Is NATO so powerful as it claims?

Is NATO so powerful as it claims?

The question is about how united NATO would be in the real situation? Donald Trump has brought one thing in the relationship with NATO to the front of the great publicity, and that is that the USA would not necessarily support its allies. The problem is that NATO is the defense union, and if the military actions would start in Europe, the attack would be claimed to began by the European NATO country.

Nuclear weapons are a very powerful tool in international conflict. The problem is that some people would claim, that NATO is only the shield for the USA, which has a too dominating role in that military union. The thing is that Russia would support the opinions, that NATO is gone, and the USA must go back over the Atlantic ocean, and the fights would be done in the European territory.

And the other thing is that there are many people in Europe, who would notice, that the USA collects the data from the European actors and private citizens. The thing is that Europe is addicted to the military satellites of the USA, and the role of intelligence has been claimed to be very little, in things like tracking the troops of the opponent.

That kind of cooperation along with the electronic surveillance in the cooperation of UKUSA (1) are things, that would be wanted to quit by the Russians and certain political actors. And the reason, why Russia is claimed to support Trump is that this man would be wanted to disband the NSA and other intelligence agencies. And this is why the so-called Panama-leak has been done(2). The idea was to affect the leaders of Europe, that they will stop the UKUSA and disband NATO. For those people, the UKUSA is a synonym for "Echelon" (3) the NSA global surveillance network.

Those people argue that this kind of military unions is connecting European countries to the conflicts, which can be avoided by staying neutral. And if somebody would disagree, that thing means that the "real leaders" must not tolerate any kind of criticism. For those people, criticism is only a negative thing. And people should just follow their leaders.

One of the things, what pleases some people in Russia is the military forces. People claim that liberalism is caused by the back reaction and nations want moral and militarism. The democracy is too soft for those defensors of militaristic and authoritarian governments. But then we must remember that democracy is not the same thing with liberalism. When we are thinking of the cases where democratic governments started to persecute minorities, we find many cases in history.

In many South American states, the democratic government has been started to systematically persecute minorities, and the same things have been made in South Africa and Australia. During the Apartheid the South African government was democratic, but it was democracy only for white people. Black people were persecuted systematically.

And Australia closed Aboriginals to the concentration camps, but otherwise, the government was democratic. Those examples show, how the democratic government can start things, what is not acceptable. Also in many European countries, gypsies and other minorities have been isolated more or less by official permission.

So that kind of thing is embarrassing when we are looking at the history. The thing is that Russia would benefit the Internet very effectively in its information operations makes that kind of actions more effective than ever before.

(1)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UKUSA_Agreement

(2)

https://www.icij.org/investigations/panama-papers/

(3)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ECHELON

Ozma messages and alien autopsies

Ozma messages and alien autopsies

Could the stars, what selected to targets for Ozma message (1) be too young? That is the key question in that early SETI program (2). The age of Epsilon Eridani (3) is about 400-800 million years, and that means that it is a very young star, the distance to that star is about 10,47 light-years. The age of Tau Ceti (4)is about 5,8 billion years, and it locates 11,9 light-years from Earth, and that means that there is a possibility, that there could be civilization, what is at the same technical level with us, or at least the age of civilization would be the same. 

If we are thinking about the Tau Ceti, that star would be more promising than Epsilon Eridani, if we would look for intelligent lifeforms. But there is no detected civilization, and the skeptics asked are we wait to see the civilization, what has advanced the same way as we? Or is the evolution of the hypothetical planet chosen the same route, what it is chosen on Earth? But there is a strange theory, that somebody wanted that Ozma was failed. 

The selection of Epsilon Eridani for the target to those messages might mean, that there was not even wanted to get answers, or the answer should come from the colony of some interstellar civilization. So the only realistic source for the answer what comes from the endemic and intelligent life forms could come from Tau Ceti. 

If we are thinking about messages like Ozma, we can say that it might be lucky for us, that aliens might not answer. But there is a possibility, that the alien's radiotelescopes just looked another direction when those messages arrived at their stars. Maybe they have observed our solar system in the last year, and noticed, that no messages are coming, and then they have turned their antenna to another direction, and then the Ozma-message was coming.

