The problems with robots and national security

The problems with robots and national security

On the Internet are many films about robots, which are created looking at exact humans. Those robots speak, act and look like real persons, and in some cases, those robots would be used as the spies or undercover police operators. The thing is that there is not so disgusting thing, what robots cannot do. And that makes those machines suitable tools for slipping the agent in some persons nearest social environment.

The robots can act as a spouse, but they can deliver every single bit of data, what they have collected to the command center. The thing is that the human-looking robots would have WLAN, and mobile Internet connections for making sure, that the robot would get enough assistance from the cloud computers, what mission is to help the system finish its mission with offering calculating assistance. Or in hardest cases, the human operators can solve the problem, and send the solutions straight to the hypothetical robot, what would be the remote-controlling unit or extension of the multilayer computer system.

When we are thinking the robots like "Sophia", what are the example, what happens, when artificial intelligence would connect to robot, what might in future look exactly like a human, and feel like a human, we would face the thing that this kind of devices are really good intelligence operators, because they have not feels like humans. That's why those robots are really dangerous. They can do anything for accomplishing their mission, and if this kind of robots is connected to artificial intelligence or large-scale database, what has been collected from some person, they can offer perfect satisfaction and come close of that target. 

The thing is that those robots would feel nice, they might satisfy persons deepest willings, and they can look like a human. That means that those machines can even marry their targets, and even if they are looking pretty, those robots might have hydraulic muscles and radiological weapons, which makes them dangerous. And thig, what makes them different with people, is that they cannot feel things like a human.

But they can emulate humans very well. Those robots can write diaries, and they are seeing if the person doesn't like some texts, or lies, when they are asked have they read those markings. The thing is that those diary markings would be made for flatter the target. And when the robot does something, it would not feel pain. That means when the arm is turned to a certain angle, the robot might say, that thing hurts. But the real thing is that those robots cannot feel anything.

Lack of feelings makes robots difficult to handle. If somebody would give some mission to the robot, it would do everything to make that mission accomplish. The thing is that if the robot plays some kind of spouse, it would have programmed the ghost protocol, that the targeted individual must be eliminated if that inmate would realize that the spouse is some kind of robot. And also those robots, what is created for intelligence work might be very jealous, because of another relationship would risk the mission of the machine.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sophia_(robot)

History is like it has been written

History is like it has been written

This is the thing, what every historian must realize. If somebody says something, that thing is not possibly true. And every truth in the world has been written to serve somebody's benefit. That means that history is always written by people, who have been involved in the cases, what they are written, and also the other people, who have been made those writings have been addicted about the things, what other people have been told to them.

When we are talking about things, almost every one of us is telling things, by making own role in those cases the best as possible. That means that those stories are colored, and sometimes hiding the real role of the teller. And sometimes the way, that the person tells stories by downplaying their role, would cause that the investigators become suspicious.

In criminal cases, the witnesses are almost every time claim that they have been forced to join the gang. They are telling, that they are only small actors, but sometimes they are making bad mistakes and the question, what rises is that how they know all those things? Did they stare the crimes in the next of the maker, or did they involve every meeting, when the boss of the gang makes plans for operations like robberies? 

How they could know everything if they were not involved in those cases? Why didn't they tell police right away, when the criminal activities began? The lawyers would ask them, why they were hanging in the gang so long, and suddenly start to cooperate with law enforcement? This is, of course, the common writing about crimes, and that thing is a very interesting topic in many American crime movies.

Those cooperatives are taken a part in the criminal activities long time, and suddenly they wanted to become the informer. What is the reason for the sudden change to the relationship with the law? That kind of things interests law enforcement in the real-life as well in fictional cases. And we will see many true and fictional stories about that kind of things.