Palamedes and Anthonie Palamedez

Palamedes and Anthonie Palamedez

Unknown geniuses

I know that Palamedes Palamedesz (1606-1638) (1) is not a very usual name. But the thing is that this man was the genius as a painter. He was the brother of another well-known Dutch painter, and those men painted very high-class paintings. And the thing is that I sometimes wonder, why everybody knows about the name Vincent Van Gogh, but the name of Palamedez brothers is not so well-known. Palamedes died at the age of 32, and that means that he might be somehow handicapped. 

There is a strange detail in this painting, which is painted by the English born Dutch artist, whose name is quite difficult to write, but the name you will find from the annex one, and the thing that makes that person so interesting is his strange name. Exactly the thing, what makes this artist very interesting is that he was a brother of another well-known Dutch painter Anthonie Palamedez(1601-1978) (2), and you might guess how difficult it is to separate those people from together. 

They were both golden age dutch painters, and they are made fascinating paintings. And the question is, why the other of brothers have this kind of extraordinary name? The thing in this painting that portraits the cavalry fight is that there seems to be a strange character, what is painted like a cloud. That character seems like some kind of muscleman, who would rub the knucklebones together. 

Strange "muscleman" in clouds

This painting is really interesting because it is so well done. But the artist Palamedes Palamedesz is a very interesting person, he has painted many paintings, and the thing, what makes those paintings interesting is that he has painted some cavalry fight scenes, and in those scenes is something very interesting. Behind the men is a cloud character, which seems a little bit extraordinary. 

And sometimes I have thought that those paintings are meant to portrait something else, but then the artist has been covered that thing by using the cloud formation. And the question is, what was the thing, what suppose in the place of that character? Maybe there was something, that was politically incorrect, and the painter would remove things, that that person planned to make during the painting process. And the thing is that there are many secrets, what is hidden in paintings, and many mysteries are waiting for the finder. This kind of thing makes the work of the researcher interesting and fascinating. 

(1)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palamedes_Palamedesz

(2)

https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthonie_Palamedesz.

Image:

http://www.jeanmoust.com/categories/battle-scenes-and-military-subjects/palamedesz-palamedes/cavalry-battle-scene-657519

The empty hole in the clouds and the frozen bird in the painting

The empty hole in the clouds and the frozen bird in the painting

When the researcher of art makes the job, the primary purpose of that person is to get in the ming or thoughts, what the artist would think, while making that work. This thing might seem really easy, but there are many things, which makes the practical solution quite difficult. When we are thinking about some extraordinary artists, we might realize that the images are not forming automatically.

That means that the artists must give time, willing and knowledgeable to the job, and the thing is that the extraordinary and interesting paintings are very highly qualified in the point of view of the technical quality of painting, and in those images, the artists have put their skills and time for the work. But then we must realize that every painting is symbolic. The symbols are launching the reaction in the brains, that the image is forming on the canvas or paper.

And the major idea of painting is the result depends only on the skills and will of the artist. This is the thing, what makes creative work really difficult. The thing is that if the artist would not want to make the job, there would not be the results on the paper or canvas or anywhere else if that person would not want to make the work.

Is the bird symbolizing the imagination in the painting "La Grande Famille", what is painted by René Magritte in the year 1963?

There is a very interesting detail of the painting of the bird. René Magritte gave that painting the name "La Grande Famille" ("The Great Family"), but I cannot see a family in this painting. Of course, the bird is frozen in time, but why Magritte gave that name to the image? He could name it by "The great bird" or "The Bird at the time". So where he saw the family? Is the bird the symbol about the thing, what is always present, but we can ever touch it? We all can know that the bird is exist, but nobody is allowing to own the bird. So could this painting symbolize the imagination and abstract way to think about things?

The thing is that every artist have interesting works, and also my new favorite René Magritte has many interesting products. And one of them is a series of paintings, where the man or some living object seems to have another space or reality inside them. The bird is like something, what is scratched or moved from another reality, and transfer to the reality, what was observed by Magritte. The result in this painting seems like some STEALTH-aircraft, what visual stealth-system would be jam, and it shows the image, what is not making thing invisible.

