Why we are afraid to introduce the visions of the future?

Why we are afraid to introduce the visions of the future?

We can take effect on the future, but we can just give punishments because things, what are happened in the past. This is the thing, which is interesting. When people are writing fiction about the past, that thing is a good film or good book, which portraits things at least realistic. These kinds of movies and books are happening in some very well known environments or cases, but the main characters are fully fiction, but those stories are ever childish, they are meant for an adult audience.

But when somebody would write the book or makes a movie about the future, that thing is somehow childish. This is a really good thing to think about, and one really good question is why a person, who imagines the future is using imagination, but the person, who makes fiction about the past is making novels or movies. Why the writing and thinking about the future is not so respected than writing about the past?

If we are thinking about a fictional book about the Mars-base or colonies in somewhere else in the space, we are facing the thing, that nobody would punish because of those writings. But if we are writing fictional writing about some WWII officer, and somebody takes those things as the real thing, that can cause punishment for an innocent person, or otherwise saying, war criminals can be released because of those writings.

And here we are coming to the future and writing about it. We can take effect things, what are happening in the future, as I have written before. But the effect of every decision cannot be predicted if we would not have the ability to see to the future, and that means that the result of every decision has some effect, but we cannot know, what the final effect would be, and how long that effect would stand. If we would know those things, we would make very wise decisions.

So what means futurology. Some of my friends that thing is some kind of science fiction. And that thing is true from some point of view, but futurology is the science, what mission would be predicted, what some technical advantages would cause to mankind, and when we are thinking the role of technology, that thing alone is not dangerous. But if the technology is connected to some other science that thing turns dangerous.

And the question is why we are developing new tools? The answer is that we need new tools for two things. If we like to sell merchandise to markets, we must create new things for maintaining people's interest in buying new tools and new things, and that keeps markets growing. But another thing is that if we are thinking about the violence of mankind, we must develop more and more effective weapons and tools for soldiers.

And the thing, what those people are giving as an argument about the development of nuclear weapons and combat robots is that somebody would make those tools anyway sooner or later. The second argument is that those robots can be destroyed or their actions can deny by using weapons, which have not to effect to humans.

Those weapons are computer viruses and electromagnetic radiation, which would deny the communication of those drones. But there is a possibility that high power radio transmission would affect the human nervous system, and that thing makes those things terrifying.

There is a possibility, that the high power radio transmission could reboot the brains, and adjust the EEG to the new form. And that means that the computer viruses, which contains the synthetic EEG would be the next-generation weapons, which can infect the human brains, and turn the henchmen against their leaders. That is one thing, what we must realize when we are talking about the future.

Thoughts about the movie "Aliens"

Thoughts about the movie "Aliens"

Aliens could be the thing that biotechnology and greed would cause to human beings. The idea of this movie, where the Earth has been lost contact with a distant colony, and soldiers would send to find out what was happened in there. Then they arrived at the planet where Aliens have destroyed the colony on planet LV-217 and then the rest of the movie is only the shooting around.

This is the second part of the saga, where Ellen Ripley, who was acted Sigourney Weaver has faced the alien, strange creature, what would transfer fetus in the human stomach, and that creature or xenomorph would kill the host. The blood of that, I hope, the fictional organism is full of enzymes, what would melt the steel and make the killing of those creatures really dangerous and also difficult. The thing in that movie, the excitement is in, who is the next host of Aliens, what are very superior.

But when we are thinking that movie, we might think that the topics are taken from the very first British Colony in America, and the name of that colony was Roanoke in 1585. In 1887 the last ship visited in that colony. Every people in Roanoke was lost, when the British came back in 1590, and that story is a very big mystery in history. Some people believe that those first colonialists were killed in purpose.

And when we are thinking about the Indian culture, no living European has seen pure versions of those cultures, because they were influenced by Europeans. Or actually, no European ever told stories about the Indian culture in Europe.

The war between Indians and colonialists made sure that the only information about those cultures has been battle reports. And of course, Pizarro and Cortez told their stories, but Pizarro was hung after he conquered Inca-state, and the reason for that was the murder or playing vice king. Cortez was observing Indians behind his rifle, and that means that he ever spoke a single word with those people.

