The headline posters are telling what is the problem of society

The headline posters are telling what is the problem of society

The newspapers are an excellent tool when we want to make analyze the feelings of society. The headline posters are telling, what are the attitudes and problems with people, and they uncover the problems, what are felt as very important. But the question is, who thinks that those topics are really important is different, what normal people believe.

The persons who are choosing those headlines and articles are representing somebody. And that means that the selection maker thinks, that there are some problems with that. The idea of newspaper articles is to highlight things, what needs the fixing, and otherwise, they are meant for supporting some idea or ideology, and that makes those articles very well source when we are looking at the important things.

When newspapers are full of mental disorders and other kinds of things, and the idea is that the director's mental condition can turn down, there must be some kind of reason for that. Those things like mental condition are of course dear to some people, who are thinking about changing the ownership of the company.

And if the director or main owner can send to the mental hospital, that kind of things would be very easy. If the court system would give judgment, that the person is unable to handle things like own money, that means the inmate would be declared as the incompetent. Then there would be no need to ask opinions of that person. 

That would make discussions very easy because meetings can happen without that person exists in the discussions. This kind of things would make many things easier, and that's why some people like to ask medical help for giving support for their benefit from the medical staff. And psychiatrical problems are a very good stick in that kind of things.

Those problems are things, which are very good to sell in the court system, and the idea is that the mental patient can be dangerous. The movies like "Hannibal" are shown that psychiatrical patients right is different than other patients. And their guardians would not do a thing in this kind of cases. only one joke about Parkinson patient would cause the media reaction, but nobody even cares about the movies like "Hannibal" what also stamp the psychiatric patients.

And when Trump mentioned them as animals, the media cheers about that kind of things. This is interesting because media has judged the Trumps way to rule. But they didn't even say anything against those kinds of comments, and when we are thinking the depressions and suicides, most of the psychiatric patients are not criminals. So why this kind of things is so hard to justify. When we are thinking about books, where the drug addict has offered drugs to friends and caused their death, that kind of things is so-called acceptable.

What might be the reason for the silly claiming?

What might be the reason for the silly claiming?

What might be the reason for the silly claiming?

When somebody pretends that some other person is something, what that inmate is not, the motive can be innocent, like just making other people laugh. But there might be other motives like remove some other inmate from the route to some legacy. There is much psychological research about what kind of scenarios, where the role model would cause harm in the mind of a human being.

And some of those research are pointed truth the thing, that if the child would be grown in the environment, where the fantasies are created by using violent films. If the fantasies are supported that the adults claim that the way of the act in the violent movies is justified and accepted, that thing can cause violent behavior in adult ages.

If violent movies are watched when the child would not have experiences from real life, those things will make the base of the experiences. And that kind of things might support the developing of the violent behavior model in the personality of the children. If adults claim that the child is some kind of prince or something that would thing cause problems in the elder ages.

Some of those things are very harmful to children, who cannot use critics against the authority of the adults, and if adults are claiming something to  That kind of things might be very effective tools in the hands of criminals, who might want the legacy of some billionaire family, and one of the most effective ways to make that thing, is simply make the real heir maniac in the eyes of the law. But the motive can be simple embarrass some person just for fun or getting the spouse of that person, who could get a bad reputation or sending to a mental hospital because of those jokes.

Could the roleplay be the tool for those jokes?

The reason why somebody claims being a time traveler would be very natural, and the simplest thing is just the role-play, where some character is a time traveler. I don't know, how many people actually play role-games, but there might be some versions, where those people are playing some game on the street, and then they are telling a thing, what belongs in their roles to the wrong person. And maybe that might make those people look a little bit different than others.

There could be a reason for that thing, and maybe somebody advised the wrong person to those competitors or players. And that kind of things might cause a laugh, but they are a little bit embarrassing thing if you self would face that kind of joke. Have you ever imagine how many of those role players are facing things, what are meant for a joke, but the result is that the person, who faces that kind of jokes, might be disturbing for that kind of things.

There might be some other kind of joke or misunderstanding in the childhood

When we are thinking about the situation, that some adults or elder persons of the family are claiming that the youngest member of the family is some kind of time traveler, that thing would cause that person believes in that thing. That kind of things might look unbelievable in the eyes of the other people, but if there are some individuals, who are telling that kind of things to the little children, and if those people seem like adults.

That thing might cause the children to really believe in that thing. Also, here might be used some kind of virtual reality glasses for supporting that kind of actions,  what is meant for some sick joke. Or the purpose of that thing might be that the victim of the joke would really be wanted to send to some mental hospital. For the motive of that kind of things might also be an attempt to get the legacy what would otherwise testament to the victim, but because of those mad talking that person would send to mental hospitals.

The problem of the females and children in the field of terrorism

The problem of the females and children in the field of terrorism


Women and children are problematic actors in the field of terrorism because they are collecting sympathies, and many people who are operating in the practical operational level or field operators are feeling bad when they must return those persons back to their homelands. The men are easier for those operators, and this is a problematic thing because the man, who stands with an assault rifle against children doesn't look good in the home.

The human mind built for feeling sympathy for children, and even in the war zone, that kind of actions, where children are dying is justified as the inhumane actions. Also violating women is an absolutely intolerable thing in western culture because our legislation is made for protecting the weaker. The thing is that propaganda and adults are growing children, who are hating western culture.

Or otherwise, the person would grow in the environment, where is learned to hate somebody, who comes from the foreign lands. And of course, we can say, that hate as the "critical attitude". The problem with the modern western world is that we are always facing things, what we cannot handle. The persons in the television or the candidates of the parliament are promising easy solutions. And one of them is the war against terrorism.

The problem in the war is that thing grows people to violence, and that means that the next generation would be more and more radical than the last one. Even if we are acting like robots, the human mind is built for protecting our species. And that means the mentally healthy person automatically feels sympathy for children and women.

The thing in the field operation level is that the persons, who are operating in the area, would face the ethic and moral problems if they are facing the children, even if they are armed. In the field, many things seem a little bit different than in some house of parliament. And the traumas or things, what they have seen and done, what those persons see there are following those men and women the rest of their life.

https://yle.fi/uutiset/3-10721647