Skip to main content

The problem with creating the programs for artificial intelligence culminates in the self-driving cars

The problem with creating the programs for artificial intelligence culminates in the self-driving cars

Normally artificial intelligence is not dangerous, because it is a computer program and the reason why we are using computers is that they don't have own will. The thing what makes computer fascinating tool is that the system just serves people and solves the problem, and at the same time obeys the master.

And because the computer doesn't have own will, that system would ever give wrong answers or make mistakes. This is the normal way, how people think about computers and artificial intelligence. They believe that the answer to every problem is the computer, which never says "no" or give wrong answers.

The thing that computer would not have own will or ability to realize, what is right or wrong makes that tool the ultimate weapon. It also makes it the most dangerous weapon in the world. When we are saying, that computers would not make mistakes, and all mistakes, what the computer makes is made by the programmer, we should ask, is there something, what we would want to know?

When some robot can smashes to people, and the development of that system costs billions of dollars, would be easy to blame the user, if there would be an accident. And the thing what is remarkable is that if there would be only one case, when robot or car, what is driven by artificial intelligence kills people. 

What is so different in that place and person, that the controlling software of the automobile just makes the deadly error? When we are thinking that the same computer programs are used in many other vehicles and the deadly error happens only once, there is a possibility that there is something wrong in that particular car. But why only in this car was the computer program, what has an error?

The problem with the computer program is how to protect driver and passengers in the case of robbery? How a computer can be safe, and at the same time deny the cases like carjacking or robbery?

The problem with the car, what moves in the city area is that somebody can pull the door open, and force the driver out. This is not a problem in small towns. But sometimes there would be personnel, who are trying to stop vehicles and rob them. And in this kind of cases, artificial intelligence should have a protective mode for that kind of cases.

The problem with the protective mode is, that thing should protect the driver and passengers in the case of attack. But the thing is that if the program would operate the wrong way, it would risk many lives. And the assassins would turn that kind of program the ultimate weapon.

The thing is that by using the modified versions of those programs, the image recognition software would turn the car to an assassination tool. That means that a certain person can be targeted as hostile, and then the car just smashes that person. In this case, the face of the certain person would just installed to the database as the weapon, and then the protective mode turns the car as the weapon.

When the mission is done, the algorithm can remove the face from the database. And this thing would give those cars the terrifying shadow protocol, which makes them the ultimate weapons. 

As in the last paragraph has been written, one of the best and at the same times the most dangerous of those protective modes would be the infrared camera, what will notice the hidden weapons. And then the system would just smash that person, but as you know those things are a little bit more complicated than we ever thought.

That kind of protective mode would risk lives but on the other hand, the car should not stop, if there would be some kind of robber, who would try to stop the vehicle. But at the same time, the system should notice, that if there is some kind of accident, and people need help. Those things make the creation of the self-driving car difficult.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When robots are laughing and crying.

When robots are laughing and crying.  Does the AI have feelings?  Does the AI have feelings? Or can it be emphatic? The fact is this program code that controls the AI determines if it can give empathic reactions. The problem with the human nervous system is that we don't make a difference in the writing of empathic letters or telling empathic stories human or AI. Our nervous system is not adapted to AI yet. And that's why we cannot separate text written by AI from text that made by humans.  What does somebody make with AI that can emulate feelings? The fact is that the cyborgs are useful tools for infiltration operations. The human-size robots can have WLAN/6G connections with the central computers. Or they can form a neural network that shares information between all group members. The robots can also act as walking neural network-based supercomputers. That can make complicated solutions.  In those networks, each member shares information and their data-handling capacity all o

Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization

    Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization The Earth 2.0 or officially Kepler-452b is locating extreme log distance from Earth(1).    A new Earth-type planet has been found near the star, which is similar to our own Sun. The journey to that planet would take 1400 years, even if the spacecraft will reach the speed of the light. The planet has been found in the year 2008, but the confirmation of the existence of that planet has been taken time, but in 2015 the confirmation has been got, and Earth 2.0 has turned true.  The mass of that planet is 1,9 times Earth and the temperature is excellent if we are thinking about liquid water, but the journey to that planet will take so long, that we cannot ever go in there by using regular rockets and technology. The thing is that this kind of planets are the most interesting if we are looking for the lifeforms, which are similar to us, and the problem with that kind of things is that the communicatio

Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission

  Image I Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission 1) Tunguska UFO-theory  Tunguska meteorite is the mystery, that has been solved once, but then the case has been open again because Lake Cheko was not suitable for an impact crater. That lake has been introducing as an impact crater of the Tunguska meteorite. But the problem is that the shape of that lake is like a swimming pool. And that means it cannot form by a meteorite. So the mystery remains.  Meteorites can launch the natural nuclear fission if they hit the uranium ore, and transfer the impact energy to that ore. And is the thing that the famous "Tunguska" meteorite caused that kind of effect? There is also a theory that some "UFO" explode in that area, but the thing is that it is only theory, but interesting topics for some TV-series.  So I will begin this text by handling that theory, which is one of the incredible and outstanding theories in the world. Officially there is no physical evidence of