The case of Dr. Stanislaw Burzynski, and his radical cancer treatment

The case of Dr. Stanislaw Burzynski, and his radical cancer treatment

Sometimes researchers are prosecuted that they are delivering too optimistic information. The thing, what researchers use are the sources, what is given to them, and if their conclusions are wrong, the reason could be in the information, what has given to them. When somebody wants to bring the new medicine to marketing, that product must pass the very intensive and sharp tests. And of course, things like wrong hope must not be taken in those tests. 

Sometimes has claimed that some chemotherapy or other cancer medicals can affect only the patients, who have certain blood type. But there is no evidence about this kind of cases, where blood type effects to the power of the medicine. 

There is a strange story about the man, who has probably invented the most revolutionary treatment for cancer. The thing, what makes this case interesting is why the trials against this man began so early? This is the case, where the cancer was care with so-called antioxidants is interesting because Burzynski was made those experiments by using the new medicine in clinical conditions, and that means this man needed permission for those tests.

In this text is a link to the film and other data, what is visible on the internet, and those links are conducted to the therapy, what Dr. Stanislaw Burzinsky has made in this very difficult area of medical sciences. The thing, why I write this is the fast actions of medical authorities, and as you see those people lose their case, and the clinic has nice homepages, where you might see what was the result. 

And soon when he reported the results to the Texas medical authority, that instance tried to remove the medical license of Dr. Burzinsky. This is an interesting part of this case because of the lack of chemotherapy must be seen in the records of the hospital or that clinic. So is the reason for those prosecutions something like choosing the patients? And here I mean is there somebody, who was not healed?

Sometimes there are patients, who are not taking their medicals because medicines make them sick, and some people have the psychical need to stay in care. This kind of things are so-called Münchausen syndrome, what is the need to be in the hospital, and cancer would bring those people attending. Münchausen is the syndrome, where a patient is asking for attention by playing sick, and sometimes cancer would bring people to see those patients in their home. That causes the need to make cure longer by leaving medicals, and this thing is really dangerous because the strongest cancer cells are leaving in the body, what causes cancer would become more deadly. 

And the superiority of Dr. Burzynsky must know about this experimental treatment. If we are thinking that 40 patients had this cure, that means this medical treatment must be given a long time, and if there is some kind of problems with that kind of cure, those supervisors must be seen those things. So if that treatment was not effective, why the superiority of Dr. Burzynski didn't make a report to authorities? When we are thinking about antioxidants, they are chemicals what are denying cells to get oxygen, and this is the thing, what supports the effect of that antioxidant, what might in this case just close the oxygen source of those cells. 

But as you see there are many types of cancers, and I don't know, what kind of tumors Dr. Byrzinsky treated by this kind of medicals, and this means that this product would not be a hoax. But if we are thinking this kind of medicals, there is one possibility, and that is that there is something, what medical authorities don't want people to know about this kind of chemicals. I don't know what is the effect of this antioxidant. The thing is that if the antioxidant acts to every cancer types in the world, that invention, what is made 30 years ago might revolutionize the cancer treatment. 

And the thing is that the trials against Dr. Byrzinsky have continued over 20 years. That thing is very remarkable, in this very interesting tale about revolutionary medicine, what is claimed as a hoax. But if that man has made some mistakes or faked documents, why the medical authorities are not reported to police or published those documents, what causes the prosecutions. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WILCeNkzmHo

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WILCeNkzmHo

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OBm2NSMeMhk

https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/about-cancer/cancer-in-general/treatment/complementary-alternative-therapies/individual-therapies/antineoplaston-therapy

https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Burzynski_clinic

https://www.burzynskiclinic.com/

https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diseases/9833-factitious-disorder-imposed-on-self-munchausen-syndrome

The information delivery and the legitimization of spying

The information delivery and the legitimization of spying

Information is a very effective tool in the hands of people, and persons who have something to hide are very deep troubles in the modern world. The thing is that computers and algorithms are making profiles of people, and they find out if people have something to hide in their private life.

