Loitering munitions or kamikaze drones are effective weapons that cause high risk if they get into the wrong hands.

The invasion of Ukraine is typical Russian military action. Long-range cruise missiles are used against civilian and military targets. The thing in the use of the cruise missiles is that the Glonass/GPS systems are effective only if the location of the target is well-known. And another thing is that the system should know all the time if the target is moving. In the western military. 

The problem with the Russian missiles is this: are they accurate enough to make pinpoint accurate attacks? So are they shot at civilian targets on purpose? And how well do their systems stand against high-power ECM (Electronic Counter Measure) jamming? 

The attacks are followed by high-flying recon planes or satellites. The problem is that if the target is moving. The missile should know that thing or it misses the hit. New missiles are so-called kamikaze drones. They are cruising above the battlefield. The official name of those systems is loitering drones. They can use against things like cruise missile batteries. 

Those drones are like Aquila target/recon drones that are equipped with anti-tank or some other type of warhead. The Aquila was the system of the 70s. And there are more advanced systems that are replacing it. But basically, they are all similar systems. 

Those kamikaze drones are transmitting data to the command center. And when the target is visible the controller will give an order to dive against that target which can be a ship or main battle tank. They are normal recon drones that are equipped with a warhead. 

The difference between a kamikaze drone and a cruise missile is minimal. The famous "Tomahawk" cruise missile is the only BQM-119 drone that is equipped with a conventional or nuclear warhead. But "kamikaze drones" can patrol above operational areas and transmit data and then make the attack against the target. 

The kamikaze drones that are using radio control are vulnerable to jamming. The EMP strikes can also drop those things. When we are talking about pinpoint accuracy there are two or three types of internal navigation systems. The GPS is needed to locate the beginning point of the flight of the missile. Then the inertial navigation will take the missile to a certain point of the flight route. 

The other way is to use TERCOM (Terrair contour matching)-system. The TERCOM means, that the system uses a series of images that are stored in the memory of the computers to fly to the target. In that system, satellite or high-flying recon plane will make the 3D topography map by using radar or lidar. And then the missile will use that data to find the route to its target. 

And finally, the image recognition system or ATR (Automatic Target Recognition) will select the target by using scene-matching technology. That system has the image of the target stored in its memory. And when the image that the camera transmits matches with the image that the missile will aim to target. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automatic_target_recognition

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_MQM-105_Aquila

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loitering_munition

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TERCOM

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tomahawk_(missile)

A short tale about pseudoscience

A short tale about pseudoscience

What if there is no right answer?

One very good example of the question, where is not answer is the tale about scientists and boys. In this tale, the boy shows the brown and white horse on the plant, and then that boy asked the scientist "what is the name of that thing?". The scientist answered that "I don't know" and then the boy said, "it's a brown and white horse".  Here we must understand that the question was about the name of that thing. And how a scientist should know that name? The right form of the question would be "what is that thing?". And then the scientist would answer "horse", and then the real answer would be "brown and white horse".

Or if the scientist would answer that way, the boy could say "brown and white horse, what name is XXX", and then the answer would be longer and longer. The thing is that this tale is one of the best examples of things, where we cannot even give the right answer. This is one of the versions, where the form of the answer would also change all the time, and we cannot ask the hose, what its name is.  And who knows, how other horses are calling that horse, and could we even say its name? The name what the owners of that horse use of it, or the name what other horses call that horse?

There are two types of pseudoscience, harmless and harmful.

A harmless version of pseudosciences are things like horoscopes or some other things. Most of us don't believe them, and that thing makes them look quite harmless. Of course, some horoscope could be coded messages to intelligence or some other things, but there is quite a small possibility, that this kind of thing concerns the normal people.

Also, things like the mass of the photon or some case near the black holes, where the black holes extreme gravity field would cause the situation, that the speed of light could be crossed have no mean to people. We must say that for proving that thing, we must fly to the black hole, and meter our speed beyond the singularity. That is the thing, that gives answers to us, and before that everything, what we say about that thing is pure theory.

But the harmful pseudoscience is things like playing with medicals and homeopathy. This kind of thing can cause even death. And also things like carelessness while testing medicals and other kinds of things are serious things.

We should not justify everything, what we see in the world of quantum physics as pseudoscience. But the thing is that some pseudoscience makers are good speakers, and they can make even the very dangerous things looking good. They use good-looking arguments for supporting their way to see things, and sometimes they are an appeal to religious opinions. When the motivated followers are standing in the next of those people, there are only a few persons, who can resist those quite charismatic people, and that will boost their way to say things.

Image:

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/d/dd/RWS_Tarot_20_Judgement.jpg/220px-RWS_Tarot_20_Judgement.jpg

Modern digital business environment

Modern digital business environment

Networks and revolution of technology are not a new thing, but the thing is that those things are now happening in the many times during the generation. ICT and digitalization are becoming a more and more important part in the business and governmental actions, and today we can be connected to the people more effectively than we ever thought before.

The lightweight, mobile systems allow people to be connected on the Internet all the times, and that makes new kind of threats and opportunities for business and another kind of things. The key role in digital business is similar to normal or traditional business is in the networks.

And the value of networks is that those things are giving information for the people very fast. And when we are thinking about the case, that we would want to give an offer to some company, the most important thing is to let those people read our offer. The things, that the people who are buying services and select subcontractors would have contact with the offer maker because large and well-known companies get offers all the time. So why the person, who selects the subcontractors or contractors would read our offer?