But there is a possibility that the "Wow!" signal (5) could be the answer. We can say that there might be multiple possibilities, why SETI has been officially failed to see aliens. Search for extraterrestrial intelligence is not the same as making contact with them. 

The Ozma-messages send to the Epsilon Eridani and Tau Ceti in 1963 and the message has reached those stars in the 1970s and the answer would get in the 1980s if the aliens would answer immediately. And that thing is one of the biggest problems with that kind of research. Those stars are mentioned to be too young for the advantage of intelligent lifeforms. 

So the idea of Ozma was probably finding the intelligent alien species and the thing was that we cannot even know was the transmitting power powerful enough that the message could even know at those stars. If those messages were sent in the frequency of the hydrogen alpha emission that thing could be lost because the Sun is acting like some very powerful ECM system, which covers the signal. 

Or maybe we haven't got an answer yet. If we are thinking about an alien civilization, what might be located near Epsilon Eridani that civilization would be the colony? So could that hypothetical colony have even authorization to make contact with other intelligent lifeforms? And if we are thinking about the alien scientists and their officials, would they answer immediately, if they get that kind of message?

 When we are thinking about messages, what might come from another solar system, there is a possibility that the receiver would not even recognize those messages. If the receiver would not separate the signal from the natural radio signals that means it would not even try to open that kind of message, because it would not notice them. Do you think that SETI is a similar program with some kind of "Echelon"? (6) 

In the eavesdrop projects, the operators would even know that the sender of the message is human. And they know that the message existed. In the SETI program, the researchers would not even know, where they must look for those messages, and they don't even know that some radio signals can be a signal, what can be opened and what is sent in purpose. 

The other question is, could we even break the code? If those aliens would send the message to us, there are lots of problems even in this case, where the message is meant for opening. The smallest one would not be the language barrier, because we cannot even know what kind of language those aliens speak. And if the message is meant for internal communication with aliens, that means that it might be encrypted by using quantum computers. So could we break that kind of code?

What if the famous"Alien autopsy" was fake?

In that case, we must ask, why that fake tape was made? Was it covered for hiding the existence of living alien creature? Or was it created for tempting possible aliens to some kind of trap? When that tape was made, there is some kind of reason for that. And there is a possibility that it was made for confusing something, and the attempting was to capture the spacecraft, what might make the most interesting and revolutionary aircraft design possibly.

(1)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Ozma

(2)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Search_for_extraterrestrial_intelligence

(3)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epsilon_Eridani

(4)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tau_Ceti

(5)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wow!_signal

(6)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ECHELON

Image:

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/00/CSIRO_ScienceImage_4350_CSIROs_Parkes_Radio_Telescope_with_moon_in_the_background.jpg

About the Google loudspeakers and eavesdropping

About the Google loudspeakers and eavesdropping

There is a possibility to use artificial intelligence to create a more effective way to eavesdrop, people, and that thing is to use artificial intelligence for creating more targeted eavesdropping equipment, and the system bases the thing, that artificial intelligence can separate a different kind of sounds in the rooms, what are near that equipment. And that system can separate if there are sounds, what is coming from the assembling the assault rifles and another kind of equipment.

The sound, what comes from those parts can be separated from the sounds, what is causing by other reasons, and that system can separate sounds, what is causing by some other reasons. Also, artificial intelligence can separate the words, what people are using in the room, and target the eavesdropping to cases, where is planned to make violence against some other people, and that can make those tools more effective than ECHELON could ever be.

The thing, what makes artificial intelligence more effective tool, whatever been used in the world of intelligence is that it can filter the words and sounds, what are hearing in the microphones. That would make that system able to handle large scale eavesdropping material, and the thing is that we must use the tools of Google, or we can select some other product, what is manufactured some other service provider. 

The thing is that Google has a product, which has very much services and applications would make really difficult to bring new products in the marketing area. And the thing is that people have noticed that their privacy is gone anyway. Newspapers and other media have written tales, how people are misusing this and that, and the people are really well recognized in the pictures, what are shared on so-called regular media.

 So who cares, if there is somebody, who would collect data from private persons. The thing is that if there is some other service provider, the data collector just changes its name. This is why people keep using Google and it's American intelligence comrades.