But as you see, Magritte did not make the images just from images, what comes from inside the conscious of his mind. Maybe he created the image by using the cloud formations, what are in another image as the model. That kind of formations or forms, where seems to have aircraft-looking hole in the middle of the clouds are really interesting. But are they only the coincidence? This kind of questions might interested Magritte, and we must remember that the UFO-sightings of Belgium happened years after the painting of this portrait. So why Magritte paint that painting?

Was he mean something, what that man didn't want to tell other people? But as we know what kind of things made sure that the USA has got super-secret aircraft, what is unable to detect by using radar. But the STEALTH attack aircraft  F-117, what is officially the first STEALTH aircraft in the history of USA flew officially ten years after the painting of Magritte. So was he see something, what officials didn't want to tell people? And was this the program of the F-117, or something more interesting? Or is this image only the coincidence or product of imagination?

The strange detail in one painting, which might inspire the creators of nanotechnology

The strange detail in one painting, which might inspire the creators of nanotechnology

I have introduced this painting somewhere else, and as you see it is similar to other "Totentanz" images, and maybe it is painted for the warning, that everybody can be the informant. And the time, when this image has been made was The 30 Years War. When the war was going on, both sides used informants for delivering the information to other side movements. This war was a religious war between the Christian world. And it was a really bloody campaign. And the first time the ordinary people faced the violence of the war.

But there is one detail, what has caused the inspiration for some science fiction writers like Isaac Asimov.  The detail is the nun, who stands at the front of the window, and talks with another skeleton.  

Asimov created the idea for one of his books by using the idea that the entire planet would be covered by the intelligent cells. The Asimov's idea was that the dominating species of the planet was the swarm of the bugs, what would not be intelligent alone. But when the swarm is acting together it will able to get any form, what it wants. Maybe he got the inspiration of that kind of things from this kind of things.

The idea of nanotechnology is the same as the Asimov's species of intelligent bugs. The thing is that the nanotechnology can create big structures and the form of the nanomachines is similar to living cells. They can look like some thready bacteria, and those small size wires would be the hooks, what is keeping the machines or structure in one piece.

Each of those machines would be controlled by the microchip, that knows it's placed in the structure. Microchips are communicating together by using WLAN, which makes possible to separate and reform the structure.

That figure of nun seems to rise from the ground and dust. When we are thinking about the nanotechnology and extremely small machines, those things can make the form of a human. If the system is created by using the machines, which are made by using silicone. The result is something, what seems like a human.  Or everything else, what the system would want that creature to portray.

René Magritte "Philosophers lamp" and "El Hombre Dorado"

René Magritte "Philosophers lamp" and "El Hombre Dorado"

(Picture I

The lightweight respirator would save lives in today

I have written about this recently, but repetition is the mother of all studies.  When we are looking at the painting "Philosophers lamp", which is painted by René Magritte, we might see many things, and one is the small respirator. That respirator would act that way, that the respirator would recycle the exhalation gas through the pipe, or chamber, what is equipped with an active carbon filter.

That filter would remove the carbon dioxide from the breath. This kind of small-size systems would allow the scuba diver to dive freely and longer, than use the normal respirator or at least those small-size machines can make scuba diving safer because if the bottles would go empty. That pocket-sized small respirator allows keeping the diver life until that person would go to the surface. Or this kind of respirators would be used by the firemen or any other persons like painters, who needs lightweight systems in their work.

"El hombre dorado"

When we are thinking the case that the person is covered by using the gold leaf, that would isolate that person's body from the outer space. And if the person could breathe by using the small respirator, that thing allows in theory that person can be in space outside the spacecraft, because the gold leaf is good insulators against the radioactive radiation.

In the modern version, the entire skin must be covered by using latex-type material, and every single millimeter must be insulated from the vacuum. That kind of lightweight space suit might be used in emergency situations and the idea is to make the space suit, what would be like scuba diving suit.

Or in some visions, this suit would spray on the skin of astronaut, if there would be a problem in spacecraft, and those astronauts would be in the sleep bags. The system might cover the skin by using special latex and gold, which isolates the body from the vacuum, and then the respirator would take in use when the spacecraft will be evacuated.

