The right-wing politics and nationalism
Right-wing politicians are always connected with the nationalism and another kind of things like militarism. But when we are looking at history, also left-wing movements are supporting military and being even more militaristic than right-wing governments. And as we see in the cases like uniting Germany the same politicians, who were like national heroes, turned to be the most unpopular political leaders in the history, and Helmut Kohl flees from stages in the rain of eggs. But when we are looking at the right-wing government's relationship with independence, we must remember that popularity is a volatile thing.
When the leaders of the government are telling that some nation should make union with another land, and sometimes those leaders are telling that their nations should leave those unions. This is the thing in history, and always there is some argument, what supports those decisions. And the opinion of the journalists has always colored the news about those big things. When we are thinking about the crisis and constitutional problems, we must remember one golden rule: that thing is that also constitution is how we want to read that text.
When we would think that some Great Britain flees from the European Union, we must say, that there might be people, who are willing to begin new discussions with the membership of the same union. This kind of things is typical for the politics of today. And one of the thing, what brings this kind of things in the public is that there are so few things in the world, what are giving topics for media.
One of the major things what gives breaks for military solutions in crisis is that the new nations are joining the "nuclear club", and will to get those armaments are decreasing the will to get military solutions in conflicts. The nuclear weapons have influence, that the leaders of the nations would want to discuss things more than ever before. There are many things changed in the world, and one thing is that the so-called "official press" doesn't control information anymore.
And that brings so-called faked news closer to the normal people than ever before. But one question remains on the air. Why we ever discussed how attitudes of reporters have influenced to the text, what is written about something? There has been news also in respected media which is prejudiced in purpose or without purpose. That means that when we want to believe something very hard, that thing might make us blind. We might not understand that something, what we might think as fact might be an only rumor. And do we ever dare to confess, that we are wrong?
What if something that we have believed as true proven as lie or wrong? Would we want to go to the front of people and say, "I've been wrong in 20 years"? In those cases, the question is about authority. Somehow the attitudes of the community are that elder people are always right. That thing is of course because we need to respect those people, but when they are wrong, and the case is scientifically proven, we must accept that thing.
But would we want to confess that thing to our children? That's another difficult question because that thing would turn the image what we want to give our children different. We would not be perfect anymore. In my childhood were people, who teach that adults were perfect, and they didn't make any mistakes. And in younghood, we hoped to get the same position what our parents had. But then the Internet and social media turned things.
We had the opportunity to check facts from the sources, and that made the first time possible that we were wrong in front of our children. In our younghood, the books, where were information were too high, that we couldn't take them, and suddenly we could get all the information straight from the net, and that turned us erring people. Even if we would not that our children see from the internet how children should make, and we can censor those pages by using authority, we cannot censor the homepages what are telling what is going on on Earth, or what is going on in space programs.
In the past, we could say, that we need that telephone and modem, but then we got high-speed mobile Internet, what made those excuses impossible, and that means we must say that we are right because adults are always right. And sometimes those things cause little bit embarrassing situation when our children open the homepages, where is the data, what is against our opinion.
Right-wing politicians are always connected with the nationalism and another kind of things like militarism. But when we are looking at history, also left-wing movements are supporting military and being even more militaristic than right-wing governments. And as we see in the cases like uniting Germany the same politicians, who were like national heroes, turned to be the most unpopular political leaders in the history, and Helmut Kohl flees from stages in the rain of eggs. But when we are looking at the right-wing government's relationship with independence, we must remember that popularity is a volatile thing.
When the leaders of the government are telling that some nation should make union with another land, and sometimes those leaders are telling that their nations should leave those unions. This is the thing in history, and always there is some argument, what supports those decisions. And the opinion of the journalists has always colored the news about those big things. When we are thinking about the crisis and constitutional problems, we must remember one golden rule: that thing is that also constitution is how we want to read that text.
When we would think that some Great Britain flees from the European Union, we must say, that there might be people, who are willing to begin new discussions with the membership of the same union. This kind of things is typical for the politics of today. And one of the thing, what brings this kind of things in the public is that there are so few things in the world, what are giving topics for media.
One of the major things what gives breaks for military solutions in crisis is that the new nations are joining the "nuclear club", and will to get those armaments are decreasing the will to get military solutions in conflicts. The nuclear weapons have influence, that the leaders of the nations would want to discuss things more than ever before. There are many things changed in the world, and one thing is that the so-called "official press" doesn't control information anymore.
And that brings so-called faked news closer to the normal people than ever before. But one question remains on the air. Why we ever discussed how attitudes of reporters have influenced to the text, what is written about something? There has been news also in respected media which is prejudiced in purpose or without purpose. That means that when we want to believe something very hard, that thing might make us blind. We might not understand that something, what we might think as fact might be an only rumor. And do we ever dare to confess, that we are wrong?
What if something that we have believed as true proven as lie or wrong? Would we want to go to the front of people and say, "I've been wrong in 20 years"? In those cases, the question is about authority. Somehow the attitudes of the community are that elder people are always right. That thing is of course because we need to respect those people, but when they are wrong, and the case is scientifically proven, we must accept that thing.
But would we want to confess that thing to our children? That's another difficult question because that thing would turn the image what we want to give our children different. We would not be perfect anymore. In my childhood were people, who teach that adults were perfect, and they didn't make any mistakes. And in younghood, we hoped to get the same position what our parents had. But then the Internet and social media turned things.
We had the opportunity to check facts from the sources, and that made the first time possible that we were wrong in front of our children. In our younghood, the books, where were information were too high, that we couldn't take them, and suddenly we could get all the information straight from the net, and that turned us erring people. Even if we would not that our children see from the internet how children should make, and we can censor those pages by using authority, we cannot censor the homepages what are telling what is going on on Earth, or what is going on in space programs.
In the past, we could say, that we need that telephone and modem, but then we got high-speed mobile Internet, what made those excuses impossible, and that means we must say that we are right because adults are always right. And sometimes those things cause little bit embarrassing situation when our children open the homepages, where is the data, what is against our opinion.
Comments
Post a Comment