Post a Comment