Skip to main content

Who was David Hilbert?

Who was David Hilbert?

Everybody who has read about the "Mathematical millennium problems" is read about the man named David Hilbert (1862-1943). Hilbert was a remarkable mathematician and, sadly, the work of that man, what the great audience knows are those 23 Millenium problems, which are known as Hilbert's problems.

That man created really interesting and fascinating work with researching and fixing the Euclidean theories of geometry, and the errors in Euclidean axioms. Hilbert introduced ten of those problems in Paris  (1, 2, 6, 7, 8, 13, 16, 19, 21, and 22), and the rest of them were introduced in somewhere else.

(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hilbert%27s_problems) 

 And the thing, what makes this interesting is, what were his merits in the year 1900 when he introduced that series Millenium problem of the mathematics? He was 38 years old at that time, and maybe he had invented something big because he took that famous lecture. So who asked about that lecture?

Those 23 problems are a really good tool for calculating things like geometrical models or prime numbers, for making some suitable solutions for those things needs superfast computers. There are many questions on the list of those problems and the main problem is, who choose those problems for that list?

And why Hilbert introduced them during his famous lecture? Hilbert made very pervasive work during his career with Euclidean mathematical and geometrical problems and fixed the errors in those calculations. And he created the idea of "Hilbert's space". He investigated the errors, what was visible in Euclidean theories and natural solution.

Those errors are minimum, but they are visible. That means that the Euclidean parallel axiom is not valid anymore, and the non-Euclid geometry is not involved sentence" the sum of the angles of the triangle is 180 degrees". 

The term "axiom" is very well explained in Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axiom) but suddenly I have thought that is it possible that Hilbert made a linguistic mistake during his work, and made mistake with words "axiom" and "axal", what looks like almost same. And if the writer is tired, there would be mistakes with that kind of words.

If the persons own home language is something else than English, those kinds of mistakes are really common, and when we are thinking about Hilbert, could it be possible, that he wrote those texts in English? So if the word "axal" is meant by Hilbert, that would mean that there would be differences with the forms of geometrical structures in nature, that what they suppose to be, when Hilbert calculated them by using sharp and long decimal numbers. But this kind of things are only the theories, about that remarkable geometrician.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axiom

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When robots are laughing and crying.

When robots are laughing and crying.  Does the AI have feelings?  Does the AI have feelings? Or can it be emphatic? The fact is this program code that controls the AI determines if it can give empathic reactions. The problem with the human nervous system is that we don't make a difference in the writing of empathic letters or telling empathic stories human or AI. Our nervous system is not adapted to AI yet. And that's why we cannot separate text written by AI from text that made by humans.  What does somebody make with AI that can emulate feelings? The fact is that the cyborgs are useful tools for infiltration operations. The human-size robots can have WLAN/6G connections with the central computers. Or they can form a neural network that shares information between all group members. The robots can also act as walking neural network-based supercomputers. That can make complicated solutions.  In those networks, each member shares information and their data-handling capacity all o

Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization

    Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization The Earth 2.0 or officially Kepler-452b is locating extreme log distance from Earth(1).    A new Earth-type planet has been found near the star, which is similar to our own Sun. The journey to that planet would take 1400 years, even if the spacecraft will reach the speed of the light. The planet has been found in the year 2008, but the confirmation of the existence of that planet has been taken time, but in 2015 the confirmation has been got, and Earth 2.0 has turned true.  The mass of that planet is 1,9 times Earth and the temperature is excellent if we are thinking about liquid water, but the journey to that planet will take so long, that we cannot ever go in there by using regular rockets and technology. The thing is that this kind of planets are the most interesting if we are looking for the lifeforms, which are similar to us, and the problem with that kind of things is that the communicatio

Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission

  Image I Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission 1) Tunguska UFO-theory  Tunguska meteorite is the mystery, that has been solved once, but then the case has been open again because Lake Cheko was not suitable for an impact crater. That lake has been introducing as an impact crater of the Tunguska meteorite. But the problem is that the shape of that lake is like a swimming pool. And that means it cannot form by a meteorite. So the mystery remains.  Meteorites can launch the natural nuclear fission if they hit the uranium ore, and transfer the impact energy to that ore. And is the thing that the famous "Tunguska" meteorite caused that kind of effect? There is also a theory that some "UFO" explode in that area, but the thing is that it is only theory, but interesting topics for some TV-series.  So I will begin this text by handling that theory, which is one of the incredible and outstanding theories in the world. Officially there is no physical evidence of