Even Einstein was human

Even Einstein was human

The problem with Albert Einstein is that he and his ideas are so fantastic and the same time so massive, that we cannot question them. So when we are thinking about Einstein's theories, what was fundamental in his lifetime, or when he introduced them to the world, we must remember two things. 

Einstein didn't have supercomputers, and when he introduced the Theory of Special Relativity in 1905 and Theory of Common Relativity in 1915, those theories became two of the most awesome and well-known formulas. But we don't know why Einstein created those formulas? Who ordered that man make those theories, and what was hypothesis when that job was given to Einstein? 

So there is another thing, what we are many times forget to ask, and that thing is "what were the values, what Einstein used? Did he use the theoretical speed of light, what is 300 000 m/s or did he used the value, what was metered by Michelson, and what is approximately 299 792 458 m/s? The thing is that there are differences with those numbers. And when we are thinking about the time, what Einstein used for creating those formulas, he made excellent work. But he 'forgot that the space is never straight. 

When we are calculating things by using extremely long decimal numbers, we can say that Einstein's formulas are not matching with reality. That means that those famous formulas are working in the common and enough large scale, but when we are going to the very small areas there are mistakes. So Einstein's theories work with entirety, but unique details are problems. This is the problem with physics and every other formula in the world. 

Those formulas are made in the time, there were no supercomputers and float number algorithms, which can handle extremely long decimal numbers, which gives enough accuracy for calculations. Sometimes people have asked, what if the value for the speed of light, what was reported by Michelson was wrong? In that case, every single laser ranger in the world would show the wrong numbers. 

This would open the route for very interesting philosophical discussions about things, what might be wrong, but commonly thought to be right. And if we would someday meter the different value for the speed of light, what would we do? Would we replace the speed of light and other meterings, where were used the laser meter again? 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ov98y_DCvRY

There are two wormhole theories

Image I

There are two wormhole theories

1. The virtual wormhole bases Einstein's Theory of Relativity, that gravity or very high speed slows the time. That means that the time is a relative thing, what can be stopped by traveling by the speed of light. 

In the first version, the crossing the speed of light is only virtual. The idea is that the black hole would be used as the gravity sling, which would increase the speed of the particle near the speed of the light.

And the slowing the time in the particle would cause the virtual effect when the hypothetical astronaut would see that the travel between stars would feel to take only minutes. The time to start, what is at the 150 light-years away from the Earth would take 150 years.

The "virtual wormhole" bases Einstein's theory about that the time would slow in the gravity field or when the particle moves with very high speed. And in this theory, the energy is slowing time, because gravity is one version of energy, like kinetic or movement energy is?

The wormhole would be the effect when the particle is traveling in the space by the speed of 99,99% of the speed of light. And that causes the effect, that the time goes very slow or time stops inside the particle.

In this theory, the lightspeed would not be crossed, and the travel to the star what is as an example the 150 light-years away from the beginning point of the wormhole would take 150 years, as I wrote before, but inside the particle, the travel would feel to take the only couple of minutes. In this version, the lightspeed would be the cosmic speed limit and the wormhole would be only the virtual effect, what is possible only in the speed, what is near the speed of light.

2. The craft would jump to the fourth dimension

That theory bases the idea that the cosmic speed limit is the level of energy, where the three-dimensional universe can keep the particle inside it. And if the particle would face or cross that speed, the kinetic energy transforms it as the black hole, and the particle drops out of our universe.

We don't know is the travel to the fourth dimension possible, and if the particle would transform into a black hole, there is a possibility that it would explode immediately. That means that the black hole would be filled, and it would be destroyed, because of Hawking's radiation, what escapes from the black hole would cause that the black hole would vanish or be streamed to quark steam. But if it would jump to the fourth dimension, it would open interesting visions.

Why some people are talking about the fifth dimension? And is the fourth dimension only space, what is behind the event horizons of black holes?  Or is it some kind of energy level?

Somewhere is claimed, that the wormhole itself would be the fourth dimension. And the fifth dimension is the space, where the wormhole takes the particle. Some cosmologists are thinking that the fourth dimension is the space inside the event horizon.

And if the wormhole could take particles only to the gravitational center of the network of black holes, the fourth dimension would be the supermassive black hole in the center of Galaxy. So the fifth dimension is in this theory route back from those particles

Or some other theories are claiming, that the "fourth dimension" is the energy level, and when the energy would be pumped away, the particle could return from that space to our universe. And the wormhole, what brings particles back from the fourth dimension is the fifth dimension.