This is the most difficult thing. When we are thinking the digital business and management of that kind of things, we must remember, that if we want to create trust with those actors we must give something, what might interest those actors. So the biggest difference between traditional and digital business is the speed, how the data would travel between companies. And when we are sending emails, we must remember, that those people, who are getting those emails would get probably hundreds of emails every day.

The thing is that we must realize that information security has a strong role in that kind of marketing and other business. We must secure our working environment and our network against hostile operators. In the network of business and private life, the rumors and false information is delivering very fast. And that's the thing, why we must be careful while working in the high-speed and hectic network. And the thing is that we must choose data, what we want to share. Fact is that we should tell people something about ourselves and our role in working.

But we must not uncover things, what might risk the security of the company or other people. The thing that somebody doesn't have a social media account is suspicious. That means that we must uncover something, and remember that relationships in private life would be a good gate to the inner circle of ourselves or somebody else.

If some person would get access to the wrong mailbox, that thing would cause the catastrophe in the relationship between the offerer and receiver. Or what would you think, if the first offer, what you get from some actor is some kind of joke? In the modern world, the thing is that we would not use one kind of software anymore for communication.

Social media applications might be used together, and even the person would not tell if they have a social media relationship with some person, who would send the offer of services. This is the thing, why we must be careful in this kind of things. If we would screw up in our private life, those things can be used against us. The thing is that people are not always telling their actual position of themselves. And that kind of things is dangerous because if we use strong criticism of some things, we might face that the target of our criticism is sitting at the front of us.

And the people, who are analyzing attitudes and data, what somebody shares might have multiple backgrounds, what means those teams are connecting their training. Those things are extremely important when services are offered to children.

The thing what makes a person suspicious is that that person accepts only similar people, what that person is to mate in social media. That tells that there is something wrong if the person would accept only the owners of the motorbike to the social network. Those people who make analyzes have psychological and another kind of training.  Their mission is to find out dangerous people from the network.

What if we would face alien?

What if we would face alien?

1. In some scenarios "Alien" is the hostile creature, and those things should ever underestimate

Have you seen the movie series alien? The one thing in that movie, what is introducing the fictional alien, but those creatures can be used as a tool, what is used to handle this kind of things. In that film series, the "Alien" might seem somehow primitive, but if we would face those things in real life, we should not underestimate that thing.

In fact, we could face the creature, what can change it form as it wants. The thing is that those creatures, what we see might be controlled by some other lifeforms, or that lifeform could have advanced biotechnology, what supports its operations in the hostile planets.

2. Ever underestimate your enemies

And when we are thinking the form of that alien, we must realize, that in real life, those things might be totally different than we are. That means that the thing, what this alien would transfer to the stomach of the victim, could be the thing, what would cover the organism, what acts like some kind of parasitoid wasp.

This means that the terror, what the alien would bring in the place would cover the real purpose of that extremely powerful species. And I certainly hope that those species are only the product of the imagination.

The films have been given ideas of some of the most extreme military protective gears, whatever invented. This very lethal and illegal suit mission is to deny the ability to shoot military personnel, and the development of it has been ended, when nerve gas storage have been destroyed.

3. Those films have given ideas of the most extreme protecting suit, what is ever created

When we are thinking about the things, what we are seeing those movies, we can think that this "alien" would give the idea for the innovation, where the protective suit of the personnel is equipped with the layer, where is acid or some poisonous gas. The thing is that if the person carries the automatized nerve-gas detector, what is connected to the atropine injector.

If the combat vests would damage, the nerve-agent what is stored in the vest is launched. And then the atropine injector, what is only the modified version of the insulin dosing machine. The thing, what differences this system from the dosing machine, is that it is connected to the nerve-gas detector. This kind of systems would allow using chemical agents without the military personnel even know about it.

The ice is a dangerous material

The ice is a dangerous material


In the "Operation Mongoose" CIA investigated bullets, what would vanish in the body of the victim, what hides the identity of the gun. During Kennedy's assassination was rumors, what was the product of imagination about the melting bullet, what was vanished in the body. But was those bullets used against Kennedy or some other target is without evidence.

Those rumors are only rumors, and there is no evidence about the use of this kind of weapon in that case. In the laboratories of the special forces have been created the bullets, what are made by using the same material, what is used in the suppository, and what contains terrible poisons like ricin or some other chemical agent.

The purpose of the special material of the bullet is that the ammunition would melt in the body of the victim. There was no evidence of the use of this kind of bullet in Kennedy's case, but it has given ideas for some other melting materials, which can be used as the weapons.

There have been introduced the very interesting idea, that the assassins could use ice bullet, or otherwise to say, bullet what is made by ice, in their missions. If the bullet is melting, the riffling image of the bullet would vanish, and that makes tracking the gun almost impossible.

That thing means that when the bullet is melting the identity of the weapon would be vanished. The bullet itself would be the ice bite, what is made by the water, and cooled very cold temperature. Then it will put in the thermos bottle, what can put on the nose of the gun, like a silencer.

The purpose of the thermos bottle would be to keep the bullet cold, and if this weapon is needed to use in the assassination missions, there could not change for another shoot. In that thermos can be two hatches, what will open, when the shooter pulls the trigger, and the pressure would pull the bullet out and if the pressure would be high enough the ice bullet would be devastating.

I don't know how this thing would work with standard weapons, but black powder guns this thing could be a suitable tool for special mission agents or operators like that. In fact, things like ice sticks can be used as a temporary weapon like knives, what are single user, and there are stories that somebody has killed another person in the prison by using ice plate, what edge is very very cutting.  in every year somebody would be injured, when the edge of the ice is cutting the hand, and at the same way those plated can be used also as the weapons.