So when we are thinking that story and the Aliens movie, the thing is that this case has brought one really interesting though, and that was that could the company kill those colonialists in purpose. And when the Ripley came back on the planet, it was already changed. So this kind of thing is an impressive idea of the imagination and history, which can be connected.

 The thing is that this movie would bring in the mind a very brutal and feared idea, what the bio- and genetic engineering would allow people to do. When we are thinking that kind of colonies, the personnel, who would be working there could be selected from handicapped people.

That thing would make sure that those people or aliens would ever tell, where they would be coming from. And those colonialists might be genetically engineered, which means that their brains would be abridged, and those people would be controlled by using implanted microchips or electromagnetic radiation for making their work. Also in the control would be used as the subliminal command system that tells those individuals, what to do. So this is one version of the dystopia of the people away from home.

The strange thing in the history of the city of Espoo

The strange thing in the history of the city of Espoo

When we are thinking about the Westend city area at Espoo, we must think about the possibility that the person who was behind this area Arne Grahn, who have planned that district might have plans to create creative people. Or actually, Arne Grahn didn't make those plans alone. He hired an architect to make those things. The thing or thoughts that the creator of that area might have extraordinary thoughts are caused that this person was the doctor of medicine. That means that those people might have strong knowledge of genetics, and that man spent many years breeding the Finnhorses.  There is information about that man and the architects, who are planned houses and other structures like a water tower, what I handled recently. And there are many things, which might explain the strange form of that building. So search things like Arne Grahn and Haukilahti water tower from the Internet for getting more information.

So when we are thinking about things like strange-looking buildings and especially the water tower, what I was written recently, those buildings might have a purpose for stimulating the imagination. If we would take a closer look at that building, we might notice that the pylons of dish are put right in the right place, if we think that this would be the flying machine. In the flying UFO the center would be the main engine, and round it would be the auxiliary engines. But the reason for that might be a good imagination.

But when we are taking a closer look at the actions or work of architects. There is a possibility, that those people will operate under the heavy influence of somebody else. There is two possible to make that thing. One version is that somebody sits at the next to the architect and tells, what to do. And another version would use so-called white noise. In the last case, the user of white noise would simultaneously repeat, what the architect should do, and this kind of things makes those things interesting.

So what would be the purpose of this structure? When we are thinking about things, what highly trained people are saying about their motives, inspiration and other things, we must realize, that those people can think something else what they tell to others. When we are looking at strange-looking houses and other things, they are adjusting our imagination for creating new things. And do you know, how many times some people are playing things like some wargames around those structures? And they are bringing in the mid of people some kind of flying vehicle.

Some UFO sightings have also explained, that person, who has taken some drugs, is believed that they have seen some humanoid spacecraft. But when we are thinking the form of that structure, what has claimed to take from "Jetsons" TV-series, that thing is extraordinary. And of course, there are tales about the radio-transmission, what mission could be adjusted human brains to create more connections by increasing the voltage in the nervous system. There is no proves about that kind of thing, but this building would be given some people inspiration for starting to create new things.

When somebody gets nervous the thing has an effect

When somebody gets nervous the thing has an effect

The leader of OPEC (Organization of the Petrochemical Exporting Countries) has been nervous about this environmental activism, and that shows that activism has an influence on that kind of powerful actors. The thing is that the position of the leading actors of producers of the oil and natural gas exporters the leaders of those countries have guaranteed their position in the international field.

If some nation would make those actors angry, it will face the rise of the price of the petrochemical products. And the position of the ruler of those vital natural resources has been caused, that those leaders have been above the judgment of the public media.

The economic power of OPEC is really large, and that power has caused, that the Western world has got the problems to justify the bombardments, what has made the alliance, what is lead by Saudi-Arabia. And there is another very big thing in the natural resource trade. The rise of the military power of Russia has been financing by the Western World by buying the natural gas and oil from Russia.

So this makes very difficult to speak about the problems, what oil and natural gas would cause in the world. Every single kilowatt of energy, what is produced by using another method than buying the oil and natural gas from OPEC is taking money off the pocket of those countries.

But when we are talking another thing about activism, we might face the thing, that it would bring the mind of the people other things than OPEC. The thing is that there are many things, what we have kept something considered self-evident. And when we are thinking about things like cars and other things, they have been symbols for the independent people. If people would not have cars, there would be a big loss of the taxes, what the government collects from people.