Dropping out of universe means the particle would travel to space, which is known as the "fourth dimension". That thing is an interesting space, because of the particle would be out of our universe. But how we can prove that thing? The problem with that thing is that we don't know, how to return the particle from the fourth or fifth dimension.

Image:

http://chandra.harvard.edu/photo/2014/cena/cena.jpg

Theory of relativity or theory of relative

Theory of relativity or theory of relative

1. Every theory is somehow inaccurate

I know that I made a mistake in the name of Einstein's theory, but that thing is called academic inaccuracy.  When we are thinking about things like accuracy, we would face the thing that all theories are somehow inaccurate, because they are meant for common use. There are many things and places, where theories would not work.

And there is always a difference between the theoretical and real world. In theory, we can model everything in the memory of the computer. But then we are facing the thing, that there is no object, what fits that model. When we are thinking the cases of supermassive black holes, we are facing the cold reality, that those supermassive black holes are maybe not the typical black holes.

2. A typical black hole might not locate in the middle of the galaxies

Modern astronomers think that in the center of every single galaxy is the supermassive black hole. And that would be very interesting because that means that those black holes are easy to find. Galaxies are very visible objects and that means that this makes those black holes easy to find. But actually, we cannot see the black holes themselves. We can see the cosmic structures around them, and then we must think about this case by using some other method or road to find out one very interesting thing about black holes.

The typical black hole is not probably in the middle of the galaxies.  A typical black hole might not galaxy around it, and that makes them quite difficult to find. But those black holes are sending X-rays, and that makes them easy to find if the observer would have X-ray telescopes. The high energy reactions around black holes are uncovering those objects, what looks like stoned.

Theory of relativity and space travel

Theory of relativity and space travel

https://kimmoswritings.blogspot.com/

The fish-example 

Einstein's theory of relativity is one of the most interesting and remarkable theories in history. And there is one connection to the example of the flowing river. That thing is that if the fish would swim against the flowing water with very big power, would it face the flowing water with faster speed than in the places, where water is standing still.

So if the speed of the fish is 20 kilometers per hour and the water would flow against it with the speed of 20 kilometers per hour, the impact speed with water is 40 kilometers in an hour. The example is taken from the examine, where the impact speed of the cars is asked when they are hitting against together while both of them have a speed of 40 kilometers per hour. That means that the impact speed is the addition, where the speeds of both particles are sum together.

Ability to travel faster than the light

When we are thinking about the first paragraph, we might ask, what would that thing do with the space traveling and the interstellar spaceflights. In fact, there is a possibility to create the spacecraft, what would cross the cosmic speed limit, what is called as the speed of the light. In this system would the ions pull towards the spacecraft with very powerful magnets.

Those magnets would create the impact area, where the impact speed of the spacecraft would be higher than the speed of light. And maybe that kind of things could make the hyperdrive possible, and in the future, we could use this version of the hyperdrive in the distant future for traveling between the stars.

In this case, the rockets what use antimatter as fuel would accelerate the spacecraft to the speed, what is about the 50-90% of the speed of the light. And then the system can pull the ions to the accelerator channel, what would accelerate them to the speed of light. If the particle accelerator would suck the particles in the accelerator channel by the speed of the light, or something like 80% of the speed of the light, would the impact speed of the spacecraft and the particles about 1,5 times of the speed of the light.

In that point, the spacecraft would fly faster than the speed of light. The reason for that is that slowing the mass cannot slow by unlimited speed and the thing causes that the spacecraft would travel faster than light in the short moment because the speed of the light is slower in water than in the air. And then when the electron is hitting to the water, would that cause the thing, what is called the "border layer crossing".

This phenomenon is visible in the neutrino detectors, where the electron is hitting in the water pool, and that thing causes the blue light shock-wave. This means that the speed of the electron crosses the speed of the light in a very short time period. And when the electron is slowing, it must release its energy, what is seen as the blue light shock wave.

Could this be the hyperdrive?

The idea is that the particle pulling is turned off, and maybe the spacecraft would jump forward with the speed, what is higher than the speed of the light.  The idea is similar when the fish what would travel upwards to the river in 20 kilometers per hour because it must fight against the flowing water, and then the fish would face the stream pool, and suddenly it's speed would increase to very high.

In this hypothetical case, the starship would pull the particles against it, and the impact speed with those particles would be something like 1,5 times the speed of the light, and then the particle accelerator would shut down. By using this technology, the hypothetical spacecraft would jump forward like rabbit of the fish in the example. So that can be one version of the hyperdrive.