Artificial intelligence and medical science

Artificial intelligence and medical science

One of the problems with artificial intelligence is that they don't have feelings. Of course, artificial would always be neutral, and nothing will make it get angry. It doesn't care about ethnic or another background and it's always fresh. And as you see the biggest problem of artificial intelligence is also it's the best strength, which makes that system very problematic and it faces many complicated ethical and moral questions all the time.

One of the greatest questions is, could the artificial intelligence someday replace surgeon or some other medical specialist. It finds every mutation in cells and tissues, which makes it a very effective tool. The robot would cut sharper than any human and it doesn't care about the time, what the operation takes, but transferring this kind of thing to robots would be extremely revolutionary vision, what needs time to think.

Medical science is a complicated thing from ethics, moral and technology. We are facing the thing that artificial intelligence is coming in the doctor's offices as well as many other places like laboratories. The computer can notice many things in seconds, which would take hours from the human researcher. Artificial intelligence can notice viruses by searching for their form, and that can also suggest the cure.

That thing would make possible to make diagnosis very fast, and that leaves the doctor time to be with the patient, and that would bring social and psychological aspect in the medical treatment. But when we are thinking about the case, that artificial intelligence would give the medical treatment, and robots would come to give injections would feel a very rare or too revolutionary thing in the mind of the people.

The thing is that artificial intelligence is a good servant but somehow bad master has been the usual reason, why people are against this kind of research and development. But when we are looking at the cases when some patients have been forgotten in the hospitals, artificial intelligence would be the good watchdog, and the system might be the form, where is marked the rooms where the medical staff has been visited, and then the things what should be done would be marked in the same form.

One of the simplest ways to make those things is just creating the system, what observes the time, what the door has been open, and how many times it would be opened during the round. And of course, the steps, and movements in the room would be recorded. That would tell, how many seconds would the nurse spend in the room, and if the change of beddings takes about five seconds, that person might be very fast, or something would be missed.

This is one version of the usage of artificial intelligence. Also, artificial intelligence can search, how many times every particular patient would press the call button during the time in hospital. This thing tells something, what the people have told to those individuals in the hospitals about things like when that button is allowed to push. But the thing is that artificial intelligence can keep the book about many other things, like how many cancer cases have been renewed in some hospitals, and are those cases focused on some ethnic or another kind of group?

And are the times of cure the same in every patient, who have similar tumors or cell mutations. This kind of records can contain information, what kind of and how strong some symptoms are justified the sick leave. And are the other treatments similar to all patients? If the person would ever push call-buttons, that would mean that person self takes things, or there is no need to care. But that thing could cause that some person would say, that the pushing of a button is prohibited. In those cases, the human would make decisions.

https://yle.fi/uutiset/3-11004657

The relationship between diversity and leadership

The relationship between diversity and leadership

A new person in a team is always different. That individual hasn't yet learned the written and non-written rules in the team. The things like who cooks coffee might mean small, but they are in a very big role in the society and social hierarchy in working place, and here we must say, that before we realize that we are racists, we cannot face the problems.

When a new member comes in the team, that person must dare to tell own ideas in the meetings, because there is some reason to hire that person. If that person would not understand that there is a role for every person in the team, that means that some person might not tell something important in the meetings. When a person is hired, the boss mission is to tell the reason for hiring, and the employee must realize, why some things are done. And if there is a disappointment, that employee must be separated.

The thing is that there are many other minorities than some ethnical groups, and for those invisible minorities we might be more racist than the being member of some visible group of minorities. Things like psychic symptoms are still things, what are allowed to use in humor, and when Donald Trump compared psychic patients as animals might look funny, and that thing might seem acceptable. Here I'm wondering, why we are always celebrating the wrist cancer week, but we ever celebrating the Tourette week?

But that thing is the attitude of the psychic patients is always negative. Also, sexual minorities are facing similar racism as members of some ethnic group. Those persons would meet very bad racist humor, and that thing might cause very bad situations. The problem of those people is that nobody sees those things by first sight. The thing about minorities is that they are groups of individuals, and when we are thinking about hierarchy, there might be some people of those groups, who have very much benefits, but those people are always crushing rights of their own.

And if we are thinking about the possibility to be only with people, who have the same ethnic background we might think that thing as isolation. The thing is that nobody must even talk about members of the minority groups, and there is a possibility that their internal hierarchy is also very pressing. Before the civil war ín the Southern cotton fields in the USA, the position of the leader of the slaves gave those leaders position as slave whippers, who raised above others in the hierarchy.

Those leading slaves were not made things what were ordered themselves. They just ordered other prisoners to make them work, and they were just whipping the others. Also, the Nazis used the same method in their concentration camps. They selected leading prisoners from the line, and then those persons just motivated other prisoners by using whips and batons.

Diversity brings challenges to working life. The thing is that there are many people, who have different backgrounds. And different backgrounds are sometimes causing that people are closing some person outside the team. This kind of thing would be a very big waste of potentials if somebody knows about things or has some new ideas, but that person would not bring those things in meetings.

If somebody would keep mouth shut, even if that person has ideas or some special skills and knowledge would feel that nobody listen. When we are thinking about people, who are working as temporary, we must ask, why that person wants to give skills and knowledge for the company, what would not hire that person, regardless how good that person is? When we are talking about diversity, that is more than education, linguistic, cultural or national diversity. 