But the activism itself has turned the world. In the past keeping silence about the difficult and communal things have been kept as the mark of being adult. And the activism itself has been the thing, what was somehow childish. There have been claiming, that the activism has no influence for the rulers, and people should keep their mouth shut when big boys are talking.

If somebody had a different kind of opinions should go to get some help. But as we see, if somebody would get nervous or attacks against activists, the thing what those people say has got influence. And the purpose of activism is to cause the influence on the people, that they would see the things, what activist wants them to see.

What might be the reason for the silly claiming?

What might be the reason for the silly claiming?

What might be the reason for the silly claiming?

When somebody pretends that some other person is something, what that inmate is not, the motive can be innocent, like just making other people laugh. But there might be other motives like remove some other inmate from the route to some legacy. There is much psychological research about what kind of scenarios, where the role model would cause harm in the mind of a human being.

And some of those research are pointed truth the thing, that if the child would be grown in the environment, where the fantasies are created by using violent films. If the fantasies are supported that the adults claim that the way of the act in the violent movies is justified and accepted, that thing can cause violent behavior in adult ages.

If violent movies are watched when the child would not have experiences from real life, those things will make the base of the experiences. And that kind of things might support the developing of the violent behavior model in the personality of the children. If adults claim that the child is some kind of prince or something that would thing cause problems in the elder ages.

Some of those things are very harmful to children, who cannot use critics against the authority of the adults, and if adults are claiming something to  That kind of things might be very effective tools in the hands of criminals, who might want the legacy of some billionaire family, and one of the most effective ways to make that thing, is simply make the real heir maniac in the eyes of the law. But the motive can be simple embarrass some person just for fun or getting the spouse of that person, who could get a bad reputation or sending to a mental hospital because of those jokes.

Could the roleplay be the tool for those jokes?

The reason why somebody claims being a time traveler would be very natural, and the simplest thing is just the role-play, where some character is a time traveler. I don't know, how many people actually play role-games, but there might be some versions, where those people are playing some game on the street, and then they are telling a thing, what belongs in their roles to the wrong person. And maybe that might make those people look a little bit different than others.

There could be a reason for that thing, and maybe somebody advised the wrong person to those competitors or players. And that kind of things might cause a laugh, but they are a little bit embarrassing thing if you self would face that kind of joke. Have you ever imagine how many of those role players are facing things, what are meant for a joke, but the result is that the person, who faces that kind of jokes, might be disturbing for that kind of things.

There might be some other kind of joke or misunderstanding in the childhood

When we are thinking about the situation, that some adults or elder persons of the family are claiming that the youngest member of the family is some kind of time traveler, that thing would cause that person believes in that thing. That kind of things might look unbelievable in the eyes of the other people, but if there are some individuals, who are telling that kind of things to the little children, and if those people seem like adults.

That thing might cause the children to really believe in that thing. Also, here might be used some kind of virtual reality glasses for supporting that kind of actions,  what is meant for some sick joke. Or the purpose of that thing might be that the victim of the joke would really be wanted to send to some mental hospital. For the motive of that kind of things might also be an attempt to get the legacy what would otherwise testament to the victim, but because of those mad talking that person would send to mental hospitals.

Should we separate from the Euro and get own money or not?

Should we separate from the Euro and get own money or not?

There are no simple answers for that kind of questions, like should we stay in Euro or not. This kind of questions is really good, because there is no way, how to predict the advantage of economics. The economics is science, what has one of the most difficult ways to operate because even we know the mechanisms, how this thing works, we cannot predict when the cycle turns upwards or downwards. In this text, I will handle the economics as the science, which has a very big and large scale connection to the information sciences, and that means that the way, how media reports about some things, what is happening has influence with economic advantage.

The news is modeling our way to think, and in the world of the stock marketing, the fast-changing situations in the marketing and economics  cause that even the faked news can have a really big influence, because the decision of buying and selling shares must make in the very short period after the information has been got. In the hectic world of modern information technology sharing the information is very fast. There is no time to check, how real or how even the source where the news has been got the involvement or even where it has been written.

The way to write things like human rights has a very big influence on tourism and willing to buy merchandise from some state, and that kind of things have the big influence to the economics of that nation. Before Adam Smith and his theory of "invisible hand," people thought that there is no way to control the cycle of economics, but then this Scottish economical researcher realized, that the things, how the people write in the newspapers has an influence on the cycle of the economics.

