Skip to main content

Who was David Hilbert?

Who was David Hilbert?

Everybody who has read about the "Mathematical millennium problems" is read about the man named David Hilbert (1862-1943). Hilbert was a remarkable mathematician and, sadly, the work of that man, what the great audience knows are those 23 Millenium problems, which are known as Hilbert's problems.

That man created really interesting and fascinating work with researching and fixing the Euclidean theories of geometry, and the errors in Euclidean axioms. Hilbert introduced ten of those problems in Paris  (1, 2, 6, 7, 8, 13, 16, 19, 21, and 22), and the rest of them were introduced in somewhere else.

(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hilbert%27s_problems) 

 And the thing, what makes this interesting is, what were his merits in the year 1900 when he introduced that series Millenium problem of the mathematics? He was 38 years old at that time, and maybe he had invented something big because he took that famous lecture. So who asked about that lecture?

Those 23 problems are a really good tool for calculating things like geometrical models or prime numbers, for making some suitable solutions for those things needs superfast computers. There are many questions on the list of those problems and the main problem is, who choose those problems for that list?

And why Hilbert introduced them during his famous lecture? Hilbert made very pervasive work during his career with Euclidean mathematical and geometrical problems and fixed the errors in those calculations. And he created the idea of "Hilbert's space". He investigated the errors, what was visible in Euclidean theories and natural solution.

Those errors are minimum, but they are visible. That means that the Euclidean parallel axiom is not valid anymore, and the non-Euclid geometry is not involved sentence" the sum of the angles of the triangle is 180 degrees". 

The term "axiom" is very well explained in Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axiom) but suddenly I have thought that is it possible that Hilbert made a linguistic mistake during his work, and made mistake with words "axiom" and "axal", what looks like almost same. And if the writer is tired, there would be mistakes with that kind of words.

If the persons own home language is something else than English, those kinds of mistakes are really common, and when we are thinking about Hilbert, could it be possible, that he wrote those texts in English? So if the word "axal" is meant by Hilbert, that would mean that there would be differences with the forms of geometrical structures in nature, that what they suppose to be, when Hilbert calculated them by using sharp and long decimal numbers. But this kind of things are only the theories, about that remarkable geometrician.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axiom

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Could this be the thing, that some people don't want you to know about zombies?

Could this be the thing, that some people don't want you to know about zombies? The simplest way to control zombies, which are made by using tetrodotoxin, which is called "zombie poison" is to use the automatic dispenser, which is normally used in diabetes treatment. In this case, the dispenser would be loaded by using tetrodotoxin. If the level of this poison is right, the person would be totally under the control of other people. And if the system cannot detect this poison there is a possibility to make the laboratory experiment when the staff will follow the decrease of the tetrodotoxin, and then the system can use a simple clock, which will inject poison to the body of a victim after a certain time. This would be an effective tool in the hands of military and counter-terror operators. Those zombies can be captured enemy operators, who will send back, and then they just kill their ex-partners. By using genetically engineered bacteria could be possible to create t...

The story of (Northrop?) TR3A "Black Manta"

    Image I The story of (Northrop?) TR3A "Black Manta" Sometimes there have been discussions that the mysterious TR3A "Black Manta" was a study project for the B-2 bomber.  That means that TR3A was used as the flying mockup for testing the aerodynamic and control solutions for the B-2 "Spirit" bomber. The thing that supports this thing is that the manufacturer of both planes is Northrop corporation.  Along with "Aurora" was flying one other mysterious aircraft, TR3A "Black Manta". The system is described as the "Stealth VTOL" (Vertical Take-Off and Landing) aircraft. Unless the mysterious TR3B, the Northrop TR3A is the conventional VTOL-aircraft, what is using regular jet engines, but what has the stealth-body.  Image II The thing is that the stealth-reconnaissance aircraft, which uses a similar technology with the Northrop B-2 bomber would be an interesting part of the weapon arsenal. There is a possibility that the TR3A was...

The cyborg lichen can be one of the most exotic visions of what the high-tech civilization might look like.

.     The cyborg lichen can be one of the most exotic visions of what the high-tech civilization might look like. Above is the image of the nano-submarine. There is introduced an idea, that this kind of system would equip with living neurons, which makes it like some kind of artificial bug or mosquito. The idea is that the robot can take the nutrient by using the robot tube, which acts like a proboscis. The neurons can get nutrients and the rest of the machine can use small fuel cells or the energy to that system can deliver by using the radio waves. Futurologists are thinking about the ideas, what the hybridization of the neurons and machine would look like? Could the hyper-technical civilization look like the group of midget submarines? Those submarines might take nutrients for the neurons, what is living in them. The purpose of the midget submarines, which might be size less than a couple of millimeters would maximize the survivability of the neurons. One of the most intere...