Skip to main content

Writing for this Good Friday

https://kimmoswritings.blogspot.com/

Writing for this Good Friday

Today is the Good Friday, and I must say, that this day is the day when one man crucified in Palestine a long time ago. This thing caused the domino-effect, which destroyed the entire Roman empire. Sometimes I have read good comments about this case, and one of the best is found from the book "Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy". That comment is going like this: "Why couldn't we be nice to each other without nobody should nail to somewhere". And the main question is, why every advantage would go through the destruction.

Why we need crises to create advantages in society and technology? And why every time must somebody get more than others? This is a nice way to ask, why we cannot put our technical skills sometimes to the things, what is really influencing in a positive way? When we are thinking about things like nuclear weapons, we might say one thing, those weapons are not actually bad things.

The weapon itself doesn't kill the users to kill

Some people say that nuclear weapons don't kill people. The users of the weapons kill. And there is one macabre simile about the role of the weapon in the war. That simile is that the nails didn't kill Jesus in the crucifixion, the man who used the hammer and nails killed. And after that, there have been many questions about this case.

The first and the best question was, that did the executor himself know, why that man was ordered to crucified, and what the Romans told him? The second one was why the executor didn't put the poison to those nails, that the death would be faster? Was that man psychopath, who enjoyed killing and extortion? Or did some Roman told that the man was a really bad person?

The purpose of the poisoned nails was that the person could not tell anything from the cross, and that poison was normally taken from the Cobra. That neural toxin is really lethal, and it would affect in less than a minute. Poison of Cobra is really dangerous because it would pass the skin, and that means that even the spit can be lethal.

Nuclear weapons are worse than people ever think

In some scenarios, nuclear weapons can turn away or vaporize the asteroids that are in the impact trajectory with Earth. This operation must be made far away from Earth because the debris can be very dangerous for satellites or even the people. But in fact, if scientists or operators would start to push the asteroids away in the far distance, they can avoid the impact.

The system would be simple the rocket stage, what would drive on the asteroid, and then it would simply push the asteroid away. That thing might be the third rocket stage of the Saturn V, what is equipped with the feet in the nose. That system might look like the moon module, what is upside down. This system can use its rocket motor when it would push the asteroid away from the trajectory.

 But if nuclear weapons would use in military purposes, they would be a very bad thing. And the fact is that those weapons are hidden more terrifying things, what the people are even thought. Those more terrifying purposes are connected to creating and developing biological weapons. Any nation in the world is not officially creating those weapons, but there are rumors about the underground laboratories what are hidden in the artificial caves and inside those laboratories, the organisms are refining and the vaccines against those organisms are creating.

Biological weapon production is easy to hide

Nuclear weapons or explosives can someday save mankind if they are used to destroy some comet, what is coming to our direction. And another thing, what nuclear weapons have created is the peace movement, what would demonstrate that people don't want their homes to transform in ash in the temperature of billions of Celsius. And the thing is that nuclear weapons are not the worst weapons of the mass destruction at all.

The worst mass destruction weapons are biological weapons, which can destroy entire armies with a very effective way. One thing that would make nuclear weapons more terrifying, than normal people would even think, is that those weapons can be used for terminating the biological weapons laboratory if there is released the organisms.

Biological weapons are the normal organisms, what are living in nature.

The problems with biological weapons are that they are natural organisms and most of the biological weapons are bacteria, what is taken from the natural environment. Most of the bacteria are dangerous if they are transforming to the anaerobic space, and the lack of oxygen would transform their metabolism that it would start to create the poisons like botulinum toxin, what is the most effective neurological poison in the world.

That poison is creating by the bacteria, what is one of the most common organisms on the planet. Botulinum toxin is an effective part of the nerve gases, but people always forget that the botulinum is the creation of the bacteria, what living in nature.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When robots are laughing and crying.

When robots are laughing and crying.  Does the AI have feelings?  Does the AI have feelings? Or can it be emphatic? The fact is this program code that controls the AI determines if it can give empathic reactions. The problem with the human nervous system is that we don't make a difference in the writing of empathic letters or telling empathic stories human or AI. Our nervous system is not adapted to AI yet. And that's why we cannot separate text written by AI from text that made by humans.  What does somebody make with AI that can emulate feelings? The fact is that the cyborgs are useful tools for infiltration operations. The human-size robots can have WLAN/6G connections with the central computers. Or they can form a neural network that shares information between all group members. The robots can also act as walking neural network-based supercomputers. That can make complicated solutions.  In those networks, each member shares information and their data-handling capacity all o

Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization

    Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization The Earth 2.0 or officially Kepler-452b is locating extreme log distance from Earth(1).    A new Earth-type planet has been found near the star, which is similar to our own Sun. The journey to that planet would take 1400 years, even if the spacecraft will reach the speed of the light. The planet has been found in the year 2008, but the confirmation of the existence of that planet has been taken time, but in 2015 the confirmation has been got, and Earth 2.0 has turned true.  The mass of that planet is 1,9 times Earth and the temperature is excellent if we are thinking about liquid water, but the journey to that planet will take so long, that we cannot ever go in there by using regular rockets and technology. The thing is that this kind of planets are the most interesting if we are looking for the lifeforms, which are similar to us, and the problem with that kind of things is that the communicatio

Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission

  Image I Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission 1) Tunguska UFO-theory  Tunguska meteorite is the mystery, that has been solved once, but then the case has been open again because Lake Cheko was not suitable for an impact crater. That lake has been introducing as an impact crater of the Tunguska meteorite. But the problem is that the shape of that lake is like a swimming pool. And that means it cannot form by a meteorite. So the mystery remains.  Meteorites can launch the natural nuclear fission if they hit the uranium ore, and transfer the impact energy to that ore. And is the thing that the famous "Tunguska" meteorite caused that kind of effect? There is also a theory that some "UFO" explode in that area, but the thing is that it is only theory, but interesting topics for some TV-series.  So I will begin this text by handling that theory, which is one of the incredible and outstanding theories in the world. Officially there is no physical evidence of