The artificial intelligence in service of society
When we are talking and writing about artificial intelligence, we see only risks and hazards like bombs, and we don't see the great opportunities, what that kind of thing can offer. The thing is that artificial intelligence can alert the personnel if there are some people, who have problems with moving, or they have the signs of handicapped, and that would be told that the person needs special attention.
The second thing what artificial intelligence can do with the society is collecting data from the traffic, and then the computers, what are controlling the traffic flow can turn the cars to the routes, where is no rush when the inner flow of the traffic would close the route. This kind of solution can disassemble the rush and make traffic more flowing and faster, which will decrease pollution.
That means that the system would meter the time, what the driving to some point would take, and when the time of the drive would across some limit, the system would turn the traffic to another route. The data what system must take is the waste of fuel of each car model, and then the waste of fuel with a certain speed, and when the system calculates that the waste of fuel, while the car is standing or driving with slow speed would across the certain point, the traffic control would send the message to those car models and tell that it would be cheaper to turn some other road.
And when we are thinking the collection of the data, the system might ask, is the person going to a certain city, or if a person wants the targeted information the data of destiny can be given to the system and the computers can calculate the ideal route for that trip. When we are thinking about traffic, we are facing a situation, that what we are afraid of. If the data, what is given to the system is sharp the system can create sharp solutions, and this is problematic for humans.
We are afraid to share the personal data with the network, but we can talk about our holidays and other things freely in the places like cafeteria or pub, and we don't even know who is listening. But when we are sharing data to the officials, we are afraid that some policeman knows, where we are. When we are thinking about computers, they are best in handling the big data flow.
And the traffic is a very good place to test artificial intelligence, which uses active screens and existing technology, like mobile telephones and digital car radios. The entire system would be only the algorithm, which collects data and uses it to interactive communication between participants. This means that the system can serve people rally effectively if it has the necessary information.
Showing posts with label traffic. Show all posts
Showing posts with label traffic. Show all posts
Friday, November 29, 2019
Monday, October 14, 2019
Electric vehicles of tomorrow
Electric vehicles of tomorrow
Hydrogen production in the vehicle can revolutionize the traffic.
If we would produce the hydrogen for fuel cells in the car, that kind of vehicle can be operated in the highways of the future. In this case, the electricity for electrolysis can be taken from the socket, and the car can use fuel cells or batteries optionally. And those fuel cells would make the operational radius of the vehicle longer, and that thing can be the hybrid car of tomorrow.
We can think that the combination of electric- and hydrogen operating car is one of the most interesting choices, what we can think. If we would tank the car by using water and then scatter it to hydrogen and oxygen in the car, we might have a suitable vehicle, which has no pollution. But there have been many other attempts to create a car, what doesnät need external fuel during the history, and many of them are basing the use of the electric motors.
Systems what base the difference of pressure or muscle power
One of the most interesting things in electric vehicles is that they can produce their electric power without external fuel. In some cases, there are two chambers in the car, and in another would be the vacuum. If between those chambers is the generator, what is connected to the turbine, and the air or some other material like water or alcohol would float between those chambers, the vehicle can create its own electric power.
And of course, the vehicle can be equipped with the dynamo, which can be used by similar pedals that are used in the bicycles. The thing is that using gear, the rotating speed of the dynamo would be very high, and that allows creating the electric power, which can use in the small compressor.
That system needs less power than loading the batteries, and it can be used to create the vacuum to another camber. Then the water floats to another chamber and loads the batteries of the cars. And the driver can change the chambers when another chamber is filled. The thing is that the system can also use the compressor, which is connected straight to pedals. And that kind of system would be quite an interesting thing because it is not addicted to the weather.
And of course, the car can be equipped with solar panels, lightweight wind generators, and they can load their batteries from the floating water. The thing is that dynamo, what can be used in that kind of operations will be very small, and composite materials would make things like propellers lightweight, and the lightweight materials can also be used in the gearboxes.
That would revolutionize the driving if that kind of system would someday come to markets. And the thing is that those lightweight materials would make the system very light. But what is the real reason, why we haven't got electric cars before this day? There is no explanation for that, and maybe the reason is that those cars would not seem so pleasant than cars, which are using normal fuel. The explanation is normally that the loading of the battery is taking too long.
