Day after the truth.

Day after the truth.

Day after the truth is one of the most interesting things, that mankind has ever faced. The thing is that on the Internet is full of ideas and writings, which can give material for many kinds of information, what can be false, and the thing is that even if there are many versions about one thing, there might not be true information in any of them.

Many people want to believe, that when the head of state, what people are elected is murdered or somehow injured, there is a conspiracy behind that case. When the head of the Stasi the East- Germany's secret police Erich Mielke died in the car accident, the reason for that was of course conspiracy or assassination. The reason for that kind of thing cannot be simply the driver, who was too tired for the drive.

And of course, Olof Palme couldn't die because of error, that somebody could shoot the bottles on the empty street, and the then Palme was suddenly coming in the front of the bullet. Or that bullet was not meant for anybody else than the prime minister of Sweden. That kind of thing is fighting against our opinions and attitudes, that the target for assassinator would be always the highest-ranking man.

The motive is always political, and nobody ever thought that the target could also be the psychiatrist, who has sent people to a mental hospital, and some of those people wanted revenge. Or the motive of the Kennedy assassination or murder can't be personal. That man could not use the power to take women, who somebody loved. So the motive could also be personal, even if the killer would use some tool, which will connect that case to political murders.

There is one thing, what we must realize when we are operating on the web. We must realize that the web is full of traps, and if we believe, that we are safe, we are at terrible risk. Blind fate and trust are things, what is worse than any spying tools could ever be.

If we cannot understand the opportunities and threats of the electric publishing tools, we must realize, that we are in trouble. And when we are thinking about the cyber attacks, Finland would be a good gate to make the disinformation and false information attacks. That means that those servers would install to Finnish territory, and they can be used to confirm the world, that the Finnish government supports net trolls and other kinds of things.

That is the wors threat, what we can see in the scenarios, what are handling cyber threats. In those scenarios small and neutral state, what have goodwill with many nations offers the place, where attackers can keep their servers. In this case, the state, what wants to make the attack can operate those servers by using a remote control from their own country.

Or the operators would stay in the embassy and operate servers, which might be in the flat on the opposite side of the street. This is one threat, what we must realize when we are handling the cybersecurity. We must realize, that those operators want that people believe, that they are operating under the control of many states. And they can use another state as the platform for their cyber operations, which can turn the reputation of the state dirty.