Skip to main content

Who was David Hilbert?

Who was David Hilbert?

Everybody who has read about the "Mathematical millennium problems" is read about the man named David Hilbert (1862-1943). Hilbert was a remarkable mathematician and, sadly, the work of that man, what the great audience knows are those 23 Millenium problems, which are known as Hilbert's problems.

That man created really interesting and fascinating work with researching and fixing the Euclidean theories of geometry, and the errors in Euclidean axioms. Hilbert introduced ten of those problems in Paris  (1, 2, 6, 7, 8, 13, 16, 19, 21, and 22), and the rest of them were introduced in somewhere else.

(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hilbert%27s_problems) 

 And the thing, what makes this interesting is, what were his merits in the year 1900 when he introduced that series Millenium problem of the mathematics? He was 38 years old at that time, and maybe he had invented something big because he took that famous lecture. So who asked about that lecture?

Those 23 problems are a really good tool for calculating things like geometrical models or prime numbers, for making some suitable solutions for those things needs superfast computers. There are many questions on the list of those problems and the main problem is, who choose those problems for that list?

And why Hilbert introduced them during his famous lecture? Hilbert made very pervasive work during his career with Euclidean mathematical and geometrical problems and fixed the errors in those calculations. And he created the idea of "Hilbert's space". He investigated the errors, what was visible in Euclidean theories and natural solution.

Those errors are minimum, but they are visible. That means that the Euclidean parallel axiom is not valid anymore, and the non-Euclid geometry is not involved sentence" the sum of the angles of the triangle is 180 degrees". 

The term "axiom" is very well explained in Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axiom) but suddenly I have thought that is it possible that Hilbert made a linguistic mistake during his work, and made mistake with words "axiom" and "axal", what looks like almost same. And if the writer is tired, there would be mistakes with that kind of words.

If the persons own home language is something else than English, those kinds of mistakes are really common, and when we are thinking about Hilbert, could it be possible, that he wrote those texts in English? So if the word "axal" is meant by Hilbert, that would mean that there would be differences with the forms of geometrical structures in nature, that what they suppose to be, when Hilbert calculated them by using sharp and long decimal numbers. But this kind of things are only the theories, about that remarkable geometrician.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axiom

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Antimatter motor

Antimatter motor Antimatter would be an effective fuel for interstellar spacecraft Antimatter would be the most effective power source in the world. It will be the most suitable motor for interstellar spacecraft, but the problem is that thing is very reactive. And actually one of the biggest problems with this kind of motor is that the gram of antimatter would turn the entire planet to the molecular nebula. So this kind of motor can produce only outside of our solar system. Producing antimatter would need large particle accelerators, and that kind of systems might look like giant donuts, what is floating on the space. There are two ways to create the antimatter motor, one is to store the anti-ions in the magnetic bottle, where the pushing magnetic field will keep those ions away from the wall of the bottle, and then the antimatter would conduct to the water or some other particle. The huge explosion or annihilation reaction would send the rocket to a very high speed. The antimatt...

Thoughts about strong leadership

Thoughts about strong leadership Everybody knows, how the dictators would rise in the power of the nation, and the thing what makes people supporting those persons is that they offer strong leadership as the way to make nation proud. And also they have always the same parroting, the foreigners and other nations have a too strong influence in the country. But what makes those persons like some Robert Mugabe or Kim Jong Un to think that they are only possible leaders, and why people would need them? Why there is nobody else allowed to try to come to the head of the state, or even try to challenge those leaders? If they are so popular as they want people to think or believe, why they don't tolerate any kind of opposition if they are done so good and big actions for their people, that they are celebrated in every home in their country. The thing that would return the morale and spine for the nation is the strong leader, who would put the state back in order and row. The thing is ...

Next-generation nanotechnology can be independent-operating molecule-sized robots.

 Next-generation nanotechnology can be independent-operating molecule-sized robots. "A DNAzyme (red) uses its binding arms to dock at a specific location on an RNA strand (yellow) and then cleaves it at its core. High-resolution, real-time NMR, Electron Paramagnetic Resonance, and Fluorescence Spectroscopy." "As well as Molecular Dynamics Simulations are used to identify the structure. And catalytic mechanisms of the DNAzyme. Credit: HHU/Manuel Etzkorn" (https://scitechdaily.com/dnazymes-how-active-dna-biocatalysts-that-destroy-unwanted-rna-molecules-work/) The active DNA catalysts are the gate to DNA-controlled, independently-operating, molecular-size nanomachines.  The DNAzymes or active DNA biocatalysts are next-generation tools for destroying unwanted RNA. The DNA molecule is one of the tools. That can use for controlling molecular-size machines. DNA is like a chemical computer program. And if the researchers can make synthetic DNA that can make exactly what the...