Wednesday, October 9, 2019
Social media and traffic
Social media and traffic
We all know that remote work would be an effective way to decrease pollution. But if we are driving cars, we should point our focus to driving. And in the past, the driving schools were mentioned that even the channel of the radio should not change while driving. Maybe that thing tells something about the safe driving what is the primary objective while driving vehicles on the road.
When the driver, who uses social media closes the road is a new element for the traffic. And the thing is that this new threat to safety is an effect of new kinds of technology with attitudes to traffic and driving. Things like GPS navigators and mobile telephones are causing the addiction to see news and social media in traffic lights, which is one of the things, that people should talk about driving schools.
When people are looking at the screen driver's eyes will turn off the driving direction. And that increases the possibility of the accident. The new technology with automatic gear is causing that the car is easy to handle in one hand, which means that the mobile telephone would take off the pocket in traffic lights, and that causes problems.
But how we could solve that kind of question? One version is starting to sell things like cameras, what is observing the position of the eye, and allows people to use the user interface of the mobile device by the smart glasses or straight from the windscreen.
The system detects the point of the macula or certain point of the blood vessels of the eye, and that would allow a person to use the user interface by targeting the cross on the icon. Then that icon is marked by blinking the eye. This thing operates by smart glasses or HUD-screen, and a similar system is used by Stephen Hawking, while he sat in a wheelchair for communicating and controlling that thing.
But as we know things like cars and traffic are serious, because the safety of traffic is always a problematic thing. People are hoped to turn to use public transportation because the space in the city area is ending, and the traffic causes very much carbon dioxide emissions. The thing is that the city area is planned for private cars is gone forever.
When the modern city model was created the idea was that driving in that area was very easy. And it could still be that, but the thing that was forgotten is that the number of cars increased. And the parking areas turned out to be too small for the bigger cars. Also, the number of parking lots were turned to be too small for the increasing number of cars.
That thing caused that public transportation has turned out to be the primary tool for traffic solutions. The modern solution is that mass transportation systems are supporting each other. The system looks like a tree. Local transportation moves people to one place to another in a close distance, but it also delivers passengers to long-distance vehicles.
This kind of solution is an effective and fast way to travel. And that is hoped to save space for vehicles, which are necessarily moving in city areas. Those vehicles are cars, which are owned by people, who are living in the downtown. The problem is always that the usage of public transportation is varying. In the rush hour, the trains and buses are full, and in the middle of the day, those vehicles are traveling empty. And that thing causes problems in transportation.
https://yle.fi/uutiset/3-11008834
We all know that remote work would be an effective way to decrease pollution. But if we are driving cars, we should point our focus to driving. And in the past, the driving schools were mentioned that even the channel of the radio should not change while driving. Maybe that thing tells something about the safe driving what is the primary objective while driving vehicles on the road.
When the driver, who uses social media closes the road is a new element for the traffic. And the thing is that this new threat to safety is an effect of new kinds of technology with attitudes to traffic and driving. Things like GPS navigators and mobile telephones are causing the addiction to see news and social media in traffic lights, which is one of the things, that people should talk about driving schools.
When people are looking at the screen driver's eyes will turn off the driving direction. And that increases the possibility of the accident. The new technology with automatic gear is causing that the car is easy to handle in one hand, which means that the mobile telephone would take off the pocket in traffic lights, and that causes problems.
But how we could solve that kind of question? One version is starting to sell things like cameras, what is observing the position of the eye, and allows people to use the user interface of the mobile device by the smart glasses or straight from the windscreen.
The system detects the point of the macula or certain point of the blood vessels of the eye, and that would allow a person to use the user interface by targeting the cross on the icon. Then that icon is marked by blinking the eye. This thing operates by smart glasses or HUD-screen, and a similar system is used by Stephen Hawking, while he sat in a wheelchair for communicating and controlling that thing.
But as we know things like cars and traffic are serious, because the safety of traffic is always a problematic thing. People are hoped to turn to use public transportation because the space in the city area is ending, and the traffic causes very much carbon dioxide emissions. The thing is that the city area is planned for private cars is gone forever.
When the modern city model was created the idea was that driving in that area was very easy. And it could still be that, but the thing that was forgotten is that the number of cars increased. And the parking areas turned out to be too small for the bigger cars. Also, the number of parking lots were turned to be too small for the increasing number of cars.
That thing caused that public transportation has turned out to be the primary tool for traffic solutions. The modern solution is that mass transportation systems are supporting each other. The system looks like a tree. Local transportation moves people to one place to another in a close distance, but it also delivers passengers to long-distance vehicles.
