Small writing about Brexit

Small writing about Brexit

Brexit is a good example of cases when the decisions are made too fast. If there would be enough time for that kind of action, those discussions would be made with soundly and sharpness, that the contracts that are needed in those cases would be made that way, that there would not be any surprises after that. When we are thinking cases like contracts between corporations, there is lots of text to read. And there are lots of emails, including lots of suggestions and counter suggestions in that kind of case.

So the discussions in the contracts between the states are not easier at all. When we are thinking about the case, when somebody just wants to leave some union of lands, there are many practical questions, what might be solved anyway. Those problems are in taxes, and especially the VAT, and another is how many bottles ow wine British people can bring to Britain from France?

They are not easy to solve. And when we are thinking things like paying taxes of incoming tools, we might think that British people would begin to buy goods from the Irish companies, and that would be a very good way to avoid taxes. Of course, some people can live near the border, and go to Barbery and bring every single sausage and bread from the other land.

And when we are thinking about things like channel tunnel, the Normandian shops can send the food deliveries to the people of England by using that train and courier service. The same thing can be made in Northern Ireland, and maybe that kind of question should be thought before the beginning of that kind of divorcement. And what we have learned in this case. If people who are making contracts have time to discuss things, the British would not in this situation.

What was the real reason for the Iraqi war?

What was the real reason for the Iraqi war?

One of the reasons for the invasion of Iraq was that Saddam Hussein didn't predict that some people would make suicide attack against the World Trade Center. But that thing was only the last thing of the series of actions, what caused the allied invasion to Iraq, or at least gave the reason for the attack.

Many times I have written that there were many, so-called real reasons for that war. One of those reasons was that Saddam Hussein openly opposed the resolution of the United Nations Security Council, what was under the scrip by all members of the Security Council, what has the veto right. And that was a very bad thing for the authority of the United Nations and so-called superpowers. Also, the acts of formed Yugoslavia military forces in the Yugoslavian war forced the United Nations to authorize the military actions against Iraqi.

But there were also many other reasons, and one was that the United States wanted to demonstrate the effects of its weapons and that means that the international weapons trade was the major reason why allied forces attacked Iraq. The thing is that if we are thinking about what was the so-called real reasons for that operations, we must say that the war was the quantum of solace. When Saddam Hussein simultaneously broke the orders, what came from the United Nations, and then the political atmosphere in the United States turned to support the military actions because of the 9/11 attacks.

The thing that Saddam Hussein gave support for Osama Bin Laden along with the actions, what that man ordered before those suicide attacks against the World Trade Center and Pentagon justified the USA offensive military action against Iraqi. The thing was that Saddam Hussein miscalculated the U.S government and the nations will of attack against Iraq caused the attack. The thing is that maybe Saddam didn't know what were the plans of the Al Qaida, and he believed that the Al Qaida was followed the orders of the Taliban and mullah Muammar Omar.

And if Saddam Hussein discussed only with Omar, that attack to the USA would come as surprise. The demonstrations, where people show support for those terrorists caused hate and then the political atmosphere turned for supporting the attack against Saddam Hussein, and because the money for the war would get back from Iraq by the contracts of rebuilding and benefiting the oil of that country, the political support for the offensive military action for Iraq were guaranteed.

Because of the anti-militaristic movement of the USA Saddam Hussein thought, that he could deny the United Nations inspections to the chemical plants and nuclear laboratories. And then the world would forget that Iraq attacked against Kuwait about ten years before the second Iraqi war. Saddam Hussein thought that being silent, and playing some games, the flight prohibition zones in the Iraqi airspace have not stayed longer, and then that man wanted to take his revenge.

Or this is how normal people believe that the road went to the second conflict. But the thing is that the problem in that area is that it has been a very good zone for introducing military equipment, and also the money feels good in the pockets of Russia, what also wants to sell weapons to that area. And also if the Russian missiles and aircraft would be effective, the success against Western aircraft and other equipment would be good marketing for those products.

And also otherwise Western military manufacturers want to sell their products for the nations, who are attacked by the Russian equipment. The problem is that even the weapon selling to the countries, what are at war, the thing is that those orders are simultaneously broken, and if the orders are not followed by some military exporters, they have not to effect at all. The thing is that the Middle East is the area, where military manufacturers can test their newest and deadliest technology against real targets. That thing is causing the civilian casualties, but the truth is that in countries like Jemen, the actors are Arabs, and that makes difficult to justify somebody.

The weapons that are used are American made, but the users were Arabs and that thing causes many problems in the justification. The Russian military has used very strong firepower in Syria, and that thing is a little bit embarrassing for many people, who normally blame the USA because of the actors in the conflicts are other countries. And that makes impossible to justify the USA alone, even if the weapons that are used were made in the USA, the thing is that the enemies are justified as terrorists.

This thing is really bad, and embarrassing also for the coalition and weapon sellers, what are looking at the civilian victims from the TV. And the thing is that many Arab nations like Saudi-Arabia use mercenary soldiers for flying their aircraft, which is effective, but the thing who gives orders to those pilots is hidden from the public audience.

The writing about the Russian sea routes.

The writing about the Russian sea routes.

How Russia would make a trade or otherwise benefit the western sea routes if it goes to war against Western nations? This is one very big question when we are looking at the news, what are telling about the Russian new naval exercise in the Baltic Sea. If the Russian Navy wants to break to the sea, the Murmansk region would be better placed for that kind of actions, because the open sea would give more room to make movements than the Baltic Sea.

The Russian invasion is a very good threat and at the same time argument for people, who want to return to the past, when people like President of Finland had the right to term people like processors in the office. That kind of rights are somehow interesting because they are telling, that president must hear only things, what that person wants.

The thing is that somebody believes that the Russian naval exercise would give the leaders of the political movements opportunity to go behind those exercises and request that the people should keep their opinions about Russian politics and exercises in their mind. Fear is the best weapon, what mankind has ever created.

And that means that when the newspapers are full of stories about the power and effectiveness of Russian weapons people would believe to shut their mouth because of the fear of the Russian weapons is so high. And of course, there is an international journalist, who would get in trouble, if somebody will write something against the benefit of the Russian state or its benefit. 

This thing brings my mind one very interesting idea, and that is, why those reporters would go to follow those naval exercises? If somebody would feel getting in trouble in some areas, should those places avoid? Why people go to follow that kind of exercises if they are afraid of violence or attack against themselves?

Sometimes I have heard, that this kind of things have been a popular way to make some people keep their mouth shut. The offering self as a hostage would seem nice, but in those cases, a person must be sure, that there is found friends on another side. If there are no friends, there would be a very bad situation, because if somebody else would not care about this person at all. And those cases hurts. But Russia doesn't take hostages, because it has underlined the international contracts about this kind of things.