Skip to main content

Thoughts about the painting "The Last Supper" by Leonardo da Vinci (1495-1498)

https://kimmoswritings.blogspot.com/





Did Leonardo da Vinci rename that painting after his death?

Did Leonardo da Vinci paint that masterpiece with claiming that he was painting some ordinary painting for the decoration? And then changed that name in his testament? Is the person, who sits in the middle actually meant to portray Jesus? Or witch one of those characters is Jesus because there are two persons, who seem similar?

Are those same looking persons in the middle of the table actually Leonardo's way to remember, that there could be the twin brother of Jesus? The thing is that Leonardo painted that painting, and that means that we cannot ask about this master, what he might think during the creation process? Because this we can only use our imagination to create ideas, what might move in the mind of that master.

Is there the hidden hint of the twin brother of the Jesus? The mysterious "Lucifer-character"? 

Is there a hidden thing or theory about the twin brother of Jesus? The mythic "Lucifer". There is claiming that this character walked also in the middle of the people, but he chose the way of violence for the resistance against Romans. This means that the "Lucifer" was the man, who caused the death of Jesus. This character has been claimed to be the Antichrist, and the thing is that if that person would be worked like the Antichrist, that would cause terrible problems for Jesus.

This theory has supported the persons, who seem something interesting about the case, where Jesus went to the temple for giving the lesson. There he said that there is no need to pay, and then the Pharisees asked money. So was the price of the temple actually paid, but somebody else has used that space. And could that other person be the twin brother of Jesus?  That Is the key element in the twinkles what have been made about this painting, and the second question is that did Leonardo renamed it after his death by using the testament to deliver that message, and did he made that thing to other paintings?

There are many ways, how we might see this painting, and one thing is that the disciples would not seem to notice Jesus Christ, who sits in the middle of them. They are just talking together, and one of those inmates seems to show Jesus, who sits in the middle of those lines. That person seems to blame Jesus or the female character on another side of him, but the thing is that is it possible that the character in the middle of the team is actually portrayed St. Peter. And one of the characters seems to have sunglasses

Those people were sitting in the line behind the table, and if Jesus wants to wash their feet, that would mean that he must rise from the table. The thing is that those people seem to yell and argue together, and that means that there would not able to hear a thing in that room.  This will bring one strange idea in my mind.

Did Leonardo try to hint, that there could be the wrong man, who was arrested, and Jesus was able to flee? 

I now that this feels some kind of ridiculous. But it is possible that Leonardo thought that Jesus could flee, and that made him fear the Inquisition and death?  If that is the thing, what Leonardo thought, and he has discussed that thing with some other people, that thing could cause death. And sometimes I have thought that is it possible, that Leonardo painted that painting with another name, and after his death, that painting was renamed. So did Leonardo mentioned the name, what he wanted to give the paintings his testament? And during life, that man could claim that he painted ordinary paintings.

So the theory about this painting is that Leonardo thought that there is a possibility, that the Pharisees were arrested the wrong man during the Eastern evening. And there is a thing, which is very well known for the people, who are known for his personal history. Leonardo played ideas, and in fact, this artist might be thought that kind of things, while he made the paintings, what is marvelous and brought many thoughts in the mind of other people.

One of the most interesting things is the woman, who sits in the middle of those disciples. The thing that there is a woman in the middle of the group of the men is a little bit extraordinary, and maybe Leonardo painted that character to confess, that the people behind that table were not Jesus and his team. If we would think about this situation in the point of view of psychology, that woman would cause a schism between those men, and that would cause that the volume would be very high in that room.

Who those people really were?

There are some other twinkles about that female character, and one of them is that character is Mary Magdalene, but the thing is that Leonardo couldn't see that situation. And the thing is that how he created that image. Was there some kind of documents, what told how those people were sitting during the last supper.

They are all without shoes, and that thing would cause strange ideas in my mind. One of those ideas is that behind that table is sitting only the disciples and the point of view is the thing, how real Jesus has been seen that thing. And maybe Leonardo went a little bit too far in some other painting, and he afraid the inquisition, so he painted only the disciples.

The question in this painting is that the thing, what Leonardo da Vinci claimed that was portrayed, and what it really portrayed could be very far away from each another. Maybe Leonardo portrayed some ordinary group of people, and then there was something, what that painter should not see, and that's why he covered the thing as the religious painting.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When robots are laughing and crying.

When robots are laughing and crying.  Does the AI have feelings?  Does the AI have feelings? Or can it be emphatic? The fact is this program code that controls the AI determines if it can give empathic reactions. The problem with the human nervous system is that we don't make a difference in the writing of empathic letters or telling empathic stories human or AI. Our nervous system is not adapted to AI yet. And that's why we cannot separate text written by AI from text that made by humans.  What does somebody make with AI that can emulate feelings? The fact is that the cyborgs are useful tools for infiltration operations. The human-size robots can have WLAN/6G connections with the central computers. Or they can form a neural network that shares information between all group members. The robots can also act as walking neural network-based supercomputers. That can make complicated solutions.  In those networks, each member shares information and their data-handling capacity all o

Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization

    Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization The Earth 2.0 or officially Kepler-452b is locating extreme log distance from Earth(1).    A new Earth-type planet has been found near the star, which is similar to our own Sun. The journey to that planet would take 1400 years, even if the spacecraft will reach the speed of the light. The planet has been found in the year 2008, but the confirmation of the existence of that planet has been taken time, but in 2015 the confirmation has been got, and Earth 2.0 has turned true.  The mass of that planet is 1,9 times Earth and the temperature is excellent if we are thinking about liquid water, but the journey to that planet will take so long, that we cannot ever go in there by using regular rockets and technology. The thing is that this kind of planets are the most interesting if we are looking for the lifeforms, which are similar to us, and the problem with that kind of things is that the communicatio

Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission

  Image I Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission 1) Tunguska UFO-theory  Tunguska meteorite is the mystery, that has been solved once, but then the case has been open again because Lake Cheko was not suitable for an impact crater. That lake has been introducing as an impact crater of the Tunguska meteorite. But the problem is that the shape of that lake is like a swimming pool. And that means it cannot form by a meteorite. So the mystery remains.  Meteorites can launch the natural nuclear fission if they hit the uranium ore, and transfer the impact energy to that ore. And is the thing that the famous "Tunguska" meteorite caused that kind of effect? There is also a theory that some "UFO" explode in that area, but the thing is that it is only theory, but interesting topics for some TV-series.  So I will begin this text by handling that theory, which is one of the incredible and outstanding theories in the world. Officially there is no physical evidence of