Skip to main content

The alternative information is forming alternative reality

The alternative information is forming alternative reality

The alternative reality is one of the most incredible and at the same time dangerous things, what researchers, who are working with information theories have ever invented. This thing is distorting information because human beings are looking for company, what have similar opinions, what themselves have.

That means that the information, that people get can be from many sources, but it strongly polarized. That means that a great number of people can use the same sources, what can be faked, and that thing would cause the mass-effect on the Internet.

When we are looking at the perfect assistants for the information warriors or "trolls", what is the modern version of the world "propagandist", we might think one person. The people who could transform the faked information true in the mind of people could be the person, who is working in a trusted newspaper or news agency.

If a journalist, who is working in the qualified would believe the faked information, that thing would get the effect, what makes it trusted. And this is the thing, what we must realize. "Because that information seems real" is the comment, what might be used in the case, where the story in some national broadcast network is proven fake.

This is a really dangerous thing in modern information. We have lots of information, but we cannot say is it true or fake. When we are thinking about social media, we are facing the thing that we can get more information than ever before, and there is, of course, many people, who are acting for some kind of ideological organization.

And more interesting thing is that we cannot say, what is the ideology? Does a person even self notice, when the opinions what that individual would write or tell are ideologically polarized? If we are taught from childhood, that some ideology is bad, we believe that this thing is self-evidence. That means that ideology turns to more than politics.

This is a dangerous thing. When we are thinking about ourselves as social animals or creatures, we must realize that the willing to find the group, what has the same opinions, what we have is created to protect the group. But there is the risk, that we would be members of the small but very noisy and radical group. And that means that we might be surrounded by people. who have the same opinions, what we have.

That effect would be like blowing oxygen to flames, and that thing would exacerbate our opinions, what happens to every member of those groups. When we are hearing only polarized opinions, where every criticism is filtered away, that means that we are getting only information, which is supporting our own opinions. And we will transmit those opinions to our descendants, who might start to think that our ideology is "more than normal politics".

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When robots are laughing and crying.

When robots are laughing and crying.  Does the AI have feelings?  Does the AI have feelings? Or can it be emphatic? The fact is this program code that controls the AI determines if it can give empathic reactions. The problem with the human nervous system is that we don't make a difference in the writing of empathic letters or telling empathic stories human or AI. Our nervous system is not adapted to AI yet. And that's why we cannot separate text written by AI from text that made by humans.  What does somebody make with AI that can emulate feelings? The fact is that the cyborgs are useful tools for infiltration operations. The human-size robots can have WLAN/6G connections with the central computers. Or they can form a neural network that shares information between all group members. The robots can also act as walking neural network-based supercomputers. That can make complicated solutions.  In those networks, each member shares information and their data-handling capacity all o

Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization

    Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization The Earth 2.0 or officially Kepler-452b is locating extreme log distance from Earth(1).    A new Earth-type planet has been found near the star, which is similar to our own Sun. The journey to that planet would take 1400 years, even if the spacecraft will reach the speed of the light. The planet has been found in the year 2008, but the confirmation of the existence of that planet has been taken time, but in 2015 the confirmation has been got, and Earth 2.0 has turned true.  The mass of that planet is 1,9 times Earth and the temperature is excellent if we are thinking about liquid water, but the journey to that planet will take so long, that we cannot ever go in there by using regular rockets and technology. The thing is that this kind of planets are the most interesting if we are looking for the lifeforms, which are similar to us, and the problem with that kind of things is that the communicatio

Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission

  Image I Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission 1) Tunguska UFO-theory  Tunguska meteorite is the mystery, that has been solved once, but then the case has been open again because Lake Cheko was not suitable for an impact crater. That lake has been introducing as an impact crater of the Tunguska meteorite. But the problem is that the shape of that lake is like a swimming pool. And that means it cannot form by a meteorite. So the mystery remains.  Meteorites can launch the natural nuclear fission if they hit the uranium ore, and transfer the impact energy to that ore. And is the thing that the famous "Tunguska" meteorite caused that kind of effect? There is also a theory that some "UFO" explode in that area, but the thing is that it is only theory, but interesting topics for some TV-series.  So I will begin this text by handling that theory, which is one of the incredible and outstanding theories in the world. Officially there is no physical evidence of