So who was Lazarus, the man who Jesus awake from dead?

(Image I)

So who was Lazarus, the man who Jesus awake from dead?

In the paintings, the faces of Lazarus have sometimes covered but in the painting "The Resurrection of Lazarus", what Juan de Flandes has been painted on the16th century (1) has given or rather saying shown the faces for the Lazarus, what rises from the grave, but in the second painting, what I have chosen the face of Lazarus have been covered (2). That painting is remarkable because Lazarus seems surprised, and somehow childish or willing to laugh people. He seems to show a long nose to Jesus. 

That character might be a woman at first, but the Juan de Flandes has turned that character to man for the reason, what I don't know. We know that none of those paintings is not portraying real Lazarus, and the interesting question is, who is the person, who is portrayed by Juan de Flandes? How he was elected to play Lazarus? And who was in the place of Jesus, when Flandes sketched that painting?

So what makes this tale very interesting, is that we don't know, why Lazarus was dying, and what Jesus did when he returned the spirit in that body. When we are thinking about the position of Jesus, there is theory, that this person just channels the energy of some other creature, what stands behind him, and delivers energy by using some channel. But that thing is very absurd, and the next two chapters are told in some parties, but I put them here for making this writing lighter to read. 

In the second painting, Jesus stands in the front of Lazarus and raised his hands, and there have been told the joke, that Jesus had taser-device, what uses salted water for sending electric shocks in the sleeve, what would give electric shocks to the chest of Lazarus, and that could simply put the heart back to work. Or maybe Jesus had some kind of acoustic device, what was removed blood clots. But those things are so-called UFO-tales, and there is no historical prove about that. 

Some skeptics have claimed that Lazarus has accidentally eaten the liver of ball fish and went to coma, and then Jesus just wait that the poison was removed from the body. Some other people claim that there would be a simple heart attack, and Jesus simply gave CPR for that body. The fact in this kind of story is that there are many myths about this kind of thing.

(Image II)

So the thing, what we must find out would be the reason, why Lazarus went to that tomb. Was he dead, or was the purpose of that "poor man" just steal the clothes, what was reserved for funerals to dress the body, and then the priests came in the place. Those men could be surprised when they saw the body in the grave, which is not used or reserved, And one very interesting idea came in my mind. 

That thing is the maybe Jesus was looking for a grave for some of his family members like himself. Is this the grave, what Jesus was mentioned to Judas, in the strange comment, where he ordered Judas to go to search the grave for himself. But there is one thing, what we should notice, and there is that Lazarus might just play dead. That means that when Jesus made the right move, that was the mark for Lazarus to stand. So has this case something to do with the crucifixion. 

Or is the tale of Lazarus symbol? Maybe Jesus was a priest who was taking care of the duties, what belonged to the rabbi, and then somebody remembered that there was the body, what was not sacred, and then somebody asked him to make that ritual. And of course, in those rituals, something good is normally said about the dead. Then Jesus asked people, would somebody know things about that dead man, and then some very embarrassing things came in the mind of people. 

That means that maybe Lazarus was a dead man, who has no past, and who was killed because of assault, and then somebody was silenced entire village. Or maybe there were writings about the genocide in the hands of that person, and that genocide could be the thing, what happened when Jesus was born. There is one remarkable detail in the painting, what Juan de Flandes has painted, and in that painting, Jesus is dressed in black. He looks a little bit different than we have used to, and someway I think that there was planned to be a girl in that place?

Would that be the code, that there was something, what made Jesus shame, and in the second painting, the face of Lazarus has been covered? Would that mean the great shame, and the man has lost the faces. There is one really interesting and terrifying tale, which is connected to this man. 

There is a strange tale, that when Jesus took the spirit back to the body of Lazarus, the original spirit was replaced by something, what should not be on Earth. So the question is has Jesus accidentally released Satan to the Earth? That is one thing, what we must think, and it is the good tale for telling people on the night of Halloween. 

(I)

https://fi.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tiedosto:Juan_de_Flandes_001.jpg

(II)

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c1/Bonnat01.jpg

In Nibelungen song is a strange mention about Attila

Attila the King of the Huns had some connections to Jesus, even we would not want to believe that thing. One is that this strange man was served 12 kings, and that thing in mentioned in Nibelungen songs. Jesus was served by twelve apostles.We are not sure that was this phrase true or does it have historical connections. Maybe some historians have wanted to portray that man, who might be Mongolian or at least some kind of nomad as the antichrist. But when we are thinking about this man, who was claimed to be an uncivilized person, who couldn't even write, we are facing another strange detail.

Roman emperor sends the delegation to the camp of Attila, and they were talking with that man. Here I must ask what language those members of the delegation have used when they have discussed with Attila, and there was a thing, that could Attila speak Latin or some roman speak the Attila's own language. If we are thinking about the thing, that Attila could not read, there is one thing, what we must remember.

That man was not probably the real leader of the Huns. He might be only the man who forwarded the commands, what was given by somebody else. When Attila decided to make the bonfire by using saddles, and told his men, that he would jump in the fire, in the case that he would be imprisoned. There might be the reason, that this man afraid his henchmen so much, that he wanted to show the example of the bravery to his henchmen, who would be otherwise disappointed about their leader.

When we are thinking about the case that Eastern Rome has been hired an assassin, the own man of Attila to murder him, we must think that this episode might be cover up for the real assassin, and the thing that Attila died in a year after the conquering the Rome is somehow supporting that theory. If the Roman assassin poisoned that man, we must realize that he might see something, what he should not see, when he was in Rome.

And the thing that the Pope said that this man would die might be the coded order for the assassin. But this might be only theory. The death of that man might be caused by natural reasons or by domestic violence. But we know that Rome wanted revenge. It wanted to send that man in the grave, who humiliated the "Greatest empire in history", or how Romans called themselves.