This kind of solution is an effective and fast way to travel. And that is hoped to save space for vehicles, which are necessarily moving in city areas. Those vehicles are cars, which are owned by people, who are living in the downtown. The problem is always that the usage of public transportation is varying. In the rush hour, the trains and buses are full, and in the middle of the day, those vehicles are traveling empty. And that thing causes problems in transportation.
https://yle.fi/uutiset/3-11008834
Sunday, May 19, 2019
Have you ever thought that sometimes companies are making service wrong way in purpose?
Have you ever thought that sometimes companies are making service wrong way in purpose?
Persons, who give "Michelin stars" are working undercover
Have you ever heard about things like "Michelin stars"? Those stars are really wanted, and sometimes there are people who want to find out, who is the person, who will give stars to restaurants, and that is quite difficult, because persons, who give those stars are not allowed to tell that thing to the people, who are working in those restaurants.
Because those people's contract denies telling that thing to the workers or owner, that place cannot serve those criticizers better than normal customers. And this thing is sometimes really embarrassing. The magazines what are publishing that list are not publishing any material, what can uncover the identity of those people, who would give stars to those restaurants.
Mention about bad service would uncover the identity
So there is sometimes used the one really nasty thing, and that is that some members of the crew are serving the customer by wrong way, and they are looking at the things, what that person writes in reports. They hope to find the mention of the bad service from some of those articles, which are published in some magazines.
There is a story that in some cities public traffic office is the buses or taxis, where is not an air conditioning, or the drivers would not use that in purpose. That thing would help to find the persons, who are working as the inspectors. Those people, who drive that kind of buses are thinking that the inspector will write about this thing to the report, what is read to the drivers.
Persons, who give "Michelin stars" are working undercover
Have you ever heard about things like "Michelin stars"? Those stars are really wanted, and sometimes there are people who want to find out, who is the person, who will give stars to restaurants, and that is quite difficult, because persons, who give those stars are not allowed to tell that thing to the people, who are working in those restaurants.
Because those people's contract denies telling that thing to the workers or owner, that place cannot serve those criticizers better than normal customers. And this thing is sometimes really embarrassing. The magazines what are publishing that list are not publishing any material, what can uncover the identity of those people, who would give stars to those restaurants.
Mention about bad service would uncover the identity
So there is sometimes used the one really nasty thing, and that is that some members of the crew are serving the customer by wrong way, and they are looking at the things, what that person writes in reports. They hope to find the mention of the bad service from some of those articles, which are published in some magazines.
There is a story that in some cities public traffic office is the buses or taxis, where is not an air conditioning, or the drivers would not use that in purpose. That thing would help to find the persons, who are working as the inspectors. Those people, who drive that kind of buses are thinking that the inspector will write about this thing to the report, what is read to the drivers.
Thursday, May 9, 2019
Writing about truth and lies
Writing about truth and lies
If we want to find the absolute truth, we must find the evidence, and that kind of things are really difficult things. When somebody comes to the courtroom, that person would tell, that the fault was that inmate, who is sitting on the chair of prosecuted. This is the fictional example of how human brains work, and I have read it from some magazine. But then that person starts to tell that other person made something unexpected during the situation, like accelerated speed, while the charged person came to the main road from behind the triangle.
That thing means that the person who is charged got hit to the right side of the vehicle, but another person accelerated the speed and the distance was safe when the turning was done. Without evidence that case would be difficult to the solute. The thing is that we cannot know who is telling lies if there are no marks for the burning rubber what is the mark of the fast accelerating or something like that. In that case, would the person confess about being guilty, but then the mind would change.
In fact, in the mind of the person, who came in the front to another vehicle behind the triangle, would create in the mind the model, where another person is guilty anyway, and this kind of things are really dangerous. That inmate would start to tell the stories about the acceleration of another vehicle and cause very bad problems to the opposite side.
This is one thing, the law doesn't mean a thing when the person would feel to be on the right side. And the behavior would be pumped full of energy when that person stands in the bar with the whiskey glass and surrounded by friends, who are supporting that story, without even seen what has been happened. Or they haven't even seen that accident car. But this thing, what might feel really nice could cause problems for the opponent.
If we want to find the absolute truth, we must find the evidence, and that kind of things are really difficult things. When somebody comes to the courtroom, that person would tell, that the fault was that inmate, who is sitting on the chair of prosecuted. This is the fictional example of how human brains work, and I have read it from some magazine. But then that person starts to tell that other person made something unexpected during the situation, like accelerated speed, while the charged person came to the main road from behind the triangle.
