Skip to main content

How to teach robots to follow spoken orders?




How to teach robots to follow spoken orders? 

The idea of machine learning is the same as the people way to learn things, and that's why computer game-style platforms are very interesting things to teach robots. The action or learning process is similar, what is used to teaching dogs. The robot must connect spoken words to some actions, what the programmer can do with it. 

And this makes possible to make robots, which are understanding spoken language. This method is suitable for every kind of robot, and the idea is that the words are connected to recorded actions, so when the programmers are teaching the robot to open the door, they might say "open the door" and then they would transfer to use the virtual workspace, where they can use data gloves and probably Virtual Reality glasses, and make the action by using the virtual movements by using character, what is similar what is seen in the computer games. After the system has been successfully recorded the action, that means that the command "open the door" would activate this kind of movement series. 

The machine learning means that the character, what is the thing that is controlled by a computer would say some words, then the character is moving and acting as the programmer would want. And then those words are connected to the actions, what the programmer has made for the character. 

Moving of the character can be done by using the game platform, and then the virtual character would be used to test the effectiveness of the movements, and then they can transfer to the robot, which will connect those movements and other actions to the words, what the person says. This kind of technology can also be used with combat robots. And those robots can follow the orders, what the commander says without excuse. 

This kind of robot would be very interesting in the many dangerous actions. And thing what makes character dangerous is that some game character would get the physical form. When we are thinking about computer games the programmer, who will make commands to those systems could use the computer games to selecting the most suitable series of movements, and then the commander must just select the most suitable movements and connect the voice command to that series of movements. 

When we are thinking about the actions of robots every kind of action is a series of movements. That means the system would just connect the movements to the command, and that makes that kind of robot very dangerous. The robot itself would not care, what kind of commands it would get, and if the voice recognition or other safety system accepts the command, that allows the operator to give the command "sweep that area", and then the robot will do everything, what includes in that action. So this kind of thing can be used in the Pentagon's terrifying new robot army. 

Image.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When robots are laughing and crying.

When robots are laughing and crying.  Does the AI have feelings?  Does the AI have feelings? Or can it be emphatic? The fact is this program code that controls the AI determines if it can give empathic reactions. The problem with the human nervous system is that we don't make a difference in the writing of empathic letters or telling empathic stories human or AI. Our nervous system is not adapted to AI yet. And that's why we cannot separate text written by AI from text that made by humans.  What does somebody make with AI that can emulate feelings? The fact is that the cyborgs are useful tools for infiltration operations. The human-size robots can have WLAN/6G connections with the central computers. Or they can form a neural network that shares information between all group members. The robots can also act as walking neural network-based supercomputers. That can make complicated solutions.  In those networks, each member shares information and their data-handling capacity all o

Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization

    Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization The Earth 2.0 or officially Kepler-452b is locating extreme log distance from Earth(1).    A new Earth-type planet has been found near the star, which is similar to our own Sun. The journey to that planet would take 1400 years, even if the spacecraft will reach the speed of the light. The planet has been found in the year 2008, but the confirmation of the existence of that planet has been taken time, but in 2015 the confirmation has been got, and Earth 2.0 has turned true.  The mass of that planet is 1,9 times Earth and the temperature is excellent if we are thinking about liquid water, but the journey to that planet will take so long, that we cannot ever go in there by using regular rockets and technology. The thing is that this kind of planets are the most interesting if we are looking for the lifeforms, which are similar to us, and the problem with that kind of things is that the communicatio

Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission

  Image I Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission 1) Tunguska UFO-theory  Tunguska meteorite is the mystery, that has been solved once, but then the case has been open again because Lake Cheko was not suitable for an impact crater. That lake has been introducing as an impact crater of the Tunguska meteorite. But the problem is that the shape of that lake is like a swimming pool. And that means it cannot form by a meteorite. So the mystery remains.  Meteorites can launch the natural nuclear fission if they hit the uranium ore, and transfer the impact energy to that ore. And is the thing that the famous "Tunguska" meteorite caused that kind of effect? There is also a theory that some "UFO" explode in that area, but the thing is that it is only theory, but interesting topics for some TV-series.  So I will begin this text by handling that theory, which is one of the incredible and outstanding theories in the world. Officially there is no physical evidence of