Picture I https://stpetecatalyst.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/Magritte-The-Philosophers-Lamp.jpg

Short writing about the painting "An Alchemist in His laboratory"

Short writing about the painting "An Alchemist in His laboratory"

(Artuk.org)

Short writing about the painting "An Alchemist in His laboratory"


Alchemist worked in front of other people 

There are many paintings, which has this name, and some of those paintings are made by unknown artists, and the reason for that might be that those painters were afraid of revenge because some alchemists were wanted for witchcraft. If the painter hired the location of the witch that could cause that the painter would get the death penalty for hiring that information.

Also, alchemists didn't want that people would know that they were alchemists, and the painter wanted to hide the identity of the model and himself. Because if the alchemist has told about the experiments to the painter, that would be told to keep his own identity secret. One of the most interesting detail in this painting is, that alchemist reads the book.

Was real alchemist only written the instructions to "human robot", who made those experiments by following the texts?

In that book might be the instructions for the experiments what this man makes and in this case the person, who makes the tests or practical research might be the "human robot", who would make practical work, and the identity of the real mastermind was covered that way. If the instructions for tests would be clear enough, even the regular person would make the practical things and the real person, who made ideas and instructions for the test might stand as a hidden identity. And if the instructions would be written to that book even child can read them to the maker of the test.

I used this image as the illustration image in the writing about Alchemy, and now I will write something about this painting. There is one very interesting detail, or actually, there are many details, what we should think, and one of them is that alchemist is working in the front of the eyes of the normal people and he also allows children play in the next to him. And that means that this man seems to have nothing to hide, and then we can think, do those people even understand things, what alchemist makes?

Do they see the ultimate genius or some person, who might be some bookkeeper or something like that? The reason why alchemist allows those people to see him at work is that if there would be some police or soldiers, who are asking about the work of that man, would somebody tell it to him. And the way, how those people would say that thing is "hey sheriffs are looking for you, and what are you done"? So the alchemist would not tell his name to those people. But there are many things, which are really interesting details in that image.

Alchemists must hide their work from other people

There are many things, what made people really suspicious of alchemists, who were claimed to made contract with the devil. Those persons tested medical operations, which would be prohibited even in modern times, and that's why they must hide their notes in the codes.  Because if they were uncovered that Alchemist would send to jail or even hang because of the experiments.

One of those codes might be the globe, where is the line. That could be the instructions of the separation surgery of the cerebral hemispheres, what is made for a cure for epilepsy, and maybe some of those men made those surgeries. When we are talking about surgery, we must remember that the successful operation is different than operation, and maybe many people died in those tests.

They were claimed to made contract with devil himself 

The idea was that if the corpus callosum would cut in the early ages, there would grow the person who has two fully advanced humans in one body. The thing is that if the corpus callosum would cut the brains would have problems with synchronizing their operations, and that means that there would be problems with social skills and concentration because cerebral hemispheres cannot communicate together with the normal way.

I don't know has anyone made those surgical operations in the time, when this painting has been painted and they are strictly prohibited except for the cure of epilepsy.  The metal dome over the skull tells that the Alchemist has skills to control the mind of people, and that person might use the things like suggestion and hallucinate and stunning vegetables and mushrooms for controlling the person.

Thoughts about the painting "The Last Supper" by Leonardo da Vinci (1495-1498)

https://kimmoswritings.blogspot.com/

Did Leonardo da Vinci rename that painting after his death?

Did Leonardo da Vinci paint that masterpiece with claiming that he was painting some ordinary painting for the decoration? And then changed that name in his testament? Is the person, who sits in the middle actually meant to portray Jesus? Or witch one of those characters is Jesus because there are two persons, who seem similar?

Are those same looking persons in the middle of the table actually Leonardo's way to remember, that there could be the twin brother of Jesus? The thing is that Leonardo painted that painting, and that means that we cannot ask about this master, what he might think during the creation process? Because this we can only use our imagination to create ideas, what might move in the mind of that master.

Is there the hidden hint of the twin brother of the Jesus? The mysterious "Lucifer-character"? 

