What makes populists so popular?

 What makes populists so popular?

If we are thinking the politics there is always the possibility. That the politician will start to follow some very noisy. But a small marginal group. The small marginal groups are many times boosting their agenda with weapons. And that is the reason why I should put the image of R-4 carbine at the top of this text. Guns are the things that guarantee publicity. And those things also guarantee authority for the people who carry them. But in this case, I will not put the image of the weapon in that place. 

The reason for that is he tells people what they want to hear. Same way as other populists he has an explanation for everything. The reason for that thing is the "political elitists". That imaginational group is denying people to think what they want. And the thing that makes Trump somehow terrible is that he plays the same game with marginal groups. The thing that makes marginal groups frightening is that they are boosting their agenda and opinions with weapons. 

And those weapons are, of course, in the main role of that kind of people demonstrations. The reason why regular people want to "respect" Trump. Is that he uses a very interesting way to act.  The official part of the supporters of Trump is using very controlled language. But the people who are not the "official part" use death threats people who are "on their way". Of course, those threats are published in newspapers. And of course, Trump has nothing to do with anger. That his supporters feel. 

The people who are working in the field are in a great role. If somebody shoots them that thing rises martyrs in the hands of Trumpists. There is, of course, forgotten that some of those "demonstrators" who are angry, because their man did not get in White House because that man got too few votes carried guns. 

x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x

The description of the disinformation is that is misinformation that somebody delivers on purpose. The modern electronic networks guarantee that also disinformation is spreading very fast. There are four things about disinformation. 

1) We should afraid of disinformation

2) And also deliverers of disinformation can claim that real, confirmed information is disinformation. 

3) Everybody can deliver disinformation

4) Making sure that something is disinformation can be harder than people ever imagine. 

x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x

Riots are stressful situations. And those situations make weapons more dangerous than they normally are. 

The case of Kyle Rittenhouse is a good example of how weapons are used as a threat. 18 years old boy shoots two demonstrators by using an automatic rifle. And the court released him. Rittenhouse claimed that those victims threat him. The thing is that if Rittenhouse's victims were black. 

That thing could cause racial demonstrations or even riots. Riots are stressful situations. And Kyle Rittenhouse is a young man without any experience and training to face any kind of violence. The gun in the hands of that kind of man in a stressful situation is always dangerous. 

But Rittenhouse shot white men. The situation was a riot that began in the case that police shot a black man who resisted arresting. Both black and white politicians want sometimes benefit from the situations where a white cop shoots a black person. 

Or the thing is that in the modern US politics is seen the dangerous polarization. There is enough for people who want to make politics with those things. The white cop shoots a black man. And that is the reason for the riot. The cops are racists, and then that thing causes the counter riots. In every riot is people who want just steal property. 

There could be professional criminals who provocate riots for causing disorders. Those people are breaking windows and stealing property by using that kind of riot as a mask. 

The stories of purpose provocation in the cases of riots or "Agent provocateurs" might begin from the professional criminals who provocate riots for causing disorder. Then those people will kick windows of the shops in, and steal things that they want. There are also stories that the members of the Ku Klux Klan are taken apart in some national rights demonstrations for provocating riots. But the coordination of that kind of action is not proven. 

That black man was of course, unarmed. That is the truth that is told in the media. Until somebody thought that there was a gun. That thing can explode the situation. 

The fact is that the attitude of policemen might be so-called "overloaded". When the media and superiorities are telling stories about the high crime records, crack houses, and homes full of weapons in those areas. 

That thing causes that the police is seeing those areas as more dangerous than normal people. And then they are "seeing weapons" more often than normal people. 

That thing causes a dangerous situation and if somebody yells "gun" that means law enforcement might feel that the other people are in danger. And then they open fire. There is a possibility that if the arrested person has a gun. And that is drop to somewhere some other person like a drug dealer or drug user will simply pick that gun from the streets.

The thing is that if there are people around with assault weapons "protecting their property" causes stress to cops who don't know why those people are surrounding them. Riots are always a stressful situation and the possibility that there is a gun in the pockets of rioters causes stress to law enforcement. But when rioters are armed with assault weapons. The stress is very high. There is needed only a small reason And the entire situation turns to the massacre. 