That thing might be the also psychological or social diversity and differences between people. One bad experience in the personal history of a person might cause that some individual has a problem with social situations and attitudes for some things, what would look like natural for others, who are in that team. Here we must remember one thing, what is that those experiences are not visible while we are looking at those people, and the thing is that also positive experiences can turn against the working community.

If some people have learned blind trust to other people, that individual could tell things, that should not be told when that person answers to telephones, and a call comes from unknown telephone numbers. Those things can have destructive results for the company, and it's information security if somebody tells things like email addresses,  passwords, and usernames to telephone

Diversity is not a threat in working life. Many individuals believe that it is uncomfortable to work in the working environment, where is working a different kind of people. When we are thinking about the homogenous working community, that thing has one very bad weakness, and that is the one-sided point of view to things, what the company or its workers do.

The thing is that diversity gives one big benefit for the company, and that is that there are multiple points of view things, and that thing guarantees that every side of the things is analyzed. So this is the reason, why we must understand that diversity is an opportunity, not a threat. When we are thinking about the homogeneous working environment, there is one thing, what we are thinking, and that is everybody knows each other and everybody is similar to each other. 

And that thing is not always good when we are thinking about leadership. Leadership is a complicated thing and that means that the leader of the group must have a distance to henchmen. A position as a leader requires, that person must observe the work, what other people are doing, and that means that sometimes the leader must make decisions, what is not feeling right. But what is necessary for the company, and ib that case is best, that there is little distance between leader and henchman.

The normal terminology in far-wing radicalism is that they are not radicals

The normal terminology in far-wing radicalism is that they are not radicals

We should stop talking about nationalism and left-wing movements at the different kind of movements. There is no difference between right- or left-wing radicalism, and the result is always devastating. The thing what might give little brakes for Stalin and Tito was that they were members of the ethnical minority of their homeland.

They couldn't get support from the majority same way as Adolph Hitler could. And the thing why the nationalism was not so highly respected in the Soviet Union was that there were so many nationalities. Of course, Russians wanted people of the world think that they are the heir of the Soviet Union, and that's why there is so great nationalistic wave.

There is very long living opinion, that Russians created the Soviet Union and the entire state was created around Russia, who has rights for the heritage of the Soviet Union. And this thing makes possible to say, that Russia is the Soviet Union, what have lost some land areas.

When we are thinking about the far-wing radicalism, the normal version of their speeches is that they are not far-wing members and the things like fascism have been lost after the Second World War. The argument is similar, with the argument that Mafia does not exist anymore.

That thing is an argument, that the fascist and nazis were lost after WWII. There are some versions, that the Fascists and Nazis were some kinds of the right-wing movement, but the reality is that those movements were market themselves as the labor movement, and the nazism has got the name from their agenda of national socialism.

The difference between those movements is that national socialism is highlighting the greatness of the nation, and that thing also is supporting by the militaristic strength. When we are thinking about the power and the Marxism, the idea about the peace between labors is very good marketing speech. 

But the real socialism is looking like a little bit different than ideal socialism. There are many similarities with nazis and communists, and the reason why there were not so great nationalistic movement in the Soviet Union was that there were many nationalities in that country. Maybe Stalin had problems to create a real "team spirit" in his country because he couldn't just ask support from Russians.

He was Georgian himself, and that put him to a difficult position because he couldn't just agitate the people against minorities. That means that Stalin was one member of the very small minority in the Soviet Union. Hitler was a much better position. He could yell against Gypsies and Jews because he was a member of the majority of people. And that gave him the very good weapon against minorities. The argument of that kind of leaders in that the majority is the thing, who is ruling, and other people must follow the majority.

The problems with image recognition

The problems with image recognition

One problem with the face recognition program is that kind of software, what is used in some controlled situations like unlocking the computers in certain brightness are not suitable for recognizing the people from the streets. And another problem, what has caused problems especially in London and other areas of Great Britain is that the shadows that are falling on the face if people are using caps are making recognition very dangerous.

The problem is that the camera has also problems to get the necessary contrast if the system is looking at black people. When we are thinking about law enforcement and its relationship with minorities, we must face the thing, that many times the member of the minority community is more often stopped than the member of the majority community.

But when we are talking about the recognition system, what is used in Great Britain, I don't know are those databases linked with the systems, what are collecting data from the demonstrations, or drawing support messages for the IRA.  And that kind of things would cause also arresting in that country.

But if the image recognition would able to make so-called "rough selection" it would eliminate the chance to put the cases like shoplifting on the shoulder of some rockers. The system would recognize the clothes and deny false recognition in the cases, where the case is fresh. Sometimes thieves are using tactics, where they would claim that some punk or member of the minority community is the thief, and the artificial intelligence can pick the cases, where the stopped person is totally different looking than the thief.

The thing is that recognizing people from the natural environment is a little bit different than reading the registration plates. The thing is that the sensors are advancing, and the most modern surveillance cameras are also using laser scanners and infrared radiation areas, which makes the recognition more trusting.

The infrared systems can also block weapons like knives and guns, which are hidden under clothes. There is no problem with that kind of things. But there is another problem with image recognition, and that is political. If the image recognition programs are collecting data from multiple nations, that would uncover things, what people might keep undercover. One is that if the person often visits the embassy of Russia, that kind of things would be noticed in the counter-intelligence.

But there is another problem with that kind of things is that if this kind of automatized systems would be trusting in someday, that would cause that some big part of the work of law enforcement will be ended. Even now the system can recognize things like Rasta hair and other rocker styles. And it notices that if the thief of some other tracked person would be a member of some ethnic group.

https://yle.fi/uutiset/3-10861457