We are above others, and if someone disagrees, that would cause problems
We all want to see that our state is better than others, and when we are facing criticism, we will rise to our back feet like horses do, when they are afraid. This thing is visible in every state and nation in the world. And the thing is that the persons like Voltaire have faced that kind of things when they have said that the British Monarchy is better, advancing and respect human rights better than the French version.
And this kind of ideas has caused problems before and after the life of Voltaire. This kind of things are interesting to search and the fact is, that Voltaire was forced exile from France when he wrote that text. The reason for that was that Voltaire said, that Frech King was worse than British King, and that was not tolerated in that time.
Every person who was suspicious about the motives of the royal highness were traitors, and that caused anger in the mind of the people because if normal people would not be angry when the king was not the best in some poor writer's opinion was somehow "different". That means that when the king was angry normal people were angry too.
The mind of the state is collective, and if the higher rank member of the society is angry every henchman is angry too. If that is not happening the disappointment of the leader would be great, and Santa Claus would not bring gifts. "This is the law of nature", is the normal argument in this kind of situation, when the leader turns all society against one person. This kind of leaders is always comparing their group to the wolfpack, where is the straight and holy hierarchy.
The person who is in the middle of the line of hierarchy probably likes that kind of things, but if the person is the last one, would that make that inmate unsatisfying. But the thing is that I represent the species, what is called human. Human has skills like discuss things without hierarch, and this thing makes us superior against wolves. But, when in wolfpacks the leaders would get angry, other members were angry too.
When the last member of the group would face trobles, nobody helps that inmate, because the hierarchy obligates only henchmen to follow leaders. If the leader face cheat, henchmen must defend the leader, but if henchman is facing the same things, nobody defends that inmate. This thing has caused that we have a democratic government. And the total or collective anger is often seen in the societies, what is controlling one person.
We all want to see that our state is better than others, and when we are facing criticism, we will rise to our back feet like horses do, when they are afraid. This thing is visible in every state and nation in the world. And the thing is that the persons like Voltaire have faced that kind of things when they have said that the British Monarchy is better, advancing and respect human rights better than the French version.
And this kind of ideas has caused problems before and after the life of Voltaire. This kind of things are interesting to search and the fact is, that Voltaire was forced exile from France when he wrote that text. The reason for that was that Voltaire said, that Frech King was worse than British King, and that was not tolerated in that time.
Every person who was suspicious about the motives of the royal highness were traitors, and that caused anger in the mind of the people because if normal people would not be angry when the king was not the best in some poor writer's opinion was somehow "different". That means that when the king was angry normal people were angry too.
The mind of the state is collective, and if the higher rank member of the society is angry every henchman is angry too. If that is not happening the disappointment of the leader would be great, and Santa Claus would not bring gifts. "This is the law of nature", is the normal argument in this kind of situation, when the leader turns all society against one person. This kind of leaders is always comparing their group to the wolfpack, where is the straight and holy hierarchy.
The person who is in the middle of the line of hierarchy probably likes that kind of things, but if the person is the last one, would that make that inmate unsatisfying. But the thing is that I represent the species, what is called human. Human has skills like discuss things without hierarch, and this thing makes us superior against wolves. But, when in wolfpacks the leaders would get angry, other members were angry too.
When the last member of the group would face trobles, nobody helps that inmate, because the hierarchy obligates only henchmen to follow leaders. If the leader face cheat, henchmen must defend the leader, but if henchman is facing the same things, nobody defends that inmate. This thing has caused that we have a democratic government. And the total or collective anger is often seen in the societies, what is controlling one person.
Comments
Post a Comment