Nothing is stable than changes and advancing in the universe

Nothing is stable than changes and advancing in the universe

Nothing is stable at the universe and that thing consists of the universe itself. Even the universe itself is advancing all the time, and then that thing means that the universe itself is not lasting forever. Someday the last hydrogen atom is turned helium, and in that universe what would be existed in the billions of years in the future, the main element could be helium.

So when we are looking at the advancing of the universe from the beginning, it has started as the quark plasma. But then the quarks are starting to make contact together and form protons and neutrons, and this thing has caused that the universe has turned to the atomic universe.

That thing required decreasing the temperature, that the electrons could take their place in the cores, what are orbiting the protons and neutrons. After the temperature has been decreased enough, the atoms have started to make contact with another atom and formed the molecules. So this universe, where we are living can be called as that molecular universe. But then the temperature of the universe would continue decreasing, and that makes possible to forming super-large molecules.

The decreasing temperature along with increasing helium level causes that the form of material has turned to another. In that universe is also forming stars, but they are bigger, and they are fewer because those stars are burning helium in the fusion reaction. And the universe continues it's advancing and transformation because the stars are burning always the lightest elements. In the helium universe, the planets are looking at the same what we know, but they might form the same homogeneous elements, and that would turn them another type, that we ever can imagine.

After the helium universe, the advantage would turn to the carbon universe. In there the main elements in the space is carbon. There are lots of supernovas in that universe, and there are also only a few stars. Those stars are forming of the carbon, and other materials are forming the molecule balls. In that universe, the planets can turn to giant fullerene balls, and that would make them fascinating and different than we ever thought.

The thing in that universe is that it is very cold but gravity would win the expanding someday. The decreasing of temperature is causing because the size of the universe is getting larger, but there is the same amount of energy or electrons, which means that the density of energy is decreasing. And here we must remember, that gravity always wins, and then happens the big crush. Before the big crush is the moment, what we can call as the "big silence".

At this moment the universe is in its largest point, and then the particles would start to drop in the point where everything has begun. So when the density of the universe is growing, the temperature is rising, and the universe would start to repeating the sequences, what it went over during the expanding process. And this makes the universe so interesting and mysterious thing.

Image:

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/c5/M101_hires_STScI-PRC2006-10a.jpg/1280px-M101_hires_STScI-PRC2006-10a.jpg

The right-wing politics and nationalism

The right-wing politics and nationalism

Right-wing politicians are always connected with the nationalism and another kind of things like militarism. But when we are looking at history, also left-wing movements are supporting military and being even more militaristic than right-wing governments. And as we see in the cases like uniting Germany the same politicians, who were like national heroes, turned to be the most unpopular political leaders in the history, and Helmut Kohl flees from stages in the rain of eggs. But when we are looking at the right-wing government's relationship with independence, we must remember that popularity is a volatile thing.

When the leaders of the government are telling that some nation should make union with another land, and sometimes those leaders are telling that their nations should leave those unions. This is the thing in history, and always there is some argument, what supports those decisions. And the opinion of the journalists has always colored the news about those big things. When we are thinking about the crisis and constitutional problems, we must remember one golden rule: that thing is that also constitution is how we want to read that text.

When we would think that some Great Britain flees from the European Union, we must say, that there might be people, who are willing to begin new discussions with the membership of the same union. This kind of things is typical for the politics of today. And one of the thing, what brings this kind of things in the public is that there are so few things in the world, what are giving topics for media.

One of the major things what gives breaks for military solutions in crisis is that the new nations are joining the "nuclear club", and will to get those armaments are decreasing the will to get military solutions in conflicts. The nuclear weapons have influence, that the leaders of the nations would want to discuss things more than ever before. There are many things changed in the world, and one thing is that the so-called "official press" doesn't control information anymore.

And that brings so-called faked news closer to the normal people than ever before. But one question remains on the air. Why we ever discussed how attitudes of reporters have influenced to the text, what is written about something? There has been news also in respected media which is prejudiced in purpose or without purpose. That means that when we want to believe something very hard, that thing might make us blind. We might not understand that something, what we might think as fact might be an only rumor. And do we ever dare to confess, that we are wrong?

What if something that we have believed as true proven as lie or wrong? Would we want to go to the front of people and say, "I've been wrong in 20 years"? In those cases, the question is about authority. Somehow the attitudes of the community are that elder people are always right. That thing is of course because we need to respect those people, but when they are wrong, and the case is scientifically proven, we must accept that thing.

But would we want to confess that thing to our children? That's another difficult question because that thing would turn the image what we want to give our children different. We would not be perfect anymore. In my childhood were people, who teach that adults were perfect, and they didn't make any mistakes. And in younghood, we hoped to get the same position what our parents had. But then the Internet and social media turned things.

We had the opportunity to check facts from the sources, and that made the first time possible that we were wrong in front of our children. In our younghood, the books, where were information were too high, that we couldn't take them, and suddenly we could get all the information straight from the net, and that turned us erring people. Even if we would not that our children see from the internet how children should make, and we can censor those pages by using authority, we cannot censor the homepages what are telling what is going on on Earth, or what is going on in space programs.

In the past, we could say, that we need that telephone and modem, but then we got high-speed mobile Internet, what made those excuses impossible, and that means we must say that we are right because adults are always right. And sometimes those things cause little bit embarrassing situation when our children open the homepages, where is the data, what is against our opinion.

Short writing about technical poltergeist and technical remote viewing

Short writing about technical poltergeist and technical remote viewing

In the future, the eavesdropping and motoring tools can installed in the human body by using surgery. That kind of system would transmit every word and think what people would speak or see around to the NSA headquarters. And this kind of things might revolutionize the spying and dark operations.

There is a very interesting thing, that some poltergeist phenomenon would be created by using the TRW (Technical Remote View), which means that the camera prosthesis of the eye would be connected to the cell phone. Or the prosthesis itself can be equipped with the data connection straight to the internet, or by using the GPS system, that prosthesis would be connected straight to the satellites.

Because the eye prosthesis where is the camera is connected to the nervous system, the user would not probably know, that the prosthesis is sending data to the third party. And then if the system is operated by NORAD, it can use laser satellites to create the poltergeist. That means that if the person, who has this system looks at something, the operator of NORAD must only target the killer satellite to that point.

When we are thinking the implanted microphone on the ear, that implant can put in the ear, by using the same method with a surgically implanted hearing aid. And the difference between eavesdropping system and hearing aid would be that the other would send the discussions to the third party.

The thing is that that equipment can installed in the body without the inmate would not even recognize this thing. The cornea can cover the entire camera and the person would feel the touch to the eye similar, what it is normally felt. The eavesdropping system can installed behind the eardrum during some other medical operation, and the inmate would not even recognize that surgically installed eavesdropping equipment.