How to teach robots to follow spoken orders?

How to teach robots to follow spoken orders? 

The idea of machine learning is the same as the people way to learn things, and that's why computer game-style platforms are very interesting things to teach robots. The action or learning process is similar, what is used to teaching dogs. The robot must connect spoken words to some actions, what the programmer can do with it. 

And this makes possible to make robots, which are understanding spoken language. This method is suitable for every kind of robot, and the idea is that the words are connected to recorded actions, so when the programmers are teaching the robot to open the door, they might say "open the door" and then they would transfer to use the virtual workspace, where they can use data gloves and probably Virtual Reality glasses, and make the action by using the virtual movements by using character, what is similar what is seen in the computer games. After the system has been successfully recorded the action, that means that the command "open the door" would activate this kind of movement series. 

The machine learning means that the character, what is the thing that is controlled by a computer would say some words, then the character is moving and acting as the programmer would want. And then those words are connected to the actions, what the programmer has made for the character. 

Moving of the character can be done by using the game platform, and then the virtual character would be used to test the effectiveness of the movements, and then they can transfer to the robot, which will connect those movements and other actions to the words, what the person says. This kind of technology can also be used with combat robots. And those robots can follow the orders, what the commander says without excuse. 

This kind of robot would be very interesting in the many dangerous actions. And thing what makes character dangerous is that some game character would get the physical form. When we are thinking about computer games the programmer, who will make commands to those systems could use the computer games to selecting the most suitable series of movements, and then the commander must just select the most suitable movements and connect the voice command to that series of movements. 

When we are thinking about the actions of robots every kind of action is a series of movements. That means the system would just connect the movements to the command, and that makes that kind of robot very dangerous. The robot itself would not care, what kind of commands it would get, and if the voice recognition or other safety system accepts the command, that allows the operator to give the command "sweep that area", and then the robot will do everything, what includes in that action. So this kind of thing can be used in the Pentagon's terrifying new robot army. 

Image.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/5/50/Cylon.jpg

Brexit with or without an agreement, that is the message of the Boris Johnson the political Ed Sheeran

Brexit with or without an agreement, that is the message of the Boris Johnson the political Ed Sheeran

Do you notice the similarity between images of pop-star Ed Sheeran and the political star Boris Johnson, who is now the prime minister of Great Britain? Boris Johnson is now the prime minister in Great Britain, and he says that Britain would leave the EU with or without agreement. And Johnson has been said, that Great Britain would not pay the severance pay. But who cares about those things anyway, would the EU declare war to Great Britain, if that money would not be paid. What is the real choice in that situation?

The thing is that the Brexit is the storm in some glass of water, what locates in some cabinets, and if that thing has something to do with regular people is, that they will lose 12 000 workplaces. That thing does mean anything when people are hearing when Britain is great again. But do you know, what makes Boris Johnson a very effective politician?

The answer is simple Boris Johnson is different than others. The image with unkempt hair would be similar to Ed Sheeran, and because Johnson seems different the reporters would come to his and ask things. And the media writings where that man claimed to be some kind of "motormouth" makes him more interesting. Of course, tough speeches are also giving trust in the eyes of electors, and the terms what that man uses are very easy to understand.

But who cares about those things. Boris Johnson is a very popular person in Britain because that kind of people is normally very successful politicians. Boris Johnson is like the political version of Ed Sheeran, the man who would talk things, what regular people wants to hear. And that makes those persons very easy to understand. They will drive their political agenda very effectively, and that makes them easy to hear.

The symbols in the Orthodox icon

Copyright: Finnish Orthodox church

The symbols in the Orthodox icon

An idea of the icon above this text could be warned that someone else can control the person, who stands in front of the people. There are many symbols in the religious art, and one is to give warning, that the person, who stands in the front of the people is not necessarily the person, who has written the texts or even made the speech. Icon painting is the symbolic interpretation of some topics, and the painting itself creates symbols in the mind of the people.

So as the psychologists would say, this kind of paintings would activate the symbol function in the brains of the people, or some people face the activation of the symbol function. The thing, what people see in the icon depends on the person, and there are many points of the way to see things in those religious paintings.

The icon is one of the main characters in the Orthodox church, and above this text is a picture of the icon. This icon is portraying "The mother of the God" as this type of paintings mostly does, and there is one interesting detail. There is also Christ Pantocrator-icons, what portray men, but the "Mother of the god" might be a little bit more popular character.  But this is writing about symbol function, not the details, how popular some icon type is in the Orthodox churches.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Icon

A circle where is the person, who is mentioned as the Jesus Christ, but there is something else in this icon, and that thing is that the painter would actually want to give the sign for the people, that inside ordinary looking person might be something, what ordinary people would not even think. That thing could be some scientist like a nuclear physicist, head of the police or even the king of the nation. Somebody sees gunpowder around the character, who is like in the chamber inside the woman, and that kind of things symbolizes the power, what is waiting to be released.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christ_Pantocrator

The thing in the iconic painting and this kind of icons is that the character of the "mother of the god" could actually be a woman or man. Sometimes around the character, what is painted inside the "mother of god" is black, and sometimes those icons look like a little bit scary, and the character would send the bird, what is the symbol of the god. The thing in the black circle and that character is that they are warning, that if that character would be harmed, that would release something bad or dark across the earth.

The idea of this type of icons is made people think that is if are making violence against the next king or tsar, they would face the hate, and in fact, the next tsar could be anybody. The thing is that the icon is actually the symbol of something, and the idea of this kind of icons is to bring in the mind of people that the person, who would stand in the front of them is probably not telling stories, what that inmate has been created self.

There could be somebody else, who writes stories, what that person tells to people, and maybe there is somebody in the group, who will tell to that person, who is controlling the speaker if that speaker tells something, what was not involving to contracts. That means that the maker of the text would own the speaker and that means that actually somebody would control that person. And there is, of course, the thing, how that controller keeps the person in hand, and denies to share information without permission.