Skip to main content

There are two wormhole theories


Image I

There are two wormhole theories

1. The virtual wormhole bases Einstein's Theory of Relativity, that gravity or very high speed slows the time. That means that the time is a relative thing, what can be stopped by traveling by the speed of light. 

In the first version, the crossing the speed of light is only virtual. The idea is that the black hole would be used as the gravity sling, which would increase the speed of the particle near the speed of the light.

And the slowing the time in the particle would cause the virtual effect when the hypothetical astronaut would see that the travel between stars would feel to take only minutes. The time to start, what is at the 150 light-years away from the Earth would take 150 years.

The "virtual wormhole" bases Einstein's theory about that the time would slow in the gravity field or when the particle moves with very high speed. And in this theory, the energy is slowing time, because gravity is one version of energy, like kinetic or movement energy is?

The wormhole would be the effect when the particle is traveling in the space by the speed of 99,99% of the speed of light. And that causes the effect, that the time goes very slow or time stops inside the particle.

In this theory, the lightspeed would not be crossed, and the travel to the star what is as an example the 150 light-years away from the beginning point of the wormhole would take 150 years, as I wrote before, but inside the particle, the travel would feel to take the only couple of minutes. In this version, the lightspeed would be the cosmic speed limit and the wormhole would be only the virtual effect, what is possible only in the speed, what is near the speed of light.

2. The craft would jump to the fourth dimension

That theory bases the idea that the cosmic speed limit is the level of energy, where the three-dimensional universe can keep the particle inside it. And if the particle would face or cross that speed, the kinetic energy transforms it as the black hole, and the particle drops out of our universe.

We don't know is the travel to the fourth dimension possible, and if the particle would transform into a black hole, there is a possibility that it would explode immediately. That means that the black hole would be filled, and it would be destroyed, because of Hawking's radiation, what escapes from the black hole would cause that the black hole would vanish or be streamed to quark steam. But if it would jump to the fourth dimension, it would open interesting visions.

Why some people are talking about the fifth dimension? And is the fourth dimension only space, what is behind the event horizons of black holes?  Or is it some kind of energy level?

Somewhere is claimed, that the wormhole itself would be the fourth dimension. And the fifth dimension is the space, where the wormhole takes the particle. Some cosmologists are thinking that the fourth dimension is the space inside the event horizon.

And if the wormhole could take particles only to the gravitational center of the network of black holes, the fourth dimension would be the supermassive black hole in the center of Galaxy. So the fifth dimension is in this theory route back from those particles

Or some other theories are claiming, that the "fourth dimension" is the energy level, and when the energy would be pumped away, the particle could return from that space to our universe. And the wormhole, what brings particles back from the fourth dimension is the fifth dimension.

Dropping out of universe means the particle would travel to space, which is known as the "fourth dimension". That thing is an interesting space, because of the particle would be out of our universe. But how we can prove that thing? The problem with that thing is that we don't know, how to return the particle from the fourth or fifth dimension.

Image:

http://chandra.harvard.edu/photo/2014/cena/cena.jpg

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When robots are laughing and crying.

When robots are laughing and crying.  Does the AI have feelings?  Does the AI have feelings? Or can it be emphatic? The fact is this program code that controls the AI determines if it can give empathic reactions. The problem with the human nervous system is that we don't make a difference in the writing of empathic letters or telling empathic stories human or AI. Our nervous system is not adapted to AI yet. And that's why we cannot separate text written by AI from text that made by humans.  What does somebody make with AI that can emulate feelings? The fact is that the cyborgs are useful tools for infiltration operations. The human-size robots can have WLAN/6G connections with the central computers. Or they can form a neural network that shares information between all group members. The robots can also act as walking neural network-based supercomputers. That can make complicated solutions.  In those networks, each member shares information and their data-handling capacity all o

Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization

    Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization The Earth 2.0 or officially Kepler-452b is locating extreme log distance from Earth(1).    A new Earth-type planet has been found near the star, which is similar to our own Sun. The journey to that planet would take 1400 years, even if the spacecraft will reach the speed of the light. The planet has been found in the year 2008, but the confirmation of the existence of that planet has been taken time, but in 2015 the confirmation has been got, and Earth 2.0 has turned true.  The mass of that planet is 1,9 times Earth and the temperature is excellent if we are thinking about liquid water, but the journey to that planet will take so long, that we cannot ever go in there by using regular rockets and technology. The thing is that this kind of planets are the most interesting if we are looking for the lifeforms, which are similar to us, and the problem with that kind of things is that the communicatio

Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission

  Image I Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission 1) Tunguska UFO-theory  Tunguska meteorite is the mystery, that has been solved once, but then the case has been open again because Lake Cheko was not suitable for an impact crater. That lake has been introducing as an impact crater of the Tunguska meteorite. But the problem is that the shape of that lake is like a swimming pool. And that means it cannot form by a meteorite. So the mystery remains.  Meteorites can launch the natural nuclear fission if they hit the uranium ore, and transfer the impact energy to that ore. And is the thing that the famous "Tunguska" meteorite caused that kind of effect? There is also a theory that some "UFO" explode in that area, but the thing is that it is only theory, but interesting topics for some TV-series.  So I will begin this text by handling that theory, which is one of the incredible and outstanding theories in the world. Officially there is no physical evidence of