The thing about economics is to try to predict the behavior of the cycle of the economy and in the era of Adam Smith, the economics was the simple thing. But then the field of that science has been separated to the different areas, like the steel industry, electronics, computers, or ICT-sector, where the hardware is separated from the software, and there are sub-sectors like programs for business and entertainment sectors, and the last one is basically games.

And of course, there are programs for Mac, PC, and mobile platforms. The network-based solutions work in every operating system, but using them with the mobile telephone is sometimes a little bit difficult, because of the small screen. But writing the A4 document by using the mobile version of some text handling program is possible, but it takes a little bit longer time than writing it by using a tablet or computer.

So this makes the world of economics little bit more complicated than in the era of Adam Smith. The thing in economics is that this science is not independent, or economics itself is independent, but the behavior of the line on the screen depends on the things, like how much products have been bought, or how many times some computer program has been loaded. But it also depends on the situation in the global political environment.

If some state would start to behave aggressively, and if that state has nuclear weapons, it would have a great influence on the global political and economic environment. When we are looking at the currency and especially the value of the currency, we are facing the truth, that if the small state would face the threat from other countries, the things what next happen would have great influence to the economics.

If the international community would support that small nation, it would get power to its own economy. But when we are talking about the situation, that the state, what operates with nuclear weapons is going to defend the small state, would that cause a very complicated situation. Even if that state says, that it would not use nuclear weapons in that conflict, the question is "what if the opponent uses the nuclear weapons".

In the complicated relationship between the nations, what own nuclear weapons is one principle when one actor in the nuclear club goes to support some government, another one would support the opposite force of the government, what the first nuclear state has been supported. And then we must realize, that economics is really sensitive for that kind of things. In the past, the conflicts what happened in the middle-east had very large-scale influence in the economics of the world.

The thing in the way of view things might change radically if we would stop to use fossil fuel. The clean energy, what would produce locally can decrease the oil states influence the economics of the world, and the thing is, that if the oil states would lose their main export article, would that kind of change turn the economics down in those countries.

And this is only the part of the way to use the so-called "invisible hand". The other way is to use hoax information and other kinds of things, and that thing is really problematic because the influence of that faked news might be local, but if some financial operator would write faked news that some company has given the resulting warning, that person can make very big money in one moment. This makes the economics even more complicated than we have thought.

The movies and their influence on society

The movies and their influence on society

Sometimes people have claimed, that movies would not have an influence on society, but in fact, there is one problem of those things. If somebody wants to make pure propaganda, would that person use the film as the document, and that makes the film a very dangerous tool. In this text, I will write about movies, where is not used the flash photographs or subliminal messages, what would make the propaganda more effective and influential than the normal movie, what can use as the tool of propaganda.

The thing is that this kind of propaganda is hard to resist if it would introduce as the documentary and authentic information. In history is a very good example, when the media or radio broadcast have almost caused the nuclear war. The radio drama "The war of the worlds" what was piloted by the Orson Welles caused almost the national emergency when people thought that the USA was under the attack, and called to the police and Pentagon because they were listening to that broadcast.

The influence of the movies, what is pure fiction to the collective societies has not actually any researches, but the thing is that if in the movies some part of people is always demonized, and they are introducing as the "bad people", will that cause hate. The movies have great influence on the way of think of individuals if the people are watching violent movies at a very young age and if the adults will say, that the violence, what those people see in movies is tolerated.

And as the Joseph Goebbels, the minister of propaganda of the Nazi-Germany said, when the lie is simultaneously repeating people are starting to believe it. This is the problem with the movies. Even if we know that they are pure fiction, they have an influence on the way of think of the people. If we think about the influence of the films to the individual people, we must realize that those things like violent movies teach the way of think to the people, who are watching those movies.

The problem with movies is that they can use to demonize the other people, and if the adults allow looking at the violence, and teach the children that the violence, what those youngsters see is right, would that cause very bad situations and in the worst case the result would be some kind of mass shooting. And if the movies are using in the wrong purpose, like teaching that violence is the solution for young people would the results be horrifying. So that's why the movie makers must feel their responsibility when they are making their product for entertainment purposes.