Skip to main content

The problem with innovation is similar to some festivals



The problem with innovation is similar to some festivals

There are problems with the festivals, that some artist, who will come to perform would need money to continue the career. And the thing in those cases is, that if the festival is a so-called profitable case, the artists should get money about their work, which means that they should set payments, what artist must do when the perform is practicing. And in all cases even in the non-profitable festivals, the costs of the artist should be paid.

This is a very complicated thing because if some artist is just beginning actor without no name and recognizability would those people make their best in those cases? Who is the artist, who has so much name, that the inmate or band can ask big payment? And what happens, if in the front of the so-called big name is not an audience, who are coming to listen to some other artist, who might have performed to some marginal groups.

Bands and other actors what have acting long time has many types of music or art, and they might just choose wrong bites of their product for that evening. And would they perform their newest product at some festivals, what is free for everybody? The thing is that also the audience, what pays something must leave something new, and this thing is really sad. 

This same phenomenon is visible in the competitions of the best innovation in some universities and other education actors. I have sometimes thought that many of those persons, who are taking part in those happenings are not showing their best products and innovations. This thing is visible in some courses, where students must introduce some innovations.

And the thing is that many of those innovations are very conventional. Being braver those innovations can be more interesting and in those cases is no shame to be different. The difference is the thing, what makes those competitors colorful, interesting and revolutionary. Of course, they could be good, but if the team would use bravery and imagination, the result could be fascinating and effervescent, what brings notice to those products. And of course, the feedback is a very important thing in forming the product.

They are afraid that somebody will steal those ideas, and that means that they would be far better, than what those magnificent demonstrations have been. Those happenings are a good place to perform their ideas and I have not seen any bad work in those happenings. But when we are thinking those cases like innovation fairs, they are places, where companies and teams are like rockstars.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When robots are laughing and crying.

When robots are laughing and crying.  Does the AI have feelings?  Does the AI have feelings? Or can it be emphatic? The fact is this program code that controls the AI determines if it can give empathic reactions. The problem with the human nervous system is that we don't make a difference in the writing of empathic letters or telling empathic stories human or AI. Our nervous system is not adapted to AI yet. And that's why we cannot separate text written by AI from text that made by humans.  What does somebody make with AI that can emulate feelings? The fact is that the cyborgs are useful tools for infiltration operations. The human-size robots can have WLAN/6G connections with the central computers. Or they can form a neural network that shares information between all group members. The robots can also act as walking neural network-based supercomputers. That can make complicated solutions.  In those networks, each member shares information and their data-handling capacity all o

Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization

    Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization The Earth 2.0 or officially Kepler-452b is locating extreme log distance from Earth(1).    A new Earth-type planet has been found near the star, which is similar to our own Sun. The journey to that planet would take 1400 years, even if the spacecraft will reach the speed of the light. The planet has been found in the year 2008, but the confirmation of the existence of that planet has been taken time, but in 2015 the confirmation has been got, and Earth 2.0 has turned true.  The mass of that planet is 1,9 times Earth and the temperature is excellent if we are thinking about liquid water, but the journey to that planet will take so long, that we cannot ever go in there by using regular rockets and technology. The thing is that this kind of planets are the most interesting if we are looking for the lifeforms, which are similar to us, and the problem with that kind of things is that the communicatio

Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission

  Image I Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission 1) Tunguska UFO-theory  Tunguska meteorite is the mystery, that has been solved once, but then the case has been open again because Lake Cheko was not suitable for an impact crater. That lake has been introducing as an impact crater of the Tunguska meteorite. But the problem is that the shape of that lake is like a swimming pool. And that means it cannot form by a meteorite. So the mystery remains.  Meteorites can launch the natural nuclear fission if they hit the uranium ore, and transfer the impact energy to that ore. And is the thing that the famous "Tunguska" meteorite caused that kind of effect? There is also a theory that some "UFO" explode in that area, but the thing is that it is only theory, but interesting topics for some TV-series.  So I will begin this text by handling that theory, which is one of the incredible and outstanding theories in the world. Officially there is no physical evidence of