Social media and the problems with strong leadership and racism

Social media and the problems with strong leadership and racism

People are asking about strong leadership always when their own point of view is opposite to the decision, what was made in the parliament. And always if the strong leader is against our own point of view the things, we are blaming them as the dictators. The social media has brought one thing in the people mind, and that is even in the 21st century is the people, who are not tolerating other people, because they have a different skin color than other people have.

Racism is the thing, what is always connected to the strong leadership and the same thing is identified with militarism and authoritarian governments. And that thing is the thing, where we should put more focus on the educational system. Of course, we can focus the police work against those groups, but the thing is that prevention of racism also prevents the violation, because racism is causing hate, and then the minorities are starting to buy guns, and that will cause the spiral of hate, what would stand in the time of generations, like what has been happened in Northern Ireland.

The revenge and counter-revenge have continued decades, and the hate is the thing, what cannot sweep away with the peace contract. The thing is that the hate and racist writings have sometimes made because of the opposite block wanted to denigrate. Sometimes those writings are meant for denying the freedom of speech acts, and the thing is that the strong leaders are sometimes using those things for making the freedom of speech and publishing more difficult by putting the limits of the use of social media and another kind of things. When somebody is supporting the changes in political laws or some new system, we should ask those people, what would be their own position in the new system?

The thing that the racistic discussions have been noticed on the Internet, would help to locate those persons, and that kind of thing would make the world safer. The thing is that the normal skinhead is a similar gang member with other gang members, and we can live with those people. But the problem is the people, who are working as the police and security guards, and who have a racist attitude on their work. Those persons, who use the trusted position against other people are more dangerous than any normal gang member can ever be.

Thoughts about strong leadership

Thoughts about strong leadership

Everybody knows, how the dictators would rise in the power of the nation, and the thing what makes people supporting those persons is that they offer strong leadership as the way to make nation proud. And also they have always the same parroting, the foreigners and other nations have a too strong influence in the country. But what makes those persons like some Robert Mugabe or Kim Jong Un to think that they are only possible leaders, and why people would need them?

Why there is nobody else allowed to try to come to the head of the state, or even try to challenge those leaders? If they are so popular as they want people to think or believe, why they don't tolerate any kind of opposition if they are done so good and big actions for their people, that they are celebrated in every home in their country.

The thing that would return the morale and spine for the nation is the strong leader, who would put the state back in order and row. The thing is that this kind of things are real populism, and another way to think is, that the strong leadership and leader would release the ordinary people to work and follow the orders, what is coming from the great leader, who would be the messiah for the people.

And also things like pornography are absolutely not tolerated in the dictatorial society. Those things are bad for the morale and that thing needs a very strong police force, what prime mission is to make spine to the people, who are working for the leader. This kind of things is a very effective way to work, and when the henchmen are supporting the leader, everything would be a very good thing, and everything is fine.

But when we are thinking about the person, whose position is to sit in the leader's chair in the state, we must ask one question, who is the thing, what the leader would serve? This kind of things are really interesting, because of the thing, what makes people tolerate many dictators and make them also hesitate to force them off the control, is that they don't know, who is the real leader of the nation. If they see somebody standing in the front of them, and keeping the speeches, what are full of the nationalism and proud of the nation, they don't know who keeps the real force in the nation.

There might be many men in the castle, who are playing vital roles, but who don't ever show their faces to the people. This kind of things are really interesting things, and the question, what is always interested me is that who actually tells dictators, that they are very nice men for their people? And what makes them think, that they are so important, that any political resistance or the work of opposition must be quelled.

This is the thing, what might sometimes come in the mind of the ordinary people when they see the palaces and security protocols around those people. Do they want to live that way? In fact, those leaders can confess every henchman, what that person would hire, that that individual is the only right leader for the nation. But who confess the dictator, that the only possible leader for their nation is the person, who looks at them from the mirror? Or do they create the idea about the long term leadership in their own head?

Or is that idea given to them some witch doctor, who told them that they are the only and the best leader what the state can ever get? And maybe it feels fine to see own picture in every corner in the capital. It might make those people feel like a rockstar when they are driving with their limousine and bodyguards around the city.