Is there a hidden thing or theory about the twin brother of Jesus? The mythic "Lucifer". There is claiming that this character walked also in the middle of the people, but he chose the way of violence for the resistance against Romans. This means that the "Lucifer" was the man, who caused the death of Jesus. This character has been claimed to be the Antichrist, and the thing is that if that person would be worked like the Antichrist, that would cause terrible problems for Jesus.

This theory has supported the persons, who seem something interesting about the case, where Jesus went to the temple for giving the lesson. There he said that there is no need to pay, and then the Pharisees asked money. So was the price of the temple actually paid, but somebody else has used that space. And could that other person be the twin brother of Jesus?  That Is the key element in the twinkles what have been made about this painting, and the second question is that did Leonardo renamed it after his death by using the testament to deliver that message, and did he made that thing to other paintings?

There are many ways, how we might see this painting, and one thing is that the disciples would not seem to notice Jesus Christ, who sits in the middle of them. They are just talking together, and one of those inmates seems to show Jesus, who sits in the middle of those lines. That person seems to blame Jesus or the female character on another side of him, but the thing is that is it possible that the character in the middle of the team is actually portrayed St. Peter. And one of the characters seems to have sunglasses

Those people were sitting in the line behind the table, and if Jesus wants to wash their feet, that would mean that he must rise from the table. The thing is that those people seem to yell and argue together, and that means that there would not able to hear a thing in that room.  This will bring one strange idea in my mind.

Did Leonardo try to hint, that there could be the wrong man, who was arrested, and Jesus was able to flee? 

I now that this feels some kind of ridiculous. But it is possible that Leonardo thought that Jesus could flee, and that made him fear the Inquisition and death?  If that is the thing, what Leonardo thought, and he has discussed that thing with some other people, that thing could cause death. And sometimes I have thought that is it possible, that Leonardo painted that painting with another name, and after his death, that painting was renamed. So did Leonardo mentioned the name, what he wanted to give the paintings his testament? And during life, that man could claim that he painted ordinary paintings.

So the theory about this painting is that Leonardo thought that there is a possibility, that the Pharisees were arrested the wrong man during the Eastern evening. And there is a thing, which is very well known for the people, who are known for his personal history. Leonardo played ideas, and in fact, this artist might be thought that kind of things, while he made the paintings, what is marvelous and brought many thoughts in the mind of other people.

One of the most interesting things is the woman, who sits in the middle of those disciples. The thing that there is a woman in the middle of the group of the men is a little bit extraordinary, and maybe Leonardo painted that character to confess, that the people behind that table were not Jesus and his team. If we would think about this situation in the point of view of psychology, that woman would cause a schism between those men, and that would cause that the volume would be very high in that room.

Who those people really were?

There are some other twinkles about that female character, and one of them is that character is Mary Magdalene, but the thing is that Leonardo couldn't see that situation. And the thing is that how he created that image. Was there some kind of documents, what told how those people were sitting during the last supper.

They are all without shoes, and that thing would cause strange ideas in my mind. One of those ideas is that behind that table is sitting only the disciples and the point of view is the thing, how real Jesus has been seen that thing. And maybe Leonardo went a little bit too far in some other painting, and he afraid the inquisition, so he painted only the disciples.

The question in this painting is that the thing, what Leonardo da Vinci claimed that was portrayed, and what it really portrayed could be very far away from each another. Maybe Leonardo portrayed some ordinary group of people, and then there was something, what that painter should not see, and that's why he covered the thing as the religious painting.

Twinkles of the painting "The way of the silence" (1900-1903) By František Kupka

https://kimmoswritings.blogspot.com/

Twinkles of the painting "The way of the silence" (1900-1903) By František Kupka

1. There are many myths about ancient Egypt

In the beginning, there are many myths, what is connected to the Egyptian pyramids, and one is that the unrest of Egypt have been made because somebody wants to deny the scientists research those pyramids. The strange thing of those structures is that the Muslims didn't destroy them, and that thing is grown the legend of the pyramids.

But as you see this is not mentioned as the scientific text. It's meant for the thinking about the painting "The way of silence" Sometimes somebody asked the painter, what his paintings portrayed. And sometimes the story tells that the artist, whose name I will tell you in the next chapter answered, "what do you see in those paintings?". The question was asked after the artist has been transformed into abstraction. But in fact, we all have a different way to see things and that's why every painting might have even thousands of twinkles.