They cannot know are those people in the same gang as the person they try to arrest. Or when the attitudes of the cops are fully loaded to face violence when trainers are telling about shootings and media is full of mass shootings that thing can cause the situation that some cop will open fire. The thing that makes cops more willing to use guns is the personal threat. If there is some threat calls to the telephones of the cops can cause that the cop to "see guns" more often than usual. 

The death threats are causing violence. 

Another thing that the people who are playing the "non-official" line of the supporters of Trump are telling about the threats and other things like post packages full of shit to newspapers. The message of those people is simple.  "If you are against us, you will get lots of shit in your life". This means that people who are against Trump should be quiet. 

The thing is that publicity about things like death threats is the thing that is used for pressurizing people to be quiet about things like weaponized right-wing nationalists whose mission in this kind of theater is to bring force for people who believe populists. And the thing that populists are offering is "strong leadership" and "great nation". 

The thing that is making those things very dramatic and also addictive. Is that those people are offering something concrete for their followers. That thing is the assault weapon with great respect. The weapons are carried in the demonstrations against the police. And that thing makes those situations very stressful. 

Image:https://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/2019/october/grant-cyber-letters-marque-manage-hack-backs

Nothing that happens outside the senses have no effect

Nothing that happens outside the senses have no effect

There have been questions, why Greta Thunberg had so much influence on people, and some Indian women who made 10 000 socks to ordinary people left without attention? The reason for that is that publicity for things made effect the actions of Greta Thunberg, and the things, that some practical people are done have happened outside the media. So this is the thing, that we must realize. Only things, that are coming to public knowledge influence the knowledge of people.

If some brave people are making socks in some room, and nobody knows that it cannot influence the masses. But if somebody goes to the UN and gives the speech, that thing affects, because everybody is seeing that thing. This is the role of information in modern society. It gives us outstanding power and responsibility. The information is a powerful tool to manipulate people. And in modern society, there is a possibility to deliver also faked data, which is a very sad thing.

And the case of Greta Thunberg has brought one very sad thing in publicity. That thing is that somebody thinks that threat is allowed the method to influence people. The threat is the way, how dictators are acting against their opponents. But also this kind of case is a very good way to bring that kind of thing like trolls to public knowledge. Trolls are one way to make people afraid and keep their mouth shut.

But what if somebody would publish those trolls, where some adult people are delivering the gospel, that they have the right to make everything, what they want. This kind of thing might look nice, but then we can see, what kind of things those people are using in their threat.

So one advice, what people have given on the internet is that also the trolls can be published, and maybe those people want to show how funny they are. And maybe the rest of their friends are laughing with them, and call them to their home and play with their children.

Or what would you like people, who are delivering threats, that they would rape some girls? That kind of thing might seem nice in the eyes of those people, but what their mom would think about that kind of words? Would they want to see that kind of texts in their social media? But those people who are sending those trolls might think that they are funny.

About trolls and cheat

About trolls and cheat

When we are looking like people, who want to work for a good purpose, we are facing some interesting details. Those people would get great and positive publicity, but after that, the net trolls are taking them to their target.  At the case of Greta Thunberg, we see the method, how net trolls are working.

There are people, who are repeating theme name and then the words "with Asperger", and that seems like ask, who will take that person under the cheat. The thing is that those people might think, that others will afraid them. During the positive publicity, the trolls are silent, and then after a couple of years, those people are striking on the Internet and social media. Have you ever used Quora?

In that social media applications, you will see how real-life net trolls are working. First, you will answer to some question, and then somebody would answer you with a list of symptoms, where is listed symptoms like "Asperger" "schizophrenia" and another kind of things, what people feel sometimes very negative. Then they are starting to threating people with psychiatrists and another kind of things. The model, what they normally use in those kinds of things is the list of things, what person has been written, and then they expect, that somebody else will fill the ends of those sentences.

So here I must remind, that if those people are working in some psychiatric institute, they have professional secrecy about that kind of things. Have you ever face trolls in the working life? Those people might feel very scary in their mind, but the thing is that when you see one of those persons in real-life, they might not feel scary at all.