That thing means that the person who is charged got hit to the right side of the vehicle, but another person accelerated the speed and the distance was safe when the turning was done. Without evidence that case would be difficult to the solute. The thing is that we cannot know who is telling lies if there are no marks for the burning rubber what is the mark of the fast accelerating or something like that. In that case, would the person confess about being guilty, but then the mind would change.
In fact, in the mind of the person, who came in the front to another vehicle behind the triangle, would create in the mind the model, where another person is guilty anyway, and this kind of things are really dangerous. That inmate would start to tell the stories about the acceleration of another vehicle and cause very bad problems to the opposite side.
This is one thing, the law doesn't mean a thing when the person would feel to be on the right side. And the behavior would be pumped full of energy when that person stands in the bar with the whiskey glass and surrounded by friends, who are supporting that story, without even seen what has been happened. Or they haven't even seen that accident car. But this thing, what might feel really nice could cause problems for the opponent.
Sunday, March 24, 2019
The rebel of artificial intelligence can begin the error in programming
The rebel of artificial intelligence can begin the error in programming
Have you seen the movie "2001 Space Odyssey"? There the artificial intelligence turns against its creators or actually the crew of the spacecraft is the victim, what the artificial intelligence tries to kill. The thing is that in real life this kind of situation can happen because of the mistake, what is done while the programmer has been done the code. The thing is that there are millions of lines of code for each action, what the computer must control, and the thing is that there would be billions of actions, what the artificial intelligence must make if it must be autonomous.
And in somewhere in the billions of subprograms can be the error, what makes the artificial intelligence very dangerous. In the fictional case of "2001 Space Odyssey" and artificial intelligence HAL would this error be that the coders, who have made the code have forgotten to determine, what is the difference of crew and machines. The mission of HAL would protect the spacecraft, and the orders, what that system has got for the situation, that some part of the spacecraft would work in the wrong way. The mission what the artificial intelligence has is just shut the device, what operates wrong way, and call the crew to see and fix the problem.
The thing is, that if the member of the crew is working wrong way, the artificial intelligence tries to shut the crew down, and this causes the situation where the computer starts to kill people. When we are thinking about the threats of artificial intelligence, we must say that artificial intelligence is not dangerous in a normal situation. And then we must continue to think about this thing sharper, and we are facing the fact, that artificial intelligence is not dangerous if it is in the computer, there are no connections to the Internet or some physical devices.
But if we want that artificial program would drive the car, we are facing the thing, that this kind of programs must properly be tested in real life, that it would work properly. And in the first cases, the use of the autopilot should be reserved for the cases, where the car is moving in the highways. In the city, the area would the use or manual control is necessary long time after the use of autopilot is possible in the highway environment.
The thing is that when we are thinking about the situation, that the cars are operating with autopilots, we are facing the thing, that we must radically change the traffic system, and the all vehicles on the highway must interactive communicate together and traffic control computers, and that would not mean that the driver can sleep behind the control wheel. The thing is that this kind of environment, where multiple vehicles are using collective artificial intelligence could turn dangerous if there are some mistakes in the code, or some kind of computer virus would infect that environment.
And here we are facing the situation, that the computer program would turn dangerous if there are errors in code, or it would operate with the thing, where it is not meant. That means that the computer program, what controls the car might not be suitable for tractors or excavator. And in those cases, the situation might be very bad, if the controlling program, what is programmed to save the fuel or batteries, would turn the tractor to the highway because the programmer has not to mention, that the vehicle what the artificial intelligence controls is the tractor.
The program asks what vehicle it will control, and if the vehicle answers "John Deere" but not mention that is a tractor, or there is no determination what the "tractor" means, would the situation be very "interesting" when the tractor turns to the highway because the traffic is most flexible in that case. If every vehicle will have an autopilot, the traffic control can just drive cars over the tractor fluently. But this would need that every each of the vehicles would have artificial intelligence and autopilot, what has an interactive connection to traffic control.
The artificial intelligence would be very dangerous in the cases, where they are operating the wrong way, and one of those cases is that they are operating by the way, where they are not meant to operate. In the traffic, the automatic cars would be extremely dangerous, if they do not understand that some people would not follow the rules, and one of the things is that if the artificial intelligence controls some vehicle, and it would face the situation where another car would jump ahead behind the "stop" sign.
