When does the state turn to serve the individual?

When does the state turn to serve the individual?

For some philosophers, the state is thing what is above all, and the reason for that is that the state has established to serve people. So the people of the state must serve the state. In this philosophical hypothesis, both sides of the relationship between the state and individual persons would both get the benefit of this relationship, where the state protects the individual and for that process, each individual must give their stakes.

This is one way to say, that the state is above all. The reason for that might be some people thought that the apple of power was actually the hand grenade, what could kill everybody, who was against the king. If the king was angry, that person could use the hand grenade.  

The words of the philosophers have been searched and researched for hundreds of years. And still, nobody doesn't know, what exactly those people thought or what they meant when they wrote their thoughts. There are always thoughts that some philosopher has meant, what that inmate wrote.

That means that the thing is seen in their texts, there might be many meanings in their writings, and sometimes I have thought, how much those great persons could be written, if they have not written their ideas to paper? When we are thinking about things like the relationship between an individual and the state, those texts causes strong feelings even today.

And if they would be found in 18th. century, that might cause a very dangerous situation. So what would Voltaire do with network-based publication tools? When we are thinking about the role of the individual in the state, we might find the level, where the state starts to be one man. 

The idea of that has been copied from the famous phrase, what Luis XIV said once. "I'm the state" would be a very interesting way to rule the country. That makes the ruler unlimited user of power. But there is one little thing, and that is that what if the state loses the war? Would the king have anything, why other people leave that man alive?

The king is in the middle of the state, and that person cannot escape if the war goes bad way, and henchmen tell always, that the king has given every order int the state. And they afraid that the king would punish them if they would not follow the orders, and one of the best explanations is that some of those henchmen believed, that the apple of power was the hand grenade, what the ruler would use against the henchmen. Was that true or false, that thing is unknown.

We are above others, and if someone disagrees, that would cause problems

We are above others, and if someone disagrees, that would cause problems

We all want to see that our state is better than others, and when we are facing criticism, we will rise to our back feet like horses do, when they are afraid. This thing is visible in every state and nation in the world. And the thing is that the persons like Voltaire have faced that kind of things when they have said that the British Monarchy is better, advancing and respect human rights better than the French version.

And this kind of ideas has caused problems before and after the life of Voltaire. This kind of things are interesting to search and the fact is, that Voltaire was forced exile from France when he wrote that text. The reason for that was that Voltaire said, that Frech King was worse than British King, and that was not tolerated in that time.

Every person who was suspicious about the motives of the royal highness were traitors, and that caused anger in the mind of the people because if normal people would not be angry when the king was not the best in some poor writer's opinion was somehow "different". That means that when the king was angry normal people were angry too. 

The mind of the state is collective, and if the higher rank member of the society is angry every henchman is angry too. If that is not happening the disappointment of the leader would be great, and Santa Claus would not bring gifts. "This is the law of nature", is the normal argument in this kind of situation, when the leader turns all society against one person. This kind of leaders is always comparing their group to the wolfpack, where is the straight and holy hierarchy.

The person who is in the middle of the line of hierarchy probably likes that kind of things, but if the person is the last one, would that make that inmate unsatisfying. But the thing is that I represent the species, what is called human. Human has skills like discuss things without hierarch, and this thing makes us superior against wolves. But, when in wolfpacks the leaders would get angry, other members were angry too.

When the last member of the group would face trobles, nobody helps that inmate, because the hierarchy obligates only henchmen to follow leaders. If the leader face cheat, henchmen must defend the leader, but if henchman is facing the same things, nobody defends that inmate. This thing has caused that we have a democratic government. And the total or collective anger is often seen in the societies, what is controlling one person.

Etruscans and Lucius Cornelius Sulla

Etruscans and Lucius Cornelius Sulla

When we are talking about Etruscans, we are thinking one of the most unique high-cultures in history. Romans hate those people, and when we are talking about the case, where Lucius Cornelius Sulla started to persecute Etruscans, the truth is that this word might mean only the people, who Romans thought as their enemies. When we are remembering the tale of the establishers of the Rome, Romulus, and Remus defeated the brutal Etruscan king, and that means that Romans hate Etruscans.

But that word might mean the people, who were the enemies of Rome rather than the original Etruscans. Because Etruscans were unique high-culture, they were the good target for agitators, and when Sulla rose in power of Rome, the Etruscans had lost their power, and the reason why Sulla started an offensive against those people was that they were different than him.

The strong role of women in the Etruscan society was like a red coat for the Romans, whose society was very patriarchal. And that thing gave a very good weapon to the hands of agitators, who flattered the males of the society. Their argument was that the place of women is at home, and that was one thing, what Sulla used in his propaganda during persecutions.

Were Saint Joseph and Mary actually descendants of refugees from Rome, who fled the persecutions of Lucius Cornelius Sulla?

The Christmas tale about Saint Joseph and Mary from the 2000 year ago is remaining in the minds of the entire Christian world. And there is one reason, why they would not have the room in the city of Bethlehem. That reason would be that they were actually foreigners, and somehow I have thought that were they the descendants of the people, who fled the persecutions, what were ordered by Lucius Cornelius Sulla? That thing could explain also the execution of Jesus Christ in the first Eastern.

But who were people, who were persecuted by Sulla? That consul started the war campaign against Etruscans and that was the reason for those persecutions and mass murders, what was ordered by Sulla. The thing about Etruscans was that they were the class of people in Rome, and they were very well known about their teeth prosthesis.

But for some reason, Sulla and people, who were standing behind him hated those people, and they wanted to kill the Etruscans. When we are thinking about the Sulla and the person, who was succeeded by Gaius Julius Caesar, we must remember, that when Sulla arrested the people, there is a change that people who made those teeth prosthesis were somewhere else than the person who sold that thing, and maybe Sulla ever found those people.

Here comes again the word "maybe". And maybe Caesar was looking for them during his war campaigns because Romans believed that some of those persecuted people were able to flee from the other lands. But this is of course only the thing, what comes straight from the imagination.