Lack of social media and unwilling to use social media applications are telling that people have something problems, and another thing is that if the social media applications, what are saving costs of the telephone calls are allowing to make phone calls, what are untraceable from the telephone bills is a really nice thing. But the problem is that those applications might collect the data, or they can uncover if a person has problems with writings.

Many times people, who are living by writing are facing things like plagiarism. The plagiarism is the use of texts or some other artistic product without permission and by marking it in own name. So when a person plagiarizes that kind of product, that means stealing the product. If you write things on the Internet, you will sometimes things like plagiarism detection, what is allowed to see in the sources of data transmission. 

Social media is a problematic tool because it would uncover if a person doesn't make texts self. But there is another way to use it in the tool of intelligence work. When people are upset about their privacy and make things like cases in the courtroom, the officials would just find out, who is paying the bills of the lawyers. Also, those people are profiling things, like what kind of people those cases are supporting.

And this kind of things is a really bad thing if somebody wants to hide something or control the net use of the family members. But the computers are giving an ultimate tool for tracking people, who are somehow weird. The thing is that computers are collecting many types of data, and one very interesting thing is that this collected data can also uncover people, who have been teased or somehow faced something strange in their life.

Another old gravestone

Another old gravestone


In the next text is simultaneous repeated one word. And here I must say, that the thing is that I have thought many times, what is the story behind that signature? Was there something special, what that person made in those cases? Or was it made for remembering people for something?

When we are looking at this old gravestone, we might face interesting detail in that memorial. Of course, the grave is left without attention, but if there is some remarkable person, I thought that family would be interesting about that grave. But how important and the remarkable person the long-term juror has been?

There is a signature of the juror, and the thing, why I know that this man was the juror, is that there is mentioned, that he had honorific, what was admit by the head judge of the court to the person, who has made the long career in the court system as the juror. So this kind of details makes me interesting about this kind of things, because if the family members of that man must be protected, why they mentioned the position of that graved person as the juror.

The thing is why this signature is marked on the gravestone? This kind of things are remarkable details in the graves, and tell that there is something special about this kind of persons. And of course, why the position as the long- term juror has been mentioned? This kind of details makes the research of history so interesting.

Was there something special about this person, except that he was working as the juror in a long period? Nobody makes those things just for fun, and here we must say, that there must also be some reason to put the signature on the gravestone. This kind of things makes old cemeteries interesting. And as you might notice the grave has not been taking care. Why nobody visits there?

Writing about truth and lies

Writing about truth and lies

If we want to find the absolute truth, we must find the evidence, and that kind of things are really difficult things. When somebody comes to the courtroom, that person would tell, that the fault was that inmate, who is sitting on the chair of prosecuted. This is the fictional example of how human brains work, and I have read it from some magazine.  But then that person starts to tell that other person made something unexpected during the situation, like accelerated speed, while the charged person came to the main road from behind the triangle.

That thing means that the person who is charged got hit to the right side of the vehicle, but another person accelerated the speed and the distance was safe when the turning was done. Without evidence that case would be difficult to the solute. The thing is that we cannot know who is telling lies if there are no marks for the burning rubber what is the mark of the fast accelerating or something like that. In that case, would the person confess about being guilty, but then the mind would change.

In fact, in the mind of the person, who came in the front to another vehicle behind the triangle, would create in the mind the model, where another person is guilty anyway, and this kind of things are really dangerous. That inmate would start to tell the stories about the acceleration of another vehicle and cause very bad problems to the opposite side.

This is one thing, the law doesn't mean a thing when the person would feel to be on the right side. And the behavior would be pumped full of energy when that person stands in the bar with the whiskey glass and surrounded by friends, who are supporting that story, without even seen what has been happened. Or they haven't even seen that accident car. But this thing, what might feel really nice could cause problems for the opponent.