Once, when I went to the workplace there were send the message in the social media there was mention that 2% percent of people have something, and then I went in. In that message was a photograph of the face of that person. But when I saw the entirety, I just thought that "this cannot be real". There was a person, who looked as sick.

All body was destroyed by drugs and alcohol, and the skirt of that person was not washed. So when I saw that person, I must ask, did that thing used the social media account by self. Those people are really interesting because they do not look like any kind of users of social media, and the question is how somebody follows them? Has somebody opened the media by using their name?

Those questions are a very good thing to ask, and if that kind of person might look like having very much friends, we must ask, why others are following those people? And in the cases, where somebody looks like narcotics user, we must also think, that there is somebody, who is using the account for that person.

The world under memes and trolls

The world under memes and trolls

Memes and trolls are part of everyday politics. And as you might see those things are an extremely effective way to scatter and control people. The thing is that the master of those kinds of information actions is a Russian troll factory. The way how those people are acting is always similar. Most of the data, what that instance would deliver is targeted to the leaders of the nations, as we have seen in the "Panama-case".

At the same times, the media is filled with the films of the military personnel, who are kicking nice karate-kicks and introducing highly motivated military exercise and skills, what might look like a little bit scary. The message is clear "if you mess with us, we will crush you". One of the models, what that troll makers use is the use of superlative nuclear weapons as the introduction, how people should afraid Russian military. In the real-life, the data, what is shared about that type of weapons is somehow filtered.

The destruction and effective areas of those nuclear weapons have ever shown, and the thing that the most powerful nuclear weapon in the world, the "Tsar bomba" what power is estimated 50-60 megatons has created the pressure wall, what was orbiting Eart three times. This means that it would cause very heavy damages in Sankt-Petersburg, even if it will be detonated over Riga.

The high powerful nukes are a scary thing. They are also acting the shield and cover for creation of a new type of nukes. But I will write about those nukes later in this text.

But there is one detail missing when the data of that detonation, what happen above Novaja-Zemlya in 1961. The thing is what was the altitude, where the measurements were done? In the ground level, the pressure impact would have a very big effect, but the air and mountains would resist the pressure wall. If we think that the same weapon would detonate underwater, the results would be the giant tsunami and the destruction in both coasts of the ocean would suffer very big damage.

All ships would be destroyed in a large area because the pressure would cut the keel or break the bottom of those ships, and that kind of destruction could face every ship in the entire ocean. The pressure wall would travel on the ocean floor in very thin material, and that would give the water an extremely strong effect. If this bomb would detonate in the Pacific ocean, the pressure impulse would travel three years in the canyons of the bottom with power, what is strong enough to destroy the submarine.

New "surgical" nuclear weapons are easy to carry under the fast attack aircraft. And even the jet fighters like MIG-25 can find new roles when they benefit the most modern technology.

But there is another type of nuclear weapons, which are as well scary. Those small-sized nuclear weapons are called SADM (Special Attack Demolition Munition) or "briefcase nukes". The size of those nuclear weapons is very small, and there are rumors, that some laboratories have tested the fission- or neutron bombs, what are made by using californium or neptunium.

The size of those weapons might be like some bread and the detonation system would just push the bites of this highly radioactive material together. The system would install in a briefcase, and if the case is covered by using leaf gold, that nuclear weapon could easily slip in the building, and then it can cause very bad damages. Small-sized nukes are base of so-called surgical nuclear weapons, what can installed in bazookas or shoot to target by using small-size missiles.

There are tales about the Hellfire or AIM-9 Sidewinder missiles, what are equipped with those surgical nuclear weapons. And also Russian MiG-25 "Foxbat" is claimed to carry miniature nuclear missiles. The thing why some military specialists believe those rumors, is that MiG-25, what is Mach 3-class interceptor carries only four AA-6 "Acrid" missiles, could be suitable also for use of that kind of attack plane. The reason, why this thing has brought in mind, is that this very old but extremely fast aircraft is still in service. And new technology gives new roles also for old-timer aircraft.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mikoyan-Gurevich_MiG-25