2. Theosophical connection

Theosophical society has been given an inspiration the painting, "The way of silence" what has been painted František Kupka, and there have been many ways to the twinkle of that painting. The one way is that inspiration to this painting has been given Helena Blavatsky, the woman, who wrote the book "Isis Unveiled".

In this twinkle, Kupka has taken the idea that the statues or crystals in the statue have been or will be stored the weak energies from the stars. That energy is very weak, and only when the people are alone in the night, they can feel that cosmic energy, what is coming from the stars, and what is stored in those stones in billions of years.

3. Kupka wanted to portray some kind of threat 

When we are thinking about this twinkle, we might notice that Kupka was really interested in science. And maybe the road between the sphinxes is made for warning. If those sphinxes would store some kind of electric vortex, that thing would influence to the brain core, but as you see, this writing is made for only the analyze of the mind of Kupka, or the things, what that man might think during the painting process.

If we are thinking this painting in the pure thing, what is coming from the mind of Kupka, and if we would connect that inspiration to the tests, what were made by using electricity, we must realize that maybe Kupka wanted to portray some ancient energy or threat in that painting. The idea might be that when the lonely walker would walk between those statues, would there be a pair of statues, where the level of the electricity is a very high, and then the electric arc would turn the person to ash.

4. The transformation process in the painting

Sometimes I have been thought that maybe Kupka captured the process in this painting. When the person would start to walk between those sphinxes, the electromagnetic vortex would transform that inmates way to think. And that means that while walking on this road, that person would not come out as the same person, who went to that road, which is guarded by sphinxes. The question what the walker might think is, why those sphinxes are in there, and if we would want to connect this twinkle to the real life, that traveler would ask "why those statues have not been destroyed?".

The person is walking deeper and deeper to that road, and there would seem no danger. The only way to stop the road is to turn back, but in the silent night would be the danger, what the observer cannot even imagine, while he walks in the warm night on the road, what was mentioned only for kings and rulers. And at the last, I must say that maybe Kupka thought that in ancient Egypt were more than one Sphinx, which is located in the front of the Great Pyramid.

One very important thing about symbolism

(Charles IV: Wikipedia)

One very important thing about symbolism

When somebody says, that the person has painted the painting like icon in let's say about 200 years, that doesn't mean this person has lived 200 years. That means that at the beginning of this process was one painting or drawing, what came in the mind of that person, who has started the process. And after that, the successors of that person have continued the developing of those images or paintings and they are brought the new thing in those paintings, what is like some chain letters from the past.

The thing in those paintings is that they are like the bloodlines, which would become brighter and brighter, and in the painting would forming new details, and some elder details would be removed or renew by new things. And this makes that kind of paintings interesting. Some scholars have introduced the idea, that by following those bloodlines or developing lines, would there be possible to find the paintings, where were the portrayed the real face of the persons like Jesus Christ or some other holy man, and this thing would make the work with religious art very fascinating. The picture above the text is the painting of King Charles IV and the biography of that man you can read from the link below.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_IV,_Holy_Roman_Emperor

The thing in the hunting of the eldest religious paintings is difficult because of the religious conflicts in Europe in the 17th century and wars between Christians and Muslims couple of hundred years earlier as well as conflicts between Eastern and Western church at the end of the era of the Roman empire have caused the situation, that some of the eldest religious paintings have been destroyed. And this is the thing, what makes those icons and religious paintings interesting.

The thing is that, at the beginning of the developing process, would some monk or other person see something in the dream, what that person paints. Then the other will continue to draw next versions of that drawing, but because the makers of those paintings are humans, and they use their imagination.  This makes impossible to calculate the pixels back from those paintings, and the scholars must follow the bloodline to the beginning to see the original icon or painting, what can be totally different than the image, what is seen on the wall.