This is the thing that is very bad, and the thing is that for properly work the self-driving cars would not be a very common thing in the years and working properly this system needs the change that every car would have autopilot. In this situation, the traffic would be flexible and comfortable. But it demands that every car would have the autopilot. And that means the entire environment must be renewed, what takes the time.
Have you seen the movie "2001 Space Odyssey"? There the artificial intelligence turns against its creators or actually the crew of the spacecraft is the victim, what the artificial intelligence tries to kill. The thing is that in real life this kind of situation can happen because of the mistake, what is done while the programmer has been done the code. The thing is that there are millions of lines of code for each action, what the computer must control, and the thing is that there would be billions of actions, what the artificial intelligence must make if it must be autonomous.
And in somewhere in the billions of subprograms can be the error, what makes the artificial intelligence very dangerous. In the fictional case of "2001 Space Odyssey" and artificial intelligence HAL would this error be that the coders, who have made the code have forgotten to determine, what is the difference of crew and machines. The mission of HAL would protect the spacecraft, and the orders, what that system has got for the situation, that some part of the spacecraft would work in the wrong way. The mission what the artificial intelligence has is just shut the device, what operates wrong way, and call the crew to see and fix the problem.
The thing is, that if the member of the crew is working wrong way, the artificial intelligence tries to shut the crew down, and this causes the situation where the computer starts to kill people. When we are thinking about the threats of artificial intelligence, we must say that artificial intelligence is not dangerous in a normal situation. And then we must continue to think about this thing sharper, and we are facing the fact, that artificial intelligence is not dangerous if it is in the computer, there are no connections to the Internet or some physical devices.
But if we want that artificial program would drive the car, we are facing the thing, that this kind of programs must properly be tested in real life, that it would work properly. And in the first cases, the use of the autopilot should be reserved for the cases, where the car is moving in the highways. In the city, the area would the use or manual control is necessary long time after the use of autopilot is possible in the highway environment.
The thing is that when we are thinking about the situation, that the cars are operating with autopilots, we are facing the thing, that we must radically change the traffic system, and the all vehicles on the highway must interactive communicate together and traffic control computers, and that would not mean that the driver can sleep behind the control wheel. The thing is that this kind of environment, where multiple vehicles are using collective artificial intelligence could turn dangerous if there are some mistakes in the code, or some kind of computer virus would infect that environment.
And here we are facing the situation, that the computer program would turn dangerous if there are errors in code, or it would operate with the thing, where it is not meant. That means that the computer program, what controls the car might not be suitable for tractors or excavator. And in those cases, the situation might be very bad, if the controlling program, what is programmed to save the fuel or batteries, would turn the tractor to the highway because the programmer has not to mention, that the vehicle what the artificial intelligence controls is the tractor.
The program asks what vehicle it will control, and if the vehicle answers "John Deere" but not mention that is a tractor, or there is no determination what the "tractor" means, would the situation be very "interesting" when the tractor turns to the highway because the traffic is most flexible in that case. If every vehicle will have an autopilot, the traffic control can just drive cars over the tractor fluently. But this would need that every each of the vehicles would have artificial intelligence and autopilot, what has an interactive connection to traffic control.
The artificial intelligence would be very dangerous in the cases, where they are operating the wrong way, and one of those cases is that they are operating by the way, where they are not meant to operate. In the traffic, the automatic cars would be extremely dangerous, if they do not understand that some people would not follow the rules, and one of the things is that if the artificial intelligence controls some vehicle, and it would face the situation where another car would jump ahead behind the "stop" sign.
This is the thing that is very bad, and the thing is that for properly work the self-driving cars would not be a very common thing in the years and working properly this system needs the change that every car would have autopilot. In this situation, the traffic would be flexible and comfortable. But it demands that every car would have the autopilot. And that means the entire environment must be renewed, what takes the time.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Computer researchers published a new algorithm that revolutionizes web management.
The new database structures require new and powerful tools to manage databases in non-centralized solutions. The new data structures can be ...
-
Starlink and miniaturization of the communication satellites The dream of Elon Musk is to give every people free Internet across the world...
-
The time travel in mind or using imagination Sometimes we are forgetting one thing about data handling and memory. The thing what we are f...
-
Lightweight vehicles are flexible tools in the hands of the military Jeeps were effective tools in the hands of SAS Lightweight vehicle...