The Totentanz paintings (St. Mary's Church, Berlin late 15th century)

The Totentanz paintings (St. Mary's Church, Berlin late 15th century)

St. Mary's painting 

From the Medieval time and Early Renaissance is left series of paintings, what are named as "Totentanz" or "The dance of the Death", and the thing in those paintings is remarkable that in those paintings people seem to dance folk dances with the skeleton, or some other strange creatures. The thing is that the persons seem not even know or notice that those creatures are somehow creepy when they are dancing with them.

The creatures that are dancing with the people, who seem to have a good position in society and good clothes have simple clothes, which would not cover even their strategic places. The thing might be made for the warning, that in every team can have a traitor in the line, but there are many more translations and readings about this kind of graphics. On top of the text is another very interesting version of this type of paintings.

That painting is located in the St. Mary's church in Berlin, and it is painted in the late 15th century.  In that painting is so-called humanoid looking creatures, and here I mean the creatures, what have a so-called soft silhouette. Their nose and faces are looking like very primitive, or they are not fully developed, and there are strange things in this painting. The thing is that those creatures, what are dancing with people seem to like more advanced than the skeletons, what have painted in the other this kind of paintings, where the creatures are only the skeletons.

Here I'm writing about humanoid-shaped creatures and I mean that there is something strange in those creatures. Their clothes are primitive and actually, they would not have more than canvas what to wear. And the thing that human creatures have good clothes is very interesting because the paintings what are painted for churches must follow the orders of the Catholic church and the Holy Bible. The creatures, what painter portrayed in those paintings should follow the letter of the Holy Bible precisely, and if that thing was broken the painter would burn in the pyre.

This was the rule in the world before the 30 Years' War. Even in the ordinary life, the painter should be careful, that the painting was not broke the rule of the church, because if that thing was noticed involving the blasphemy, would that cause the death penalty by the Inquisition.  And the thing that this kind of paintings would see in churches might be quite a radical thing in today. This makes them interesting. Why they are painted? And who ordered them?

Frantisek Kupka: Music 1937 (Is this diagram for a nuclear weapon?)

Frantisek Kupka: Music 1937

Here is another painting from Frantisek Kupka, and I know that there is missing the heart or whatever the mark of the Czech "S" is called, but never mind. Let's start to think about the painting "Music" of that man, and this painting seems very interesting because there might be hiding the way to launch nuclear weapons. In 1937 Czechoslovakia was treated by Nazis, and this state was occupied in 1938, so the Czech scientists might make the plans for the nuclear detonator, and cover it as the painting.

We must remember that the key persons of the hydrogen bomb project what was called as "Super", Edward Teller and Stanislaw "Stan" Ulam were from the Eastern Block. Teller was Hungarian and Ulam was Polish and maybe those physics work, what they made before they mover to the USA covered as the artwork. There must be something to show before physics accepted in the "Manhattan" project. There are two ways to make that process, and another one is to drive the bites of uranium or plutonium together, and another one is the thing, what is used in the thermonuclear weapons like Castle Bravo.

The thing in that in the middle of lithium would put the stick of uranium or plutonium, and the little low yield nuclear bomb would launch in the side of the main explosive. The electromagnetic radiation would cause the stick in the middle of lithium would start to fissile, which causes the nuclear detonation in the radioactive stick. That will cause the fusion in the lithium layer, and release enormous energy level. There is also planned to use high-power electromagnetic radiation for enriching natural uranium.

That electromagnetic radiation would cause that the U-235 atoms are starting to fissile, and the neutrons what are released would cause that the U-238 will transform to Pu-239 or weapon plutonium. This way to make the enriching process is extremely dangerous because the stick on natural uranium will explode very easily. There is also made test to detonate nuclear weapons by targeting the laser rays to natural uranium.

And the energy is caused that the fission would start in the nuclear material, which causes a nuclear detonation. This type of nuclear weapons is called "sub-critical". It means that the nuclear material would not have the mass, what is needed for fission, and the loss of the critical mass must replace by pumping external energy for the bite of fissile material.

The type of electromagnetic radiation is not very important, and there is claiming that in the middle of the fission chamber have been installed the bite of pitchblende and in that point is targeted the radio waves.  The problem with this kind of detonator is that the rise of the power of radiation must be very fast that the implosion would happen straight at the right point and time. So here I have thought that maybe Kupka has hidden the principle of the nuclear detonator in this painting.

What if Mona Lisa is the self-portrait of Leonardo Da Vinci?

https://fi.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mona_Lisa

There are tales, that the most incredible painting in history, is actually the self-portrait of Leonardo Da Vinci and this makes things very interesting. Why this painting is done, and why Leonardo painted it a very long time? The long painting period would tell, that there was first the painting, what portrayed something, and then the color layers would be removed from that character, and there were made some replacements for the painting, and that thing, what is removed is very interesting.

The thing is that there must be something, what somebody wants to remove from the public eye because of the movement of the colors have been made very sharply, and the repainting has been very sharp work. That denies the uncover the picture by grinding the colors very carefully.

There would be one very comfortable reason for that the painting is made, and that thing is that painting was used to track the family members of that mysterious painter. The thing is that the painter used the mirror for making the handwriting for the paintings and drawings is very interesting because mirror writing is not actually the cryptography or something, where would be needed the cryptological skills to open those texts.

And here I must say, that I have started to think, that the writings, what have been made by using the mirror and are in the opposite way than normal scripts are made for somebody else, who was sitting in the quite far away from the artist and followed the work, what the master is doing. The mirror helped the observer to see the things, what artist made. Maybe there are some codes in the drawings or paintings like some lines must put on the certain point of the maps, and they will tell the route to somewhere.

But let's go back to Mona Lisa, and there is a possibility, that there would be self-portrait at the first, and then somebody else, who was so great painter as Da Vinci himself transformed picture to look like a woman. There is a possibility that in the place of the black shirt have been something else, but then the paint has been completely removed and replaced with the hair and skirt. If the paint were not removed completely, there would be possible to grind the color cover away, and then uncover the things, what is painted below the paint.

One very interesting painting from the past: "The Apocalypse by Hieronymus Bosch"

Picture I

Here is one very famous painting from history, and it is the Apocalypse portrait by Hieronymus Bosch, who was born Jheronimus Van Aken, have been painted this very rare and otherwise interesting painting, and there are many readings about this painting, what is very terrible. Some people see the humanoid base in that painting. And some other persons claim, that in this painting is predicted the Holocaust.

When we are thinking about those characters, we might think that the makers of the movie "Terminator" have been got inspiration in their film from this painting, and the "skeleton figures" have sometimes read as the robots, and the place, what this thing portrait is sometimes claimed to be some kind of alien base. There is also interesting figures, which seems like some mixture of the lizard and dragonfly. Maybe somebody planned to shoot trained dogs to the castle area, and if those dogs would be trained to smell the gunpowder, and then there would be a candle on the holder, what is combined to their head by using rope, those animals could destroy the entire castle.

The thing is that the figures, what are claimed to portrait ski poles or if the person uses the imagination, those figures could also be read as the parabolic antennas or some other communication equipment, but we know that this is only one way to read this little bit disturbing portrait. Somebody has been claimed that this kind of paintings is disturbing, but here we must say, that this particular painting is not actually so disturbing or awful, what some other medieval and early renaissance paintings are.

There are also many other readings, and one is that in this painting Hieronymus Bosch is predicting the Holocaust. Some people have claimed that the box, where is the Heraldic cross, and the people are going in there forcing by those mysterious skeleton figures is the Nazi gas chamber. And then we must see, that there are many mysteries about this strange artist whoever signed his works.

The question is, that "why his paintings are so different than other artists works"? What made this interesting person begin to paint this kind of things? If those paintings would find in his home, there would be arresting and the fate of this man was that he would be sent to the asylum or justified because of witchcraft and executed. So why he began to make those incredible, and at the same time somehow very disturbing paintings, what is full of the interesting characters like half-humans and machines, and here we can see the thing, that the line between genius and madman is not very sharp.

The paintings, what this man made are full of symbols, and I always think, what would happen, if the people would found those paintings in his home? Maybe they would think that he was somehow "different", but there might be something connected with the creativity and the way to think. When we are thinking about the productive work, what this man has been made, there is something, what caused that he began to paint machines and other kinds of things.

Picture I https://ih0.redbubble.net/image.241271604.6516/pp